Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: muhammad_shakeel@mentor.com,
	Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@toradex.com>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] opkg: avoid running postinst scripts twice when using systemd
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:11:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2a011e2de41685295946b44f13102f4@agner.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56bd3e44-1478-9095-4fef-3f7453b7ec94@linux.intel.com>

On 2017-12-14 14:10, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On 12/13/2017 08:29 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> 
>> Maybe it needs something like this?
>>
>>
>>          runtime_pkgmanage = bb.utils.contains("IMAGE_FEATURES",
>> "package-management",
>>                                                True, False, self.d)
>>          if delayed_postinsts and not runtime_pkgmanage:
>>              self._save_postinsts()
>>              if image_rorfs:
>>                  bb.warn("There are post install scripts "
>>                          "in a read-only rootfs")
> 
> I don't think this is correct. Some postinsts are intentionally
> deferred to first boot, and they need to be run regardless of whether
> the image supports runtime package management or not.

Yes I know, the mentioned opkg-keyrings is such a case.

If there is no package management, then scripts get deployed via
/etc/*-postinsts, if package management is available then it will take
care of it.

--
Stefan


  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-14 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-13 18:06 [RFC] opkg: avoid running postinst scripts twice when using systemd Stefan Agner
2017-12-13 18:29 ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 13:10   ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 13:11     ` Stefan Agner [this message]
2017-12-14 13:52       ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 13:59         ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 14:24           ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 14:41             ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 14:55               ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 14:57                 ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 15:14                   ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 16:46                     ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 16:59                       ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 17:16                         ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 17:28                           ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 17:40                             ` Stefan Agner
2017-12-14 17:49                               ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-14 18:04                                 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-12-16 12:02                                   ` Stefan Agner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a2a011e2de41685295946b44f13102f4@agner.ch \
    --to=stefan@agner.ch \
    --cc=alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=muhammad_shakeel@mentor.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=stefan.agner@toradex.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox