Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anders Darander <anders@chargestorm.se>
To: <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: `PR = "r0"`: Add or not to add?
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:19:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110831131908.GB19917@chargestorm.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <j3lba3$7a9$1@dough.gmane.org>

* Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> [110831 15:01]:
> Op 31-08-11 14:43, Anders Darander schreef:
> > Just curious (and it might convince me and others) what issues have PR = 
> > "r0" caused in .dev?

> The most recent one in .dev was xorg .inc files. Some recipes had PR, some
> didn't, and some had INC_PR. In this specific case there should have been
> only one PR (or INC_PR) in the .inc.

> And of course the good old "add PR=r0 to the .inc, making older recipes go
> backwards" thing.

> In OE-core/meta-oe the most recent annoyance were the gcc recipes, which now
> finally have a centrally managed PR.

> No situation is perfect, but my *personal* experience is that not adding
> PR=r0 is *less* annoying than adding it.

Thanks for the sum up.

At least I have a lot better understanding of your position now. (And
I'll have to ponder a little bit, to see if my opion should change or
not).

Thanks!
Anders

-- 
Anders Darander
ChargeStorm AB



  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-31 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-30 23:06 [meta-xfce] thunar-volman: Add initial recipe with version 0.6.0 Andreas Müller
2011-08-31  7:15 ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-31 10:06   ` `PR = "r0"`: Add or not to add? (was: thunar-volman: Add initial recipe with version 0.6.0) Paul Menzel
2011-08-31 10:23     ` `PR = "r0"`: Add or not to add? Koen Kooi
2011-08-31 11:45       ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-08-31 11:55       ` Anders Darander
2011-08-31 12:16         ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-31 12:27           ` Paul Eggleton
2011-08-31 12:33             ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-08-31 12:36             ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-31 12:43               ` Anders Darander
2011-08-31 13:00                 ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-31 13:19                   ` Anders Darander [this message]
2011-08-31 14:10                   ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-08-31 12:29           ` Anders Darander
2011-08-31 12:34           ` Otavio Salvador
2011-08-31 12:45             ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-31 13:02               ` Otavio Salvador
2011-08-31 13:30                 ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-31 13:43                   ` Otavio Salvador
2011-08-31 22:35                     ` Philip Balister
2011-09-01 10:06                       ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-09-05 10:22                         ` Ahsan, Noor
2011-08-31 13:49                   ` Paul Menzel
2011-08-31 14:07                     ` Koen Kooi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110831131908.GB19917@chargestorm.se \
    --to=anders@chargestorm.se \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox