From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [RFC] turning conf/machine into a set of bblayers
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:33:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <i9p1d0$7q4$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Recipes/linux is a mess and recipes/u-boot is as well. It would be a
nice topic for OEDEM to see if we discuss switching to a poky BSP model.
It would boil down to:
1 base bblayer with shared files:
* conf/machine/include
* recipes/linux/*.inc
1 bblayer per machine or SOC_FAMILY containing:
* machine.conf
* first and second stage bootloaders
* kernel
So, what are peoples thoughts on this? I haven't thought this through
myself, so feel free to point out any show stoppers.
I do not want this to turn into a "splitting the metadata" discussion,
while I'm all for that, it really is a seperate effort and discussion.
But any bblayer style split would benefit from OE being a collection of
git submodules instead of a monolithic tree[1].
Regards,
Koen
[1] Provided git submodules stop sucking so hard in future git versions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFMwAjgMkyGM64RGpERAs3LAKCBtFoOPe49JO/K3SlC0euYs8XOCgCeKLsF
UMRKOIhRMMwUgrh5RsQ8dEw=
=nlIb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-21 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-21 9:33 Koen Kooi [this message]
2010-10-21 9:52 ` [RFC] turning conf/machine into a set of bblayers Graeme Gregory
2010-10-21 9:59 ` Koen Kooi
2010-10-21 10:04 ` Graeme Gregory
2010-10-21 10:17 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-21 10:20 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-21 10:38 ` Richard Purdie
2010-10-21 12:01 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-21 13:46 ` Maupin, Chase
2010-10-21 14:21 ` Chris Larson
2010-10-21 16:11 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-11-01 21:04 ` Tom Rini
2010-10-21 10:48 ` Richard Purdie
2010-10-21 11:22 ` Graeme Gregory
2010-10-21 14:21 ` Chris Larson
2010-10-21 10:36 ` Richard Purdie
2010-11-02 7:02 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-02 20:46 ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-02 21:14 ` Eric Bénard
2010-11-02 21:19 ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-02 21:21 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-03 8:15 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-03 14:59 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-03 18:59 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-03 20:17 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-03 20:44 ` Khem Raj
2010-11-03 21:06 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-03 22:13 ` Khem Raj
2010-11-04 7:48 ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-02 21:57 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='i9p1d0$7q4$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox