Re: [RFC] turning conf/machine into a set of bblayers

[Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02-11-10 22:14, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Le 02/11/2010 21:46, Koen Kooi a écrit :
>> I do fear that pulling things into seperate layers too much will make it
>> harder to propagate fixes...
>>
> yes, in your example, the fines in conf/machine/include are common to
> all omap boards (and even all cortexa8 for tune-cortexa8.inc) and thus
> when fixing one BSP you have to think to fix the others (and to
> communicate the fix to other BSP maintainers).
> The same apply for most of the .inc in recipes-bsp/*/.
> 
> Do you think the following setup is possible ?
> 
> - ARM overlay (containing all generic files for ARM achitecture :
> conf/machines/include for example)
> 
> - OMAP3 overlay (containing all generic files for OMAP3 SOC :
> conf/machines/include/omap* + recipes/linux u-boot x-load base files for
> omap3 architecture,
> 
> - specific board overlay (conf/machine/themachine.conf + board specific
> additions in recipes/linux u-boot & x-load (with patches based on top of
> the OMAP3 overlay).

That was pretty much what I was thinking, the angstrom-layers stuff is
something I need to get working before thursday, so it is a bit hacky.
It will get cleaned up after I get back from my holiday :) Hopefully
more people have tried different setups and we can bang out a decent RFC.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFM0IBFMkyGM64RGpERAhVvAJ98xHlzrMSjH/d6a5//GQimg89j0wCgnVIs
ASfxeRULybqKbDAjBMlwkXg=
=tE/N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----