Re: [RFC] turning conf/machine into a set of bblayers

[Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>]

Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2010/10/21 Graeme Gregory <dp@xora.org.uk>:
> 
>> Such a pity git doesnt have increasing rev numbers, a cool adition would
>> be a flag in layer that showed the last rev of core it was tested with.
>>
>> Layer was tested with core 1 but core is now 999 would give an
>> indication on drift between layers and core.
>>
>> Graeme
> 
> Triggered by this (and apologies if I am drifting off-topic).
> It would be nice if with amend.inc you could specify the PR of the
> underlying recipe that this amend is for (and get a warning or error
> if there is a mismatch)

I know I'm late to the party but.. I don't think this is a big deal. 
Changes getting out of sync from foopkg 1.1 to foopkg 1.2?  Yes.  foopkg 
1.1 PR="r1" to 1.1 PR="r10" ?   Unlikely and something the human control 
side should be able to handle.

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation