From: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-systemd][PATCH V2 1/7] systemd: Upgrade to 187
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:38:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jvggnd$naj$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6602C8C9-45EA-47B9-B446-C96264B142B7@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Op 03-08-12 12:32, Khem Raj schreef:
>
> On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 01 August 2012 15:56:34 Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Aug 1, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Along with upgrade use the release tarballs instead of git
>>>>
>>>> For an update we need to pull in some patches from master, so a git
>>>> recipe is still the preferred way.
>>>
>>> OK, you know more about it then me but do you know how many those
>>> will be ? in other words does systemd releases mean much for
>>> stability yet or still its a project moving at so fast pace ?
>>>
>>> I see that releases are rolled out almost every month, that sort of
>>> could mean either way, we wait until the next release or just take
>>> from a commit upstream
>>>
>>> I feel like staying with a release+patches could be one way if we are
>>> not importing pathes too often. but I don't know how often that would
>>> be. For the testing I did release worked well for those platforms
>>> x86, ppc and arm
>>
>> One might suggest, if stable releases are working and you want to live
>> on the bleeding edge in your distro, you can easily do so there…
>
> This is moving forward from where we were so it includes all the git
> commits that were there until cd96b3b86abb4a88cac2722bdfb6e5d4413f6831
> commit so this update is inclusive.
>
> we can also think of having a stable recipe and a git recipe but systemd
> releases are almost a month apart it would be more or less covered if we
> moved from release to release with some patches if needed.
If you look at the fedora and debian packages you'll see that they also pull
in a fair number of patches, so it's not uncommon to do what we're doing.
regards,
Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iD8DBQFQG8Y6MkyGM64RGpERAjOXAJ4mDqgr4BngOrGZk9drnilAvprDygCcCnW7
yiaKvRITgm6shVyoul4z3a0=
=bngc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-03 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-31 18:56 [meta-systemd][PATCH V2 1/7] systemd: Upgrade to 187 Khem Raj
2012-07-31 18:56 ` [meta-systemd][PATCH V2 2/7] busybox: stopping systemd-kmsg-syslogd is not needed Khem Raj
2012-07-31 18:56 ` [meta-systemd][PATCH V2 3/7] busybox-syslog.service.in: Create alias for syslog.service Khem Raj
2012-07-31 18:56 ` [meta-systemd][PATCH V2 4/7] systemd: Use cross cpp Khem Raj
2012-07-31 18:56 ` [meta-oe][PATCH V2 5/7] testlab.bbclass: Delete Khem Raj
2012-07-31 18:56 ` [meta-oe][PATCH V2 6/7] blacklist.bbclass: Move to meta-angstrom Khem Raj
2012-07-31 19:07 ` Koen Kooi
2012-07-31 19:24 ` Chris Larson
2012-07-31 19:43 ` Martin Jansa
2012-07-31 20:46 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-04 20:36 ` Koen Kooi
2012-08-04 20:47 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-04 21:56 ` Philip Balister
2012-08-05 11:41 ` Koen Kooi
2012-08-05 19:44 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-05 21:37 ` Chris Larson
2012-08-05 22:06 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-06 7:43 ` Koen Kooi
2012-08-07 2:38 ` Khem Raj
2012-07-31 18:56 ` [meta-oe][PATCH V2 7/7] kernel.bbclass: Rename to machine_kernel_pr.bbclass which provides added functionality Khem Raj
2012-08-01 17:38 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-08-01 22:31 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-01 15:11 ` [meta-systemd][PATCH V2 1/7] systemd: Upgrade to 187 Koen Kooi
2012-08-01 22:56 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-02 8:11 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-08-03 10:32 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-03 12:38 ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2012-08-03 14:41 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-03 15:36 ` Koen Kooi
2012-08-03 18:39 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-03 18:42 ` Martin Jansa
2012-08-03 19:08 ` Koen Kooi
2012-08-04 20:10 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-04 20:35 ` Koen Kooi
2012-08-04 20:50 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-05 11:42 ` Koen Kooi
2012-08-05 11:53 ` Philip Balister
2012-08-05 19:40 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='jvggnd$naj$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox