Re: [meta-systemd][PATCH V2 1/7] systemd: Upgrade to 187

[Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 03-08-12 16:41, Khem Raj schreef:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Op 03-08-12 12:32, Khem Raj schreef:
>>> 
>>> On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Paul Eggleton
>>> <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Wednesday 01 August 2012 15:56:34 Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 1, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Koen Kooi
>>>>> <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Along with upgrade use the release tarballs instead of git
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For an update we need to pull in some patches from master, so a
>>>>>> git recipe is still the preferred way.
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK, you know more about it then me but do you know how many
>>>>> those will be ? in other words does systemd releases mean much
>>>>> for stability yet or still its a project moving at so fast pace
>>>>> ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I see that releases are rolled out almost every month, that sort
>>>>> of could mean either way, we wait until the next release or just
>>>>> take from a commit upstream
>>>>> 
>>>>> I feel like staying with a release+patches could be one way if we
>>>>> are not importing pathes too often. but I don't know how often
>>>>> that would be. For the testing I did release worked well for
>>>>> those platforms x86, ppc and arm
>>>> 
>>>> One might suggest, if stable releases are working and you want to
>>>> live on the bleeding edge in your distro, you can easily do so
>>>> there…
>>> 
>>> This is moving forward from where we were so it includes all the git 
>>> commits that were there until
>>> cd96b3b86abb4a88cac2722bdfb6e5d4413f6831 commit so this update is
>>> inclusive.
>>> 
>>> we can also think of having a stable recipe and a git recipe but
>>> systemd releases are almost a month apart it would be more or less
>>> covered if we moved from release to release with some patches if
>>> needed.
>> 
>> If you look at the fedora and debian packages you'll see that they also
>> pull in a fair number of patches, so it's not uncommon to do what we're
>> doing.
> 
> ok. However, my original motivation is to make this layer independent 
> enough and remove the layer dependencies it has It will make both layers
> thrive IMO. I proposed removal of using gitpkgv you did not like that,
> then I proposed this to remove use of SRCREV completely this also is
> objected on. may I ask what other option do you have ? I am willing to 
> make a solution. Ultimately this will make systemd integration into
> OE-Core as reference init system easier.

Move gitpkgv into oe-core

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFQG/ATMkyGM64RGpERAnAsAKCcUD6itYfYsd2xJLDYXLRoQHJL0ACcCaaH
rguf6ChRPi9AZxlufQ3+lsw=
=ASlA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----