From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
To: opensbi@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] I2C framework, reboot Unmatched via PMIC
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:26:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211020102609.683006bc@redslave.neermore.group> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+zEjCvAEjfZaQ4P21=y_yLP15pFVm+znGUGrPMPxH7TCGq-RA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:57:35 +0200
Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:20 PM Nikita Shubin
> <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> wrote:
> >
> > From: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@yadro.com>
> >
> > This series introduce rebooting via i2c da9063 PMIC, currently on
> > SiFive Unmatched board.
> >
> > "gpio-poweroff" remains with default priority of 128 - default
> > priority, da9063 is 1 by default the least priority.
> >
> > da9063-reset {
> > compatible = "da9063-reset";
> > priority = <1>;
> > };
> >
> > Is required to be added as a child node of PMIC.
> >
> > tested via Linux and U-Boot with reset extension:
> >
> > OpenSBI:
> > Platform Reboot Device : da9063-reset
> > Platform Shutdown Device : gpio-reset
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > Added:
> > lib: sbi: add priority for reset handler
> >
> > Renamed read/write to smbus_write/smbus_read, as actually this
> > is not a "raw" read/write but a one with a register address
> > provided, later a "raw" version will be need but currently i don't
> > have anything to test it.
> >
> > To Xiang W:
> > I have analized your proposal of switching to sbi_list,
> > and switched i2c adapters array to list. Unfortunately
> > to switch drivers we require "init" functions.
> >
>
> This also has the merit of getting rid of this limit of 16 i2c
> adapters, that's nice. Maybe you could use that in the gpio library
> too?
Indeed, but it's not a part of this patch series.
>
> > to Alexander Ghiti:
> >
> > > No need for the struct i2c_adapter argument as it is globally
> > > accessible.
> >
> > It looks like a more clean and reusable way to me, let's here more
> > opinions
> > > Why should the da9063 device care about the adapter configuration
> > > here? I think It should just rely on an already
> > > configured/initialized i2c controller.
> >
> > With clocks init added to sifive_i2c configure it can become usable
> > even if nobody cared about controller initialization.
>
> I don't understand what you mean here. IMO, the device driver should
> only take care of the communication with the device, not the
> controller. That can be done in the init function of the controller
> driver, which in addition would simplify the callbacks and the device
> driver code.
Well to make use of I2C you should enable it togather with clocks, see
u-boot/arch/riscv/dts/fu740-c000.dtsi for example:
i2c0: i2c at 10030000 {
...
clocks = <&prci PRCI_CLK_PCLK>;
...
It part of driver responsibility to enable clocks it requires, cause if
not is required nobody will enable them.
>
> >
> > > Establishing the link between the i2c device and its adapter
> > > should somehow be implicitly done by the i2c library, IMO the
> > > device should not care about its controller.
> >
> > And how do you think it will look like ? In out case it's not a
> > separate driver/client entity but all togather for simplicity.
>
> In fdt_i2c_adapter_get, instead of passing a pointer to a struct
> i2c_adapter, we could pass a i2c_device structure which would get
> filled automatically with its adapter chip. But that implies
> introducing this i2c_device like I mentioned in the previous review :)
> In addition, I took a look at the gpio library and they did it this
> way too.
>
> Again, I don't see why the driver developer should care about its
> adapter since everything could be done behind the scenes for him.
Are you suggesting to separate the da9063_reset into client/driver
parts ? Don't you think that it will add unnecessary complicity if our
case ?
Linux i2c_client has a reference to the adapter it's sitting on:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.15-rc6/source/include/linux/i2c.h#L336
u-boot is relying on some "default" i2c adapter/bus ideed, but if we
look on:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/u-boot/latest/source/include/i2c.h#L718
We see it's rather complex and hard to understand.
>
> >
> > Nikita Shubin (5):
> > lib: utils/reset: add priority to gpio reset
> > lib: utils/i2c: Add generic I2C configuration library
> > lib: utils/i2c: Add simple FDT based I2C framework
> > lib: utils/i2c: Add minimal SiFive I2C driver
> > lib: utils/reset: Add generic da9063 reset driver
> >
> > include/sbi_utils/i2c/fdt_i2c.h | 26 +++
> > include/sbi_utils/i2c/i2c.h | 99 +++++++++++
> > lib/utils/i2c/fdt_i2c.c | 111 ++++++++++++
> > lib/utils/i2c/fdt_i2c_sifive.c | 271
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/utils/i2c/i2c.c |
> > 85 +++++++++ lib/utils/i2c/objects.mk | 12 ++
> > lib/utils/reset/fdt_reset.c | 2 +
> > lib/utils/reset/fdt_reset_da9063.c | 214 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/utils/reset/fdt_reset_gpio.c | 18 +-
> > lib/utils/reset/objects.mk | 1 +
> > 10 files changed, 836 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 include/sbi_utils/i2c/fdt_i2c.h
> > create mode 100644 include/sbi_utils/i2c/i2c.h
> > create mode 100644 lib/utils/i2c/fdt_i2c.c
> > create mode 100644 lib/utils/i2c/fdt_i2c_sifive.c
> > create mode 100644 lib/utils/i2c/i2c.c
> > create mode 100644 lib/utils/i2c/objects.mk
> > create mode 100644 lib/utils/reset/fdt_reset_da9063.c
> >
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
> >
> > --
> > opensbi mailing list
> > opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-15 13:19 [PATCH v2 0/5] I2C framework, reboot Unmatched via PMIC Nikita Shubin
2021-10-15 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] lib: utils/reset: add priority to gpio reset Nikita Shubin
2021-10-15 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] lib: utils/i2c: Add generic I2C configuration library Nikita Shubin
2021-10-19 12:04 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-20 6:41 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-10-20 8:19 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-15 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] lib: utils/i2c: Add simple FDT based I2C framework Nikita Shubin
2021-10-19 12:05 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-20 6:49 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-10-15 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] lib: utils/i2c: Add minimal SiFive I2C driver Nikita Shubin
2021-10-19 12:34 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-20 6:51 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-10-15 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] lib: utils/reset: Add generic da9063 reset driver Nikita Shubin
2021-10-19 12:39 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-20 7:00 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-10-20 8:33 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-20 9:00 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-10-21 4:40 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-26 8:04 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-10-26 9:40 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-10-26 14:17 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-11-03 7:59 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-11-03 12:07 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-11-03 12:13 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-11-04 13:06 ` Anup Patel
2021-10-15 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] I2C framework, reboot Unmatched via PMIC Jessica Clarke
[not found] ` <1372921634305615@mail.yandex.ru>
[not found] ` <32095245-4C98-4C9E-9DAF-68167106A968@jrtc27.com>
2021-10-15 14:05 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-10-15 14:21 ` Jessica Clarke
2021-10-15 15:05 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-19 11:57 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-20 7:26 ` Nikita Shubin [this message]
2021-10-20 8:11 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-20 8:42 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-10-21 4:34 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-20 4:59 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-20 6:17 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-10-26 6:34 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-26 14:30 ` Nikita Shubin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211020102609.683006bc@redslave.neermore.group \
--to=nikita.shubin@maquefel.me \
--cc=opensbi@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox