X86 platform drivers
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Vishwanath Somayaji <vishwanath.somayaji@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] platform/x86/intel_pmc_core: Convert to DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:22:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466698960.30123.260.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160623152652.GA1217@rajaneesh-OptiPlex-9010>

On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 20:56 +0530, Rajneesh Bhardwaj wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:56:49PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> Sorry for the late reply. I compiled/tested this on linux-next on a
> Skylake
> system and it looks ok to me except for a couple of minor comments.
> 
> > +static int pmc_core_dev_state_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> >  {
> > -	struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = s->private;
> > -	u32 counter_val;
> > +	struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = data;
> 
> I am hoping that data being passed here is similar to inode.i_private
> so that we get the address of pmc struct here.

Yes, I went through the debugfs support code to be sure.

> > +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(pmc_core_dev_state,
> > pmc_core_dev_state_get, NULL, "%llu");

> >  	pmcdev->dbgfs_dir = dir;
> >  	file = debugfs_create_file("slp_s0_residency_usec", S_IFREG
> > | S_IRUGO,
> 
> Should we consider using debugfs_create_file_unsafe ?

But why? I would choose safest option among others if there is no strong
objection and explanation.

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-13 17:56 [PATCH v1 1/1] platform/x86/intel_pmc_core: Convert to DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-23 15:26 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2016-06-23 16:22   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2016-06-28  9:05 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2016-06-28 10:05   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-29  8:03     ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2016-06-29 11:49       ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-29 12:16         ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2016-06-29 12:48           ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-29 13:20             ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2016-06-29 13:33               ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-07-01 21:30                 ` Darren Hart
2016-07-04 11:35                 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2016-07-04 12:01                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-07-04 12:28                     ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2016-07-01 21:28           ` Darren Hart
2016-07-01 21:24     ` Darren Hart
2016-07-02 12:10       ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466698960.30123.260.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com \
    --cc=vishwanath.somayaji@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox