Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] tests: do more testing of block drivers

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

Am 13.05.2026 um 13:59 hat Daniel P. Berrangé geschrieben:
>  v1: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2025-10/msg01650.html
>  v2: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-01/msg02083.html
>  v3: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-01/msg02939.html
>  v4: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-02/msg03245.html
>  v5: <...somewhere...mailman is dead again at time of sending...>
> 
> The recent (at the time of v1) set of regressions identified in the LUKS
> block driver re-inforced that despite having a hugely useful set of I/O
> tests, our CI coverage is still letting through too many bugs.
> [...]

I reviewed the patches directly related to qemu-iotests. One general
remark I have about this series is that the commit subject lines often
refer to "tests" when they actually only mean "iotests" (which is the
common subject line prefix for qemu-iotests changes) instead of all
tests. This makes the lines sometimes a bit confusing, so I'd suggest to
change them.

For the other patches more related to CI and the build system in
general, I had a look at them and agree with them/their commit messsage,
but didn't fully review them. For anything I didn't comment on, you can
add:

Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>