Linux RCU subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com,
	urezki@gmail.com, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com, frederic@kernel.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 05/14] fs: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() in some paths
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 14:40:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yn+/WeuADEExfkwq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220513000717.GY1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 05:07:17PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 03:04:33AM +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > This is required to prevent callbacks triggering RCU machinery too
> > quickly and too often, which adds more power to the system.
> > 
> > When testing, we found that these paths were invoked often when the
> > system is not doing anything (screen is ON but otherwise idle).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> 
> Some of these callbacks do additional work.  I don't immediately see a
> problem, but careful and thorough testing is required.

Full agreed, fwiw I did choose several of them by looking at what the
callback did but I agree additional review and testing is needed.

thanks,

 - Joel


> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> > ---
> >  fs/dcache.c     | 4 ++--
> >  fs/eventpoll.c  | 2 +-
> >  fs/file_table.c | 3 ++-
> >  fs/inode.c      | 2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> > index c84269c6e8bf..517e02cde103 100644
> > --- a/fs/dcache.c
> > +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> > @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static void dentry_free(struct dentry *dentry)
> >  	if (unlikely(dname_external(dentry))) {
> >  		struct external_name *p = external_name(dentry);
> >  		if (likely(atomic_dec_and_test(&p->u.count))) {
> > -			call_rcu(&dentry->d_u.d_rcu, __d_free_external);
> > +			call_rcu_lazy(&dentry->d_u.d_rcu, __d_free_external);
> >  			return;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static void dentry_free(struct dentry *dentry)
> >  	if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NORCU)
> >  		__d_free(&dentry->d_u.d_rcu);
> >  	else
> > -		call_rcu(&dentry->d_u.d_rcu, __d_free);
> > +		call_rcu_lazy(&dentry->d_u.d_rcu, __d_free);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
> > index e2daa940ebce..10a24cca2cff 100644
> > --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> > +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> > @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static int ep_remove(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
> >  	 * ep->mtx. The rcu read side, reverse_path_check_proc(), does not make
> >  	 * use of the rbn field.
> >  	 */
> > -	call_rcu(&epi->rcu, epi_rcu_free);
> > +	call_rcu_lazy(&epi->rcu, epi_rcu_free);
> >  
> >  	percpu_counter_dec(&ep->user->epoll_watches);
> >  
> > diff --git a/fs/file_table.c b/fs/file_table.c
> > index 7d2e692b66a9..415815d3ef80 100644
> > --- a/fs/file_table.c
> > +++ b/fs/file_table.c
> > @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ static inline void file_free(struct file *f)
> >  	security_file_free(f);
> >  	if (!(f->f_mode & FMODE_NOACCOUNT))
> >  		percpu_counter_dec(&nr_files);
> > -	call_rcu(&f->f_u.fu_rcuhead, file_free_rcu);
> > +
> > +	call_rcu_lazy(&f->f_u.fu_rcuhead, file_free_rcu);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> > index 63324df6fa27..b288a5bef4c7 100644
> > --- a/fs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/inode.c
> > @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static void destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
> >  			return;
> >  	}
> >  	inode->free_inode = ops->free_inode;
> > -	call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, i_callback);
> > +	call_rcu_lazy(&inode->i_rcu, i_callback);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > -- 
> > 2.36.0.550.gb090851708-goog
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-14 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-12  3:04 [RFC v1 00/14] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 01/14] rcu: Add a lock-less lazy RCU implementation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 23:56   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 15:08     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 16:34       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-27 23:12         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-28 17:57           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-30 14:48             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-30 16:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31  2:12                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31  4:26                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31 16:11                     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31 16:45                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31 18:51                         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31 19:25                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31 21:29                             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31 22:44                               ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-01 14:24     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-06-01 16:17       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-01 19:09       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-17  9:07   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-30 14:54     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-01 14:12       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-06-01 19:10         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 02/14] workqueue: Add a lazy version of queue_rcu_work() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 23:58   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:44     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 03/14] block/blk-ioc: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13  0:00   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 04/14] cred: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13  0:02   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:41     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 05/14] fs: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() in some paths Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13  0:07   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:40     ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 06/14] kernel: Move various core kernel usages to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 07/14] security: Move call_rcu() " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 08/14] net/core: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 09/14] lib: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 10/14] kfree/rcu: Queue RCU work via queue_rcu_work_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13  0:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-13 14:55     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 19:10         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 11/14] i915: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 12/14] rcu/kfree: remove useless monitor_todo flag Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 14:53   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:35     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 19:48       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 13/14] rcu/kfree: Fix kfree_rcu_shrink_count() return value Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 14:54   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:34     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 14/14] DEBUG: Toggle rcu_lazy and tune at runtime Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13  0:16   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:38     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 16:21       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-12  3:17 ` [RFC v1 00/14] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 13:09   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 13:56     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 14:03       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 14:37         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 16:09           ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 16:32             ` Uladzislau Rezki
     [not found]               ` <Yn5e7w8NWzThUARb@pc638.lan>
2022-05-13 14:51                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-13 15:43                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:25                     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 19:01                       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-08-09  2:25                       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-13  0:23   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-13 14:45     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-13 18:53 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-13 22:48   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-16 16:26     ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yn+/WeuADEExfkwq@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox