Linux RCU subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com,
	urezki@gmail.com, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com, frederic@kernel.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 14/14] DEBUG: Toggle rcu_lazy and tune at runtime
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 14:38:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yn++/Rx89qZGeuI6@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220513001622.GA1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 05:16:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 03:04:42AM +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Add sysctl knobs just for easier debugging/testing, to tune the maximum
> > batch size, maximum time to wait before flush, and turning off the
> > feature entirely.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> 
> This is good, and might also be needed longer term.
> 
> One thought below.
> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> > ---
> >  include/linux/sched/sysctl.h |  4 ++++
> >  kernel/rcu/lazy.c            | 12 ++++++++++--
> >  kernel/sysctl.c              | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h b/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
> > index c19dd5a2c05c..55ffc61beed1 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ enum { sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs = 0 };
> >  
> >  extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_child_runs_first;
> >  
> > +extern unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy;
> > +extern unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy_batch;
> > +extern unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy_jiffies;
> > +
> >  enum sched_tunable_scaling {
> >  	SCHED_TUNABLESCALING_NONE,
> >  	SCHED_TUNABLESCALING_LOG,
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/lazy.c b/kernel/rcu/lazy.c
> > index 55e406cfc528..0af9fb67c92b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/lazy.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/lazy.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,10 @@
> >  // How much to wait before flushing?
> >  #define MAX_LAZY_JIFFIES	10000
> >  
> > +unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy_batch = MAX_LAZY_BATCH;
> > +unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy_jiffies = MAX_LAZY_JIFFIES;
> > +unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy = 1;
> > +
> >  // We cast lazy_rcu_head to rcu_head and back. This keeps the API simple while
> >  // allowing us to use lockless list node in the head. Also, we use BUILD_BUG_ON
> >  // later to ensure that rcu_head and lazy_rcu_head are of the same size.
> > @@ -49,6 +53,10 @@ void call_rcu_lazy(struct rcu_head *head_rcu, rcu_callback_t func)
> >  	struct lazy_rcu_head *head = (struct lazy_rcu_head *)head_rcu;
> >  	struct rcu_lazy_pcp *rlp;
> >  
> > +	if (!sysctl_rcu_lazy) {
> 
> This is the place to check for early boot use.  Or, alternatively,
> initialize sysctl_rcu_lazy to zero and set it to one once boot is far
> enough along to allow all the pieces to work reasonably.

Sure, I was also thinking perhaps to set this to a static branch. That way we
don't have to pay the cost of the branch after it is setup on boot.

But I think as you mentioned on IRC, if we were to promote this to a
non-DEBUG patch, we would need to handle conditions similar to Frederick's
work on toggling offloading.

thanks,

 - Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-14 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-12  3:04 [RFC v1 00/14] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 01/14] rcu: Add a lock-less lazy RCU implementation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 23:56   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 15:08     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 16:34       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-27 23:12         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-28 17:57           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-30 14:48             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-30 16:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31  2:12                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31  4:26                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31 16:11                     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31 16:45                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31 18:51                         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31 19:25                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31 21:29                             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31 22:44                               ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-01 14:24     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-06-01 16:17       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-01 19:09       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-17  9:07   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-30 14:54     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-01 14:12       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-06-01 19:10         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 02/14] workqueue: Add a lazy version of queue_rcu_work() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 23:58   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:44     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 03/14] block/blk-ioc: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13  0:00   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 04/14] cred: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13  0:02   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:41     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 05/14] fs: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() in some paths Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13  0:07   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:40     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 06/14] kernel: Move various core kernel usages to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 07/14] security: Move call_rcu() " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 08/14] net/core: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 09/14] lib: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 10/14] kfree/rcu: Queue RCU work via queue_rcu_work_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13  0:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-13 14:55     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 19:10         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 11/14] i915: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 12/14] rcu/kfree: remove useless monitor_todo flag Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 14:53   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:35     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 19:48       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 13/14] rcu/kfree: Fix kfree_rcu_shrink_count() return value Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 14:54   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:34     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12  3:04 ` [RFC v1 14/14] DEBUG: Toggle rcu_lazy and tune at runtime Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13  0:16   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:38     ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2022-05-14 16:21       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-12  3:17 ` [RFC v1 00/14] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 13:09   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 13:56     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 14:03       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 14:37         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 16:09           ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 16:32             ` Uladzislau Rezki
     [not found]               ` <Yn5e7w8NWzThUARb@pc638.lan>
2022-05-13 14:51                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-13 15:43                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:25                     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 19:01                       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-08-09  2:25                       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-13  0:23   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-13 14:45     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-13 18:53 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-13 22:48   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-16 16:26     ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yn++/Rx89qZGeuI6@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox