From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com,
urezki@gmail.com, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com, frederic@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 14/14] DEBUG: Toggle rcu_lazy and tune at runtime
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 14:38:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yn++/Rx89qZGeuI6@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220513001622.GA1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 05:16:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 03:04:42AM +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Add sysctl knobs just for easier debugging/testing, to tune the maximum
> > batch size, maximum time to wait before flush, and turning off the
> > feature entirely.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>
> This is good, and might also be needed longer term.
>
> One thought below.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > ---
> > include/linux/sched/sysctl.h | 4 ++++
> > kernel/rcu/lazy.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > kernel/sysctl.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h b/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
> > index c19dd5a2c05c..55ffc61beed1 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ enum { sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs = 0 };
> >
> > extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_child_runs_first;
> >
> > +extern unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy;
> > +extern unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy_batch;
> > +extern unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy_jiffies;
> > +
> > enum sched_tunable_scaling {
> > SCHED_TUNABLESCALING_NONE,
> > SCHED_TUNABLESCALING_LOG,
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/lazy.c b/kernel/rcu/lazy.c
> > index 55e406cfc528..0af9fb67c92b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/lazy.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/lazy.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,10 @@
> > // How much to wait before flushing?
> > #define MAX_LAZY_JIFFIES 10000
> >
> > +unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy_batch = MAX_LAZY_BATCH;
> > +unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy_jiffies = MAX_LAZY_JIFFIES;
> > +unsigned int sysctl_rcu_lazy = 1;
> > +
> > // We cast lazy_rcu_head to rcu_head and back. This keeps the API simple while
> > // allowing us to use lockless list node in the head. Also, we use BUILD_BUG_ON
> > // later to ensure that rcu_head and lazy_rcu_head are of the same size.
> > @@ -49,6 +53,10 @@ void call_rcu_lazy(struct rcu_head *head_rcu, rcu_callback_t func)
> > struct lazy_rcu_head *head = (struct lazy_rcu_head *)head_rcu;
> > struct rcu_lazy_pcp *rlp;
> >
> > + if (!sysctl_rcu_lazy) {
>
> This is the place to check for early boot use. Or, alternatively,
> initialize sysctl_rcu_lazy to zero and set it to one once boot is far
> enough along to allow all the pieces to work reasonably.
Sure, I was also thinking perhaps to set this to a static branch. That way we
don't have to pay the cost of the branch after it is setup on boot.
But I think as you mentioned on IRC, if we were to promote this to a
non-DEBUG patch, we would need to handle conditions similar to Frederick's
work on toggling offloading.
thanks,
- Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-14 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-12 3:04 [RFC v1 00/14] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 01/14] rcu: Add a lock-less lazy RCU implementation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 23:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 15:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-27 23:12 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-28 17:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-30 14:48 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-30 16:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31 2:12 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31 4:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31 16:11 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31 16:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31 18:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31 19:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-31 21:29 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-31 22:44 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-01 14:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-06-01 16:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-01 19:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-17 9:07 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-30 14:54 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-01 14:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-06-01 19:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 02/14] workqueue: Add a lazy version of queue_rcu_work() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 23:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:44 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 03/14] block/blk-ioc: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 0:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 04/14] cred: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 0:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:41 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 05/14] fs: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() in some paths Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 0:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:40 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 06/14] kernel: Move various core kernel usages to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 07/14] security: Move call_rcu() " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 08/14] net/core: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 09/14] lib: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 10/14] kfree/rcu: Queue RCU work via queue_rcu_work_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 0:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-13 14:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:33 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 19:10 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 11/14] i915: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 12/14] rcu/kfree: remove useless monitor_todo flag Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 14:53 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 19:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 13/14] rcu/kfree: Fix kfree_rcu_shrink_count() return value Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 14:54 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 3:04 ` [RFC v1 14/14] DEBUG: Toggle rcu_lazy and tune at runtime Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-05-13 0:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-14 14:38 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2022-05-14 16:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-12 3:17 ` [RFC v1 00/14] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 13:09 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 13:56 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 14:03 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 14:37 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-12 16:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-12 16:32 ` Uladzislau Rezki
[not found] ` <Yn5e7w8NWzThUARb@pc638.lan>
2022-05-13 14:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-13 15:43 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-05-14 14:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-14 19:01 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-08-09 2:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-05-13 0:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-13 14:45 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-13 18:53 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-13 22:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-16 16:26 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yn++/Rx89qZGeuI6@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox