Re: [Regression] 6.1.66, 6.6.5 - wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:39:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 04:26:26PM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
> > On 11.12.23 16:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 04:02:11PM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
> > > > Hi Johannes, hi Greg,
> > > > 
> > > > Any tree that back-ported 7e7efdda6adb wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range
> > > > use that does not contain 076fc8775daf wifi: cfg80211: remove wdev mutex
> > > > (which does not apply cleanly to 6.6.y or 6.6.1) will be affected.
> > > > 
> > > > You can find a downstream bug report at Arch Linux:
> > > > 
> > > > https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/linux/-/issues/17
> > > > 
> > > > So we should either revert 7e7efdda6adb or backport the needed to those
> > > > kernel series. 6.7.y is reported to work with 6.7.0-rc4.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, this looks bad, I'll go just revert this for now and push out a
> > > new release with the fix as lots of people are hitting it.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > there is actually a fix for it:
> > 
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg703040.html
> 
> That "fix" was not cc:ed to any of the wifi developers and would need a
> lot of review before I feel comfortable accepting it, as I said in the
> response to that message.
> 
> Also, please point to lore.kernel.org lists, it's much easier to handle
> as we don't have any control over any other archive web site.

Also, have you tested that proposed fix?

thanks,

greg k-h