From: "Philip Müller" <philm@manjaro.org>
To: "Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Léo Lam" <leo@leolam.fr>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] 6.1.66, 6.6.5 - wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:32:47 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <779818b0-5175-449f-93fb-6e76166a325f@manjaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB535948386880F5A2DB3C5582E98CA@DM4PR11MB5359.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 14.12.23 15:24, Berg, Johannes wrote:
>>>> So Greg, how we move forward with this one? Keep the revert or
>>>> integrate Leo's work on top of Johannes'?
>>>
>>> It would be "resend with the fixes rolled in as a new backport".
>>
>> No, the new change needs to be a seprate commit.
>
> Oh, I stand corrected. I thought you said earlier you'd prefer a new, fixed, backport of the change that was meant to fix CQM but broke the locking, rather than two new commits.
>
>>>> Johannes, how important is your fix for the stable 6.x kernels when
>>>> done properly?
>>>
>>> Well CQM was broken completely for anything but (effectively) brcmfmac ...
>> That means roaming decisions will be less optimal, mostly.
>>>
>>> Is that annoying? Probably. Super critical? I guess not.
>>
>> Is it a regression or was it always like this?
>
> It was a regression.
>
> johannes
So basically the reversed patch by Johannes gets re-applied as it was
and Leo's patch added to the series of patches to fix it. That is the
way I currently ship it in my kernels so far.
We can add a Tested-by from my end if wanted.
--
Best, Philip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-14 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-11 9:02 [Regression] 6.1.66, 6.6.5 - wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use Philip Müller
2023-12-11 9:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-12-11 9:26 ` Philip Müller
2023-12-11 9:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-12-11 9:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-12-11 9:46 ` Philip Müller
2023-12-11 10:17 ` Philip Müller
2023-12-11 11:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-12-11 20:58 ` Berg, Johannes
2023-12-11 22:26 ` Philip Müller
2023-12-13 23:38 ` Philip Müller
2023-12-14 8:05 ` Berg, Johannes
2023-12-14 8:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-12-14 8:24 ` Berg, Johannes
2023-12-14 8:32 ` Philip Müller [this message]
2023-12-14 11:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-12-16 10:47 ` Philip Müller
2023-12-16 17:58 ` Léo Lam
2024-01-03 3:45 ` Philip Müller
2024-01-03 10:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=779818b0-5175-449f-93fb-6e76166a325f@manjaro.org \
--to=philm@manjaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=leo@leolam.fr \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox