Re: [Regression] 6.1.66, 6.6.5 - wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:32:47PM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
> On 14.12.23 15:24, Berg, Johannes wrote:
> > > > > So Greg, how we move forward with this one? Keep the revert or
> > > > > integrate Leo's work on top of Johannes'?
> > > > 
> > > > It would be "resend with the fixes rolled in as a new backport".
> > > 
> > > No, the new change needs to be a seprate commit.
> > 
> > Oh, I stand corrected. I thought you said earlier you'd prefer a new, fixed, backport of the change that was meant to fix CQM but broke the locking, rather than two new commits.
> > 
> > > > > Johannes, how important is your fix for the stable 6.x kernels when
> > > > > done properly?
> > > > 
> > > > Well CQM was broken completely for anything but (effectively) brcmfmac ...
> > > That means roaming decisions will be less optimal, mostly.
> > > > 
> > > > Is that annoying? Probably. Super critical? I guess not.
> > > 
> > > Is it a regression or was it always like this?
> > 
> > It was a regression.
> > 
> > johannes
> 
> So basically the reversed patch by Johannes gets re-applied as it was and
> Leo's patch added to the series of patches to fix it. That is the way I
> currently ship it in my kernels so far.

Great, can someone please send the series like this with your:

> We can add a Tested-by from my end if wanted.

that would be wonderful.

greg k-h