* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing" failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree
@ 2026-09-29 11:43 gregkh
2026-09-30 15:09 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 1/2] sched_ext: Generalize local-DSQ handling to rq-owned DSQs Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-09-29 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tj, arighi; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 7.2-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.2.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 7de9a6fb44eae4f05e68c805d58b9c618815adfa
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026092920-protector-confused-2f3e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 7.2.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 7de9a6fb44eae4f05e68c805d58b9c618815adfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:34:44 -1000
Subject: [PATCH] sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing
a task
ebf1ccff79c4 ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics") moved the final
ops_state store in scx_dispatch_enqueue() after the DSQ unlock so that the
custody update and ops.dequeue() precede it. A task can thus be found on a
DSQ while still SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING.
The dequeue and core-sched pick paths wait for the state to clear in
ops_dequeue() but the reenqueue paths don't. A reenqueue in that window runs
ops.enqueue() and sets SCX_OPSS_QUEUED before the dispatch has completed.
The dispatcher's final store then overwrites it with SCX_OPSS_NONE and
finish_dispatch() drops every later dispatch of the task.
Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING to clear before dequeueing a task for
reenqueue, the same way ops_dequeue() does.
Fixes: ebf1ccff79c4 ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1+
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index 70b711c4de6e..725b890fcab9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -4404,6 +4404,17 @@ static bool local_task_should_reenq(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
return *reenq_flags & SCX_REENQ_ANY;
}
+/*
+ * The dispatcher stores the final ops_state after dropping the DSQ lock, so @p
+ * can be found on a DSQ while still %SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING. Reenqueueing @p
+ * before that store lands would have it clobber the new %SCX_OPSS_QUEUED.
+ */
+void scx_reenq_wait_dispatching(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (unlikely(atomic_long_read_acquire(&p->scx.ops_state) == SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING))
+ wait_ops_state(p, SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING);
+}
+
static u32 reenq_local(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, u64 reenq_flags)
{
LIST_HEAD(tasks);
@@ -4447,6 +4458,7 @@ static u32 reenq_local(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, u64 reenq_flags)
if (!local_task_should_reenq(rq, p, &reenq_flags, &reason))
continue;
+ scx_reenq_wait_dispatching(p);
scx_dispatch_dequeue(rq, p);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON_MASK))
@@ -4570,6 +4582,7 @@ static void reenq_user(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, u64 reenq_flag
}
/* @p is on @dsq, its rq and @dsq are locked */
+ scx_reenq_wait_dispatching(p);
dispatch_dequeue_locked(p, dsq);
raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
index 3464e0f113c1..115c96fbf932 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
@@ -2078,6 +2078,7 @@ void scx_kick_cpu(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, u64 flags);
u64 __scx_bpf_now(struct rq *rq);
void schedule_dsq_reenq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,
u64 reenq_flags, struct rq *locked_rq);
+void scx_reenq_wait_dispatching(struct task_struct *p);
int __scx_init_task(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
struct cgroup *cgrp, bool fork);
void scx_enable_task(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c b/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
index f7aeb1488566..a30c965b175d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
@@ -801,6 +801,7 @@ void scx_reenq_reject(struct rq *rq)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->migration_pending))
continue;
+ scx_reenq_wait_dispatching(p);
scx_dispatch_dequeue(rq, p);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON_MASK))
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH 7.2.y 1/2] sched_ext: Generalize local-DSQ handling to rq-owned DSQs 2026-09-29 11:43 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing" failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree gregkh @ 2026-09-30 15:09 ` Sasha Levin 2026-09-30 15:09 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 2/2] sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing a task Sasha Levin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-09-30 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable; +Cc: Tejun Heo, Andrea Righi, Sasha Levin From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> [ Upstream commit bf6cf1886a56eaf929d8193a3f4b30be59a778e2 ] The local DSQ is synchronized by the containing rq lock rather than its own dsq->lock. A later patch adds a second such DSQ. In preparation, factor the "rq owns the lock" test into dsq_is_rq_owned() and rename local_dsq_post_enq() to rq_owned_post_enq(), taking @rq explicitly. No behavior change. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com> Stable-dep-of: 7de9a6fb44ea ("sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing a task") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c index 906e4f08967f8..665825f1d1ff4 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c @@ -95,6 +95,17 @@ static atomic_long_t scx_hotplug_seq = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0); /* Global cursor for the per-CPU tid allocator. Starts at 1; tid 0 is reserved. */ static atomic64_t scx_tid_cursor = ATOMIC64_INIT(1); +/* is @dsq synchronized by the containing rq lock instead of dsq->lock? */ +static bool dsq_is_rq_owned(struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq) +{ + switch (dsq->id) { + case SCX_DSQ_LOCAL: + return true; + default: + return false; + } +} + #ifdef CONFIG_EXT_SUB_SCHED /* * The sub sched being enabled. Used by scx_disable_and_exit_task() to exit @@ -1466,11 +1477,10 @@ static void call_task_dequeue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, p->scx.flags &= ~SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY; } -static void local_dsq_post_enq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, - struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags) +static void rq_owned_post_enq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, + struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p, + u64 enq_flags) { - struct rq *rq = container_of(dsq, struct rq, scx.local_dsq); - call_task_dequeue(sch, rq, p, 0); /* @@ -1530,13 +1540,13 @@ static void dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags) { - bool is_local = dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL; + bool is_rq_owned = dsq_is_rq_owned(dsq); WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.dsq || !list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node)); WARN_ON_ONCE((p->scx.dsq_flags & SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ) || !RB_EMPTY_NODE(&p->scx.dsq_priq)); - if (!is_local) { + if (!is_rq_owned) { raw_spin_lock_nested(&dsq->lock, (enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_NESTED) ? SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING : 0); @@ -1631,8 +1641,8 @@ static void dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, * ops_state first, both sides would modify p->scx.flags * concurrently in a non-atomic way. */ - if (is_local) { - local_dsq_post_enq(sch, dsq, p, enq_flags); + if (is_rq_owned) { + rq_owned_post_enq(sch, rq, dsq, p, enq_flags); } else { /* * Task on global/bypass DSQ: leave custody, task on @@ -1679,7 +1689,7 @@ static void task_unlink_from_dsq(struct task_struct *p, static void dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq = p->scx.dsq; - bool is_local = dsq == &rq->scx.local_dsq; + bool is_rq_owned = dsq && dsq_is_rq_owned(dsq); lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq); @@ -1703,7 +1713,7 @@ static void dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) return; } - if (!is_local) + if (!is_rq_owned) raw_spin_lock(&dsq->lock); /* @@ -1725,7 +1735,7 @@ static void dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) } p->scx.dsq = NULL; - if (!is_local) + if (!is_rq_owned) raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock); } @@ -2277,7 +2287,7 @@ static void move_local_task_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, dsq_inc_nr(dst_dsq, p, enq_flags); p->scx.dsq = dst_dsq; - local_dsq_post_enq(sch, dst_dsq, p, enq_flags); + rq_owned_post_enq(sch, dst_rq, dst_dsq, p, enq_flags); } /** -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 7.2.y 2/2] sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing a task 2026-09-30 15:09 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 1/2] sched_ext: Generalize local-DSQ handling to rq-owned DSQs Sasha Levin @ 2026-09-30 15:09 ` Sasha Levin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-09-30 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable; +Cc: Tejun Heo, Andrea Righi, Sasha Levin From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> [ Upstream commit 7de9a6fb44eae4f05e68c805d58b9c618815adfa ] ebf1ccff79c4 ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics") moved the final ops_state store in scx_dispatch_enqueue() after the DSQ unlock so that the custody update and ops.dequeue() precede it. A task can thus be found on a DSQ while still SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING. The dequeue and core-sched pick paths wait for the state to clear in ops_dequeue() but the reenqueue paths don't. A reenqueue in that window runs ops.enqueue() and sets SCX_OPSS_QUEUED before the dispatch has completed. The dispatcher's final store then overwrites it with SCX_OPSS_NONE and finish_dispatch() drops every later dispatch of the task. Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING to clear before dequeueing a task for reenqueue, the same way ops_dequeue() does. Fixes: ebf1ccff79c4 ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1+ Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com> [ inlined scx_reenq_wait_dispatching() into the existing reenqueue functions. ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c index 665825f1d1ff4..2080e0c1edbcb 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c @@ -4295,6 +4295,14 @@ static u32 reenq_local(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, u64 reenq_flags) if (!local_task_should_reenq(p, &reenq_flags, &reason)) continue; + /* + * The dispatcher stores the final ops_state after dropping the DSQ + * lock, so @p can be found on a DSQ while still + * %SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING. Reenqueueing @p before that store lands + * would have it clobber the new %SCX_OPSS_QUEUED. + */ + if (unlikely(atomic_long_read_acquire(&p->scx.ops_state) == SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING)) + wait_ops_state(p, SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING); dispatch_dequeue(rq, p); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON_MASK)) @@ -4417,6 +4425,8 @@ static void reenq_user(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, u64 reenq_flag } /* @p is on @dsq, its rq and @dsq are locked */ + if (unlikely(atomic_long_read_acquire(&p->scx.ops_state) == SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING)) + wait_ops_state(p, SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING); dispatch_dequeue_locked(p, dsq); raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock); -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-30 15:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-09-29 11:43 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing" failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree gregkh 2026-09-30 15:09 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 1/2] sched_ext: Generalize local-DSQ handling to rq-owned DSQs Sasha Levin 2026-09-30 15:09 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 2/2] sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing a task Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox