Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Yan <felixonmars@archlinux.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, hch@lst.de
Cc: "Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"Cláudio Sampaio" <patola@gmail.com>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] nvme: avoid bogus CRTO values
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 22:48:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536c792d-984c-439b-8ee9-25b1bfc5c791@archlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230913202810.2631288-1-kbusch@meta.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3801 bytes --]

On 9/13/23 23:28, Keith Busch wrote:
> From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> 
> Some devices are reporting Controller Ready Modes Supported, but return
> 0 for CRTO. These devices require a much higher time to ready than that,
> so they are failing to initialize after the driver started preferring
> that value over CAP.TO.
> 
> The spec requires CAP.TO match the appropritate CRTO value, or be set to
> 0xff if CRTO is larger than that. This means that CAP.TO can be used to
> validate if CRTO is reliable, and provides an appropriate fallback for
> setting the timeout value if not. Use whichever is larger.
> 
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217863
> Reported-by: Cláudio Sampaio <patola@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Felix Yan <felixonmars@archlinux.org>
> Based-on-a-patch-by: Felix Yan <felixonmars@archlinux.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> ---
> v1->v2:
>    Warn once if driver isn't relying on CRTO values
> 
>   drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 37b6fa7466620..0685ed4f2dc49 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -2245,25 +2245,8 @@ int nvme_enable_ctrl(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
>   	else
>   		ctrl->ctrl_config = NVME_CC_CSS_NVM;
>   
> -	if (ctrl->cap & NVME_CAP_CRMS_CRWMS) {
> -		u32 crto;
> -
> -		ret = ctrl->ops->reg_read32(ctrl, NVME_REG_CRTO, &crto);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			dev_err(ctrl->device, "Reading CRTO failed (%d)\n",
> -				ret);
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> -
> -		if (ctrl->cap & NVME_CAP_CRMS_CRIMS) {
> -			ctrl->ctrl_config |= NVME_CC_CRIME;
> -			timeout = NVME_CRTO_CRIMT(crto);
> -		} else {
> -			timeout = NVME_CRTO_CRWMT(crto);
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		timeout = NVME_CAP_TIMEOUT(ctrl->cap);
> -	}
> +	if (ctrl->cap & NVME_CAP_CRMS_CRWMS && ctrl->cap & NVME_CAP_CRMS_CRIMS)
> +		ctrl->ctrl_config |= NVME_CC_CRIME;
>   
>   	ctrl->ctrl_config |= (NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SHIFT - 12) << NVME_CC_MPS_SHIFT;
>   	ctrl->ctrl_config |= NVME_CC_AMS_RR | NVME_CC_SHN_NONE;
> @@ -2277,6 +2260,39 @@ int nvme_enable_ctrl(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   
> +	/* CAP value may change after initial CC write */
> +	ret = ctrl->ops->reg_read64(ctrl, NVME_REG_CAP, &ctrl->cap);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	timeout = NVME_CAP_TIMEOUT(ctrl->cap);
> +	if (ctrl->cap & NVME_CAP_CRMS_CRWMS) {
> +		u32 crto, ready_timeout;
> +
> +		ret = ctrl->ops->reg_read32(ctrl, NVME_REG_CRTO, &crto);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(ctrl->device, "Reading CRTO failed (%d)\n",
> +				ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * CRTO should always be greater or equal to CAP.TO, but some
> +		 * devices are known to get this wrong. Use the larger of the
> +		 * two values.
> +		 */
> +		if (ctrl->ctrl_config & NVME_CC_CRIME)
> +			ready_timeout = NVME_CRTO_CRIMT(crto);
> +		else
> +			ready_timeout = NVME_CRTO_CRWMT(crto);
> +
> +		if (ready_timeout < timeout)
> +			dev_warn_once(ctrl->device, "bad crto:%x cap:%llx\n",
> +				      crto, ctrl->cap);
> +		else
> +			timeout = ready_timeout;
> +	}
> +
>   	ctrl->ctrl_config |= NVME_CC_ENABLE;
>   	ret = ctrl->ops->reg_write32(ctrl, NVME_REG_CC, ctrl->ctrl_config);
>   	if (ret)

Thanks, verified that it works well here.

I noticed only one very small issue: dev_warn_once seems to only print 
once when multiple devices are affected. It may be more ideal if it 
prints once for each device, but I don't know how to really achieve that...

-- 
Regards,
Felix Yan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-14 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-13 20:28 [PATCHv2] nvme: avoid bogus CRTO values Keith Busch
2023-09-14 15:21 ` Keith Busch
2023-09-14 19:48 ` Felix Yan [this message]
2023-09-14 19:58   ` Keith Busch
2023-09-14 20:07     ` Felix Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=536c792d-984c-439b-8ee9-25b1bfc5c791@archlinux.org \
    --to=felixonmars@archlinux.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=patola@gmail.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox