U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>,
	Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>, Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>,
	Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	michael@amarulasolutions.com,
	dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com, afd@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com,
	praneeth@ti.com, srk@ti.com, r-gunasekaran@ti.com,
	u-boot@lists.denx.de,
	Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:06:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179ded75-e874-41c1-a76d-1fadce65881f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6b3cf36-8e33-4e0d-9794-35ea32410c88@kernel.org>

+Lukasz & Mattijs

On 10/01/2024 11:34, Roger Quadros wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/01/2024 22:00, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:18:59PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>>> On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>>>  CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
>>>>>  CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
>>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
>>>>> +CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
>>>>> +CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
>>>>
>>>> Why not handle this as device tree partitions?
>>>
>>> I honestly forget what the preferred way of defining and passing NAND
>>> partition information is these days. It might even be the funny case
>>> that passing as cmdline args is "best" rather than fixed-partitions
>>> binding?
>>
>> According to past discussions [1] doing the fixup in U-Boot is not advised.
>>
>> Using the command line or having the partition fixed in the DT are both
>> valid options.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230206224838.75963-1-francesco@dolcini.it/
>>
>> Francesco
>>
> 
> This was not about passing mtdparts to kernel but about getting 'mtdparts' command
> to work at u-boot. I need to figure out why OF partition parser didn't work here.
> 
> For a start I didn't have CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS set. Maybe I'm missing something more.
> 

The issue was the NAND driver was not setting chip->dev and chip->ofnode correctly.
Now 'mtd list' shows partitions from the DT.
But, 'dfu 0 nand list' still fails like so.
	"mtdparts variable not set, see 'help mtdparts'"

Looks like dfu_nand driver doesn't fall back to OF partitions if mtdparts environment
is not defined.

Should we add OF partitions support to dfu_nand driver or is it deprecated
in favor of dfu_mtd driver?

-- 
cheers,
-roger

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-10 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-09 12:26 [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] memory: ti-gpmc: Fix build Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] mtd: rawnand: omap_gpmc: Use DT provided IO address Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: mach-k3: am642: Define NAND boot device Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 19:16   ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 19:48     ` Tom Rini
2024-01-09 20:00       ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 20:35         ` Tom Rini
2024-01-09 19:18   ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 19:54     ` Tom Rini
2024-01-09 20:00       ` Francesco Dolcini
2024-01-09 20:22         ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-10  9:34         ` Roger Quadros
2024-01-10 16:06           ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2024-01-10 16:30             ` Tom Rini
2024-01-09 19:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Nishanth Menon
2024-01-11 12:15   ` Roger Quadros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179ded75-e874-41c1-a76d-1fadce65881f@kernel.org \
    --to=rogerq@kernel.org \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=francesco.dolcini@toradex.com \
    --cc=francesco@dolcini.it \
    --cc=lukma@denx.de \
    --cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=mkorpershoek@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=praneeth@ti.com \
    --cc=r-gunasekaran@ti.com \
    --cc=srk@ti.com \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox