From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
michael@amarulasolutions.com,
dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com, afd@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com,
praneeth@ti.com, srk@ti.com, r-gunasekaran@ti.com,
u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:35:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240109203522.GZ1610741@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240109200014.wda3anzu4gljeic6@glitch>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1086 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:00:14PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 14:48-20240109, Tom Rini wrote:
> [...]
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > Why not a config fragment?
> >
> > To me, this makes sense to keep in the main config. It can be turned off
> > as needed, and at run time if it's not present, it's safe.
>
> Three reasons:
> * There is going to be duplication across multiple boards
> * It confuses the affair of trying to find the minimal configuration needed
> to boot the board.
> * SRAM is limited already - we have been playing all kind of dances
> around this - NAND is a daughter card addon - while I am not trying to
> diminish NAND support, we are in a constant struggle to keep SRAM
> viable and adding additional boot modes to a single config, IMHO is
> the wrong direction to go.
At the end of the day, I'll leave it to TI folks. I see that
drivers/mtd/Kconfig needs a whole lot of help as while I would have
hoped that turning off just CONFIG_MTD would undo most of the changes
here, it does not.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-09 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-09 12:26 [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] memory: ti-gpmc: Fix build Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] mtd: rawnand: omap_gpmc: Use DT provided IO address Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: mach-k3: am642: Define NAND boot device Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 19:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 19:48 ` Tom Rini
2024-01-09 20:00 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 20:35 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2024-01-09 19:18 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 19:54 ` Tom Rini
2024-01-09 20:00 ` Francesco Dolcini
2024-01-09 20:22 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-10 9:34 ` Roger Quadros
2024-01-10 16:06 ` Roger Quadros
2024-01-10 16:30 ` Tom Rini
2024-01-09 19:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Nishanth Menon
2024-01-11 12:15 ` Roger Quadros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240109203522.GZ1610741@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=praneeth@ti.com \
--cc=r-gunasekaran@ti.com \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=srk@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox