* [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/18] tpm: add Revision ID field in the chip structure
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/18] tpm: rename tpm_tis_infineon in tpm_tis_infineon_i2c Miquel Raynal
` (17 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
TPM are shipped with a few read-only register from which we can retrieve
for instance:
- vendor ID
- product ID
- revision ID
Product and vendor ID share the same register and are already referenced
in the tpm_chip structure. Add the revision ID entry which is missing.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h b/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h
index 25b152b321..2b81f3be50 100644
--- a/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h
+++ b/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct tpm_chip {
int is_open;
int locality;
u32 vend_dev;
+ u8 rid;
unsigned long timeout_a, timeout_b, timeout_c, timeout_d; /* msec */
ulong chip_type;
};
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/18] tpm: rename tpm_tis_infineon in tpm_tis_infineon_i2c
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/18] tpm: add Revision ID field in the chip structure Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/18] tpm: add support for TPMv2 SPI modules Miquel Raynal
` (16 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
As the chips driven by tpm_tis_infineon.c are only I2C chips, rename the
driver with the _i2c suffix to prepare the venue of its _spi cousin.
Also change the driver name in the U_BOOT_DRIVER structure.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/tpm/Kconfig | 4 ++--
drivers/tpm/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/tpm/{tpm_tis_infineon.c => tpm_tis_infineon_i2c.c} | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename drivers/tpm/{tpm_tis_infineon.c => tpm_tis_infineon_i2c.c} (99%)
diff --git a/drivers/tpm/Kconfig b/drivers/tpm/Kconfig
index 2a64bc49c3..a98570ee77 100644
--- a/drivers/tpm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/tpm/Kconfig
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ config TPM_ATMEL_TWI
to the device using the standard TPM Interface Specification (TIS)
protocol
-config TPM_TIS_INFINEON
+config TPM_TIS_INFINEON_I2C
bool "Enable support for Infineon SLB9635/45 TPMs on I2C"
depends on TPM && DM_I2C
help
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ config TPM_TIS_INFINEON
config TPM_TIS_I2C_BURST_LIMITATION
bool "Enable I2C burst length limitation"
- depends on TPM_TIS_INFINEON
+ depends on TPM_TIS_INFINEON_I2C
help
Some broken TPMs have a limitation on the number of bytes they can
receive in one message. Enable this option to allow you to set this
diff --git a/drivers/tpm/Makefile b/drivers/tpm/Makefile
index c42a93f267..5a19a58f43 100644
--- a/drivers/tpm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/tpm/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_TPM) += tpm-uclass.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_ATMEL_TWI) += tpm_atmel_twi.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS_INFINEON) += tpm_tis_infineon.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS_INFINEON_I2C) += tpm_tis_infineon_i2c.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS_LPC) += tpm_tis_lpc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS_SANDBOX) += tpm_tis_sandbox.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_ST33ZP24_I2C) += tpm_tis_st33zp24_i2c.o
diff --git a/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_infineon.c b/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_infineon_i2c.c
similarity index 99%
rename from drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_infineon.c
rename to drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_infineon_i2c.c
index 41b748e7a2..c29c2d1106 100644
--- a/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_infineon.c
+++ b/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_infineon_i2c.c
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static const struct udevice_id tpm_tis_i2c_ids[] = {
};
U_BOOT_DRIVER(tpm_tis_i2c) = {
- .name = "tpm_tis_infineon",
+ .name = "tpm_tis_infineon_i2c",
.id = UCLASS_TPM,
.of_match = tpm_tis_i2c_ids,
.ops = &tpm_tis_i2c_ops,
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/18] tpm: add support for TPMv2 SPI modules
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/18] tpm: add Revision ID field in the chip structure Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/18] tpm: rename tpm_tis_infineon in tpm_tis_infineon_i2c Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/18] tpm: fix indentation in command list before adding more Miquel Raynal
` (15 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add the tpm_tis_spi driver that should support any TPMv2 compliant (SPI)
module.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/tpm/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/tpm/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h | 3 +
drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c | 656 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 669 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
diff --git a/drivers/tpm/Kconfig b/drivers/tpm/Kconfig
index a98570ee77..cc57008b6a 100644
--- a/drivers/tpm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/tpm/Kconfig
@@ -46,6 +46,15 @@ config TPM_TIS_I2C_BURST_LIMITATION_LEN
help
Use this to set the burst limitation length
+config TPM_TIS_SPI
+ bool "Enable support for TPMv2 SPI chips"
+ depends on TPM && DM_SPI
+ help
+ This driver supports TPMv2 devices connected on the SPI bus.
+ The usual TPM operations and the 'tpm' command can be used to talk
+ to the device using the standard TPM Interface Specification (TIS)
+ protocol
+
config TPM_TIS_LPC
bool "Enable support for Infineon SLB9635/45 TPMs on LPC"
depends on TPM && X86
diff --git a/drivers/tpm/Makefile b/drivers/tpm/Makefile
index 5a19a58f43..a753b24230 100644
--- a/drivers/tpm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/tpm/Makefile
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TPM) += tpm-uclass.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_ATMEL_TWI) += tpm_atmel_twi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS_INFINEON_I2C) += tpm_tis_infineon_i2c.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS_SPI) += tpm_tis_spi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS_LPC) += tpm_tis_lpc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS_SANDBOX) += tpm_tis_sandbox.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TPM_ST33ZP24_I2C) += tpm_tis_st33zp24_i2c.o
diff --git a/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h b/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h
index 2b81f3be50..1f4b0c24bd 100644
--- a/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h
+++ b/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis.h
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ enum tpm_timeout {
#define TPM_RSP_SIZE_BYTE 2
#define TPM_RSP_RC_BYTE 6
+/* Number of xfer retries */
+#define TPM_XFER_RETRY 10
+
struct tpm_chip {
int is_open;
int locality;
diff --git a/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c b/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..17f6cfa85c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,656 @@
+/*
+ * Author:
+ * Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
+ *
+ * Description:
+ * SPI-level driver for TCG/TIS TPM (trusted platform module).
+ * Specifications at www.trustedcomputinggroup.org
+ *
+ * This device driver implements the TPM interface as defined in
+ * the TCG SPI protocol stack version 2.0.
+ *
+ * It is based on the U-Boot driver tpm_tis_infineon_i2c.c.
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <dm.h>
+#include <fdtdec.h>
+#include <spi.h>
+#include <tpm.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h>
+
+#include "tpm_tis.h"
+#include "tpm_internal.h"
+
+DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
+
+#define TPM_ACCESS(l) (0x0000 | ((l) << 12))
+#define TPM_INT_ENABLE(l) (0x0008 | ((l) << 12))
+#define TPM_STS(l) (0x0018 | ((l) << 12))
+#define TPM_DATA_FIFO(l) (0x0024 | ((l) << 12))
+#define TPM_DID_VID(l) (0x0F00 | ((l) << 12))
+#define TPM_RID(l) (0x0F04 | ((l) << 12))
+
+#define MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE 64
+
+/*
+ * tpm_tis_spi_read() - read from TPM register
+ * @addr: register address to read from
+ * @buffer: provided by caller
+ * @len: number of bytes to read
+ *
+ * Read len bytes from TPM register and put them into
+ * buffer (little-endian format, i.e. first byte is put into buffer[0]).
+ *
+ * NOTE: TPM is big-endian for multi-byte values. Multi-byte
+ * values have to be swapped.
+ *
+ * Return -EIO on error, 0 on success.
+ */
+static int tpm_tis_spi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, u32 addr, const u8 *out,
+ u8 *in, u16 len)
+{
+ struct spi_slave *slave = dev_get_parent_priv(dev);
+ int transfer_len, ret;
+ u8 tx_buf[MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE];
+ u8 rx_buf[MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE];
+
+ if (in && out) {
+ debug("%s: cannot do full duplex\n", __func__);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ ret = spi_claim_bus(slave);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ debug("%s: could not claim bus\n", __func__);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ while (len) {
+ /* Request */
+ transfer_len = min_t(u16, len, MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE);
+ tx_buf[0] = (in ? BIT(7) : 0) | (transfer_len - 1);
+ tx_buf[1] = 0xD4;
+ tx_buf[2] = addr >> 8;
+ tx_buf[3] = addr;
+
+ ret = spi_xfer(slave, 4 * 8, tx_buf, rx_buf, SPI_XFER_BEGIN);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ debug("%s: spi request transfer failed (err: %d)\n",
+ __func__, ret);
+ goto release_bus;
+ }
+
+ /* Wait state */
+ if (!(rx_buf[3] & 0x1)) {
+ int i;
+
+ rx_buf[0] = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < TPM_XFER_RETRY; i++) {
+ ret = spi_xfer(slave, 1 * 8, NULL, rx_buf, 0);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ debug("%s: wait state failed: %d\n",
+ __func__, ret);
+ goto release_bus;
+ }
+
+ if (rx_buf[0] & 0x1)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (i == TPM_RETRY) {
+ debug("%s: timeout on wait state\n", __func__);
+ ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ goto release_bus;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Read/Write */
+ if (out) {
+ memcpy(tx_buf, out, transfer_len);
+ out += transfer_len;
+ }
+
+ ret = spi_xfer(slave, transfer_len * 8,
+ out ? tx_buf : NULL,
+ in ? rx_buf : NULL,
+ SPI_XFER_END);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ debug("%s: spi read transfer failed (err: %d)\n",
+ __func__, ret);
+ goto release_bus;
+ }
+
+ if (in) {
+ memcpy(in, rx_buf, transfer_len);
+ in += transfer_len;
+ }
+
+ len -= transfer_len;
+ }
+
+release_bus:
+ /* If an error occurred, release the chip by deasserting the CS */
+ if (ret < 0)
+ spi_xfer(slave, 0, NULL, NULL, SPI_XFER_END);
+
+ spi_release_bus(slave);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_read(struct udevice *dev, u16 addr, u8 *in, u16 len)
+{
+ return tpm_tis_spi_xfer(dev, addr, NULL, in, len);
+}
+
+static __maybe_unused int tpm_tis_spi_read16(struct udevice *dev, u32 addr,
+ u16 *result)
+{
+ __le16 result_le;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_read(dev, addr, (u8 *)&result_le, sizeof(u16));
+ if (!ret)
+ *result = le16_to_cpu(result_le);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static __maybe_unused int tpm_tis_spi_read32(struct udevice *dev, u32 addr,
+ u32 *result)
+{
+ __le32 result_le;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_read(dev, addr, (u8 *)&result_le, sizeof(u32));
+ if (!ret)
+ *result = le32_to_cpu(result_le);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_write(struct udevice *dev, u16 addr, const u8 *out,
+ u16 len)
+{
+ return tpm_tis_spi_xfer(dev, addr, out, NULL, len);
+}
+
+static __maybe_unused int tpm_tis_spi_write32(struct udevice *dev, u32 addr,
+ u32 value)
+{
+ __le32 value_le = cpu_to_le32(value);
+
+ return tpm_tis_spi_write(dev, addr, (const u8 *)&value_le, sizeof(u32));
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_check_locality(struct udevice *dev, int loc)
+{
+ const u8 mask = TPM_ACCESS_ACTIVE_LOCALITY | TPM_ACCESS_VALID;
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+ u8 buf;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_read(dev, TPM_ACCESS(loc), &buf, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if ((buf & mask) == mask) {
+ chip->locality = loc;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return -ENOENT;
+}
+
+static void tpm_tis_spi_release_locality(struct udevice *dev, int loc,
+ bool force)
+{
+ const u8 mask = TPM_ACCESS_REQUEST_PENDING | TPM_ACCESS_VALID;
+ u8 buf;
+
+ if (tpm_tis_spi_read(dev, TPM_ACCESS(loc), &buf, 1) < 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (force || (buf & mask) == mask) {
+ buf = TPM_ACCESS_ACTIVE_LOCALITY;
+ tpm_tis_spi_write(dev, TPM_ACCESS(loc), &buf, 1);
+ }
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_request_locality(struct udevice *dev, int loc)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+ unsigned long start, stop;
+ u8 buf = TPM_ACCESS_REQUEST_USE;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_check_locality(dev, loc);
+ if (!ret)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (ret != -ENOENT) {
+ debug("%s: Failed to get locality: %d\n", __func__, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_write(dev, TPM_ACCESS(loc), &buf, 1);
+ if (ret) {
+ debug("%s: Failed to write to TPM: %d\n", __func__, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ start = get_timer(0);
+ stop = chip->timeout_a;
+ do {
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_check_locality(dev, loc);
+ if (!ret)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (ret != -ENOENT) {
+ debug("%s: Failed to get locality: %d\n", __func__,
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ mdelay(TPM_TIMEOUT_MS);
+ } while (get_timer(start) < stop);
+ debug("%s: Timeout getting locality: %d\n", __func__, ret);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * tpm_tis_spi_status return the TPM_STS register
+ * @dev: the device
+ * @status: storage parameter
+ * @return: 0 on success, a negative error otherwise
+ */
+static u8 tpm_tis_spi_status(struct udevice *dev, u8 *status)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+
+ return tpm_tis_spi_read(dev, TPM_STS(chip->locality), status, 1);
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_wait_for_stat(struct udevice *dev, u8 mask,
+ unsigned long timeout, u8 *status)
+{
+ unsigned long start = get_timer(0);
+ unsigned long stop = timeout;
+ int ret;
+
+ do {
+ mdelay(TPM_TIMEOUT_MS);
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_status(dev, status);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if ((*status & mask) == mask)
+ return 0;
+ } while (get_timer(start) < stop);
+
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+}
+
+/*
+ * tpm_tis_spi_get_burstcount return the burstcount address 0x19 0x1A
+ * @param: chip, the chip description
+ * return: the burstcount or -TPM_DRIVER_ERR in case of error.
+ */
+static int tpm_tis_spi_get_burstcount(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+ unsigned long start, stop;
+ u32 burstcount, ret;
+
+ /* wait for burstcount */
+ start = get_timer(0);
+ stop = chip->timeout_d;
+ do {
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_read32(dev, TPM_STS(chip->locality),
+ &burstcount);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ burstcount = (burstcount >> 8) & 0xFFFF;
+ if (burstcount)
+ return burstcount;
+
+ mdelay(TPM_TIMEOUT_MS);
+ } while (get_timer(start) < stop);
+
+ return -EBUSY;
+}
+
+/*
+ * tpm_tis_spi_cancel, cancel the current command execution or
+ * set STS to COMMAND READY.
+ * @param: chip, tpm_chip description.
+ */
+static int tpm_tis_spi_cancel(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+ u8 data = TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY;
+
+ return tpm_tis_spi_write(dev, TPM_STS(chip->locality), &data, 1);
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_recv_data(struct udevice *dev, u8 *buf, size_t count)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+ int size = 0, burstcnt, len, ret;
+ u8 status;
+
+ while (size < count &&
+ tpm_tis_spi_wait_for_stat(dev,
+ TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
+ chip->timeout_c, &status) == 0) {
+ burstcnt = tpm_tis_spi_get_burstcount(dev);
+ if (burstcnt < 0)
+ return burstcnt;
+
+ len = min_t(int, burstcnt, count - size);
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_read(dev, TPM_DATA_FIFO(chip->locality),
+ buf + size, len);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ size += len;
+ }
+
+ return size;
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_recv(struct udevice *dev, u8 *buf, size_t count)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+ int size, expected;
+
+ if (!chip)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (count < TPM_HEADER_SIZE) {
+ size = -EIO;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ size = tpm_tis_spi_recv_data(dev, buf, TPM_HEADER_SIZE);
+ if (size < TPM_HEADER_SIZE) {
+ debug("TPM error, unable to read header\n");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ expected = get_unaligned_be32(buf + 2);
+ if (expected > count) {
+ size = -EIO;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ size += tpm_tis_spi_recv_data(dev, &buf[TPM_HEADER_SIZE],
+ expected - TPM_HEADER_SIZE);
+ if (size < expected) {
+ debug("TPM error, unable to read remaining bytes of result\n");
+ size = -EIO;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+out:
+ tpm_tis_spi_cancel(dev);
+ tpm_tis_spi_release_locality(dev, chip->locality, false);
+
+ return size;
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_send(struct udevice *dev, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+ u32 i, size;
+ u8 status;
+ int burstcnt, ret;
+ u8 data;
+
+ if (!chip)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (len > TPM_DEV_BUFSIZE)
+ return -E2BIG; /* Command is too long for our tpm, sorry */
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_request_locality(dev, 0);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ /*
+ * Check if the TPM is ready. If not, if not, cancel the pending command
+ * and poll on the status to be finally ready.
+ */
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_status(dev, &status);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (!(status & TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY)) {
+ /* Force the transition, usually this will be done@startup */
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_cancel(dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ debug("%s: Could not cancel previous operation\n",
+ __func__);
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_wait_for_stat(dev, TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY,
+ chip->timeout_b, &status);
+ if (ret < 0 || !(status & TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY)) {
+ debug("status %d after wait for stat returned %d\n",
+ status, ret);
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len - 1;) {
+ burstcnt = tpm_tis_spi_get_burstcount(dev);
+ if (burstcnt < 0)
+ return burstcnt;
+
+ size = min_t(int, len - i - 1, burstcnt);
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_write(dev, TPM_DATA_FIFO(chip->locality),
+ buf + i, size);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto out_err;
+
+ i += size;
+ }
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_status(dev, &status);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_err;
+
+ if ((status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) == 0) {
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_write(dev, TPM_DATA_FIFO(chip->locality),
+ buf + len - 1, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_err;
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_status(dev, &status);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_err;
+
+ if ((status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) != 0) {
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+
+ data = TPM_STS_GO;
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_write(dev, TPM_STS(chip->locality), &data, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_err;
+
+ return len;
+
+out_err:
+ tpm_tis_spi_cancel(dev);
+ tpm_tis_spi_release_locality(dev, chip->locality, false);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_cleanup(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+
+ tpm_tis_spi_cancel(dev);
+ /*
+ * The TPM needs some time to clean up here,
+ * so we sleep rather than keeping the bus busy
+ */
+ mdelay(2);
+ tpm_tis_spi_release_locality(dev, chip->locality, false);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_open(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+
+ if (chip->is_open)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ chip->is_open = 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_close(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+
+ if (chip->is_open) {
+ tpm_tis_spi_release_locality(dev, chip->locality, true);
+ chip->is_open = 0;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_get_desc(struct udevice *dev, char *buf, int size)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+
+ if (size < 80)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ return snprintf(buf, size,
+ "%s v2.0: VendorID 0x%04x, DeviceID 0x%04x, RevisionID 0x%02x [%s]",
+ dev->name, chip->vend_dev & 0xFFFF,
+ chip->vend_dev >> 16, chip->rid,
+ (chip->is_open ? "open" : "closed"));
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_wait_init(struct udevice *dev, int loc)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+ unsigned long start, stop;
+ u8 status;
+ int ret;
+
+ start = get_timer(0);
+ stop = chip->timeout_b;
+ do {
+ mdelay(TPM_TIMEOUT_MS);
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_read(dev, TPM_ACCESS(loc), &status, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+
+ if (status & TPM_ACCESS_VALID)
+ return 0;
+ } while (get_timer(start) < stop);
+
+ return -EIO;
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_probe(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ chip->chip_type = dev_get_driver_data(dev);
+ chip->locality = 0;
+ chip->timeout_a = TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT_MS;
+ chip->timeout_b = TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT_MS;
+ chip->timeout_c = TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT_MS;
+ chip->timeout_d = TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT_MS;
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_wait_init(dev, chip->locality);
+ if (ret) {
+ debug("%s: no device found\n", __func__);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_request_locality(dev, chip->locality);
+ if (ret) {
+ debug("%s: could not request locality %d\n", __func__,
+ chip->locality);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_read32(dev, TPM_DID_VID(chip->locality),
+ &chip->vend_dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ debug("%s: could not retrieve VendorID/DeviceID\n", __func__);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = tpm_tis_spi_read(dev, TPM_RID(chip->locality), &chip->rid, 1);
+ if (ret) {
+ debug("%s: could not retrieve RevisionID\n", __func__);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ debug("SPI TPMv2.0 found (vid:%04x, did:%04x, rid:%02x)\n",
+ chip->vend_dev & 0xFFFF, chip->vend_dev >> 16, chip->rid);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tpm_tis_spi_remove(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+ struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_priv(dev);
+
+ tpm_tis_spi_release_locality(dev, chip->locality, true);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct tpm_ops tpm_tis_spi_ops = {
+ .open = tpm_tis_spi_open,
+ .close = tpm_tis_spi_close,
+ .get_desc = tpm_tis_get_desc,
+ .send = tpm_tis_spi_send,
+ .recv = tpm_tis_spi_recv,
+ .cleanup = tpm_tis_spi_cleanup,
+};
+
+static const struct udevice_id tpm_tis_spi_ids[] = {
+ { .compatible = "st,st33tphf20-spi" },
+ { }
+};
+
+U_BOOT_DRIVER(tpm_tis_spi) = {
+ .name = "tpm_tis_spi",
+ .id = UCLASS_TPM,
+ .of_match = tpm_tis_spi_ids,
+ .ops = &tpm_tis_spi_ops,
+ .probe = tpm_tis_spi_probe,
+ .remove = tpm_tis_spi_remove,
+ .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct tpm_chip),
+};
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/18] tpm: fix indentation in command list before adding more
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/18] tpm: add support for TPMv2 SPI modules Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/18] tpm: prepare support for TPMv2 commands Miquel Raynal
` (14 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Prepare the addition of more commands by first indenting correctly the
current list.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index d9b433582c..f456396d75 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -820,45 +820,45 @@ static int do_tpm_list(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
static cmd_tbl_t tpm_commands[] = {
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(info, 0, 1, do_tpm_info, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(init, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_init, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_init, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(startup, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_startup, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_startup, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(self_test_full, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_self_test_full, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_self_test_full, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(continue_self_test, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_continue_self_test, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_continue_self_test, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(force_clear, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_force_clear, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_force_clear, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(physical_enable, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_physical_enable, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_physical_enable, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(physical_disable, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_physical_disable, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_physical_disable, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(nv_define_space, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_nv_define_space, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_nv_define_space, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(nv_read_value, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_nv_read_value, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_nv_read_value, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(nv_write_value, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_nv_write_value, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_nv_write_value, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(extend, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_extend, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_extend, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_read, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_pcr_read, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_pcr_read, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(tsc_physical_presence, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_tsc_physical_presence, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_tsc_physical_presence, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(read_pubek, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_read_pubek, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_read_pubek, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(physical_set_deactivated, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_physical_set_deactivated, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_physical_set_deactivated, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(get_capability, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_get_capability, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_get_capability, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(raw_transfer, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_raw_transfer, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_raw_transfer, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(nv_define, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_nv_define, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_nv_define, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(nv_read, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_nv_read, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_nv_read, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(nv_write, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_nv_write, "", ""),
+ do_tpm_nv_write, "", ""),
#ifdef CONFIG_TPM_AUTH_SESSIONS
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(oiap, 0, 1,
do_tpm_oiap, "", ""),
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/18] tpm: prepare support for TPMv2 commands
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/18] tpm: fix indentation in command list before adding more Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/18] tpm: add macros " Miquel Raynal
` (13 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Later choice between v1 and v2 compliant functions will be handled by a
global value in lib/tpm.c that will be accessible through set/get
accessors from lib/cmd.c.
This global value is set during the initialization phase if the TPM2
handle is given to the init command.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/tpm.h | 20 ++++++++++++++
lib/tpm.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index f456396d75..1d32028b64 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -89,12 +89,16 @@ static void *parse_byte_string(char *bytes, uint8_t *data, size_t *count_ptr)
*/
static int report_return_code(int return_code)
{
- if (return_code) {
- printf("Error: %d\n", return_code);
- return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
- } else {
+ if (!return_code)
return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
- }
+
+ if (return_code == -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ printf("TPMv%d error: unavailable command with this spec\n",
+ tpm_get_specification());
+ else
+ printf("TPM error: %d\n", return_code);
+
+ return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
}
/**
@@ -427,6 +431,24 @@ static int do_tpm_get_capability(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
return report_return_code(rc);
}
+static int do_tpm_init(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
+ int argc, char * const argv[])
+{
+ if (argc > 2)
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ if (argc == 2) {
+ if (!strcasecmp("TPM1", argv[1]))
+ tpm_set_specification(1);
+ else if (!strcasecmp("TPM2", argv[1]))
+ tpm_set_specification(2);
+ else
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+ }
+
+ return report_return_code(tpm_init());
+}
+
#define TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(cmd) \
static int do_##cmd(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, \
int argc, char * const argv[]) \
@@ -436,7 +458,6 @@ static int do_##cmd(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, \
return report_return_code(cmd()); \
}
-TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(tpm_init)
TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(tpm_self_test_full)
TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(tpm_continue_self_test)
TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(tpm_force_clear)
@@ -902,8 +923,10 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_tpm,
" - Issue TPM command <cmd> with arguments <args...>.\n"
"Admin Startup and State Commands:\n"
" info - Show information about the TPM\n"
-" init\n"
+" init [<type>]\n"
" - Put TPM into a state where it waits for 'startup' command.\n"
+" <type> is one of TPM1 (default) or TPM2. This choice impacts the way\n"
+" other functions will behave.\n"
" startup mode\n"
" - Issue TPM_Starup command. <mode> is one of TPM_ST_CLEAR,\n"
" TPM_ST_STATE, and TPM_ST_DEACTIVATED.\n"
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index 760d94865c..0ec3428ea4 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ enum tpm_startup_type {
TPM_ST_DEACTIVATED = 0x0003,
};
+enum tpm2_startup_types {
+ TPM2_SU_CLEAR = 0x0000,
+ TPM2_SU_STATE = 0x0001,
+};
+
enum tpm_physical_presence {
TPM_PHYSICAL_PRESENCE_HW_DISABLE = 0x0200,
TPM_PHYSICAL_PRESENCE_CMD_DISABLE = 0x0100,
@@ -417,6 +422,21 @@ int tpm_xfer(struct udevice *dev, const uint8_t *sendbuf, size_t send_size,
*/
int tpm_init(void);
+/**
+ * Assign a value to the global is_nfcv2 boolean to discriminate in the lib
+ * between the available specifications.
+ *
+ * @version: 1 or 2, depending on the supported specification
+ */
+int tpm_set_specification(int version);
+
+/**
+ * Return the current value of the specification.
+ *
+ * @return: 1 or 2, depending on the supported specification
+ */
+int tpm_get_specification(void);
+
/**
* Issue a TPM_Startup command.
*
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index 99556b1cf6..38b76b4961 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
/* Internal error of TPM command library */
#define TPM_LIB_ERROR ((uint32_t)~0u)
+/* Global boolean to discriminate TPMv2.x from TPMv1.x functions */
+static bool is_tpmv2;
+
/* Useful constants */
enum {
COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE = 256,
@@ -262,6 +265,26 @@ static uint32_t tpm_sendrecv_command(const void *command,
return tpm_return_code(response);
}
+int tpm_set_specification(int version)
+{
+ if (version == 1) {
+ debug("TPM complies to the v1.x specification\n");
+ is_tpmv2 = false;
+ } else if (version == 2) {
+ debug("TPM complies to the v2.x specification\n");
+ is_tpmv2 = true;
+ } else {
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int tpm_get_specification(void)
+{
+ return is_tpmv2 ? 2 : 1;
+}
+
int tpm_init(void)
{
int err;
@@ -338,6 +361,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_nv_define_space(uint32_t index, uint32_t perm, uint32_t size)
const size_t size_offset = 77;
uint8_t buf[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE];
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "sddd",
0, command, sizeof(command),
index_offset, index,
@@ -362,6 +388,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_nv_read_value(uint32_t index, void *data, uint32_t count)
uint32_t data_size;
uint32_t err;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "sdd",
0, command, sizeof(command),
index_offset, index,
@@ -398,6 +427,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_nv_write_value(uint32_t index, const void *data, uint32_t length)
size_t response_length = sizeof(response);
uint32_t err;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "sddds",
0, command, sizeof(command),
command_size_offset, total_length,
@@ -425,6 +457,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_extend(uint32_t index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest)
size_t response_length = sizeof(response);
uint32_t err;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "sds",
0, command, sizeof(command),
index_offset, index,
@@ -454,8 +489,8 @@ uint32_t tpm_pcr_read(uint32_t index, void *data, size_t count)
size_t response_length = sizeof(response);
uint32_t err;
- if (count < PCR_DIGEST_LENGTH)
- return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "sd",
0, command, sizeof(command),
@@ -479,6 +514,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_tsc_physical_presence(uint16_t presence)
const size_t presence_offset = 10;
uint8_t buf[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE];
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "sw",
0, command, sizeof(command),
presence_offset, presence))
@@ -500,6 +538,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_read_pubek(void *data, size_t count)
uint32_t data_size;
uint32_t err;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
err = tpm_sendrecv_command(command, response, &response_length);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -533,6 +574,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_physical_enable(void)
0x0, 0xc1, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xa, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x6f,
};
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
return tpm_sendrecv_command(command, NULL, NULL);
}
@@ -542,6 +586,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_physical_disable(void)
0x0, 0xc1, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xa, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x70,
};
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
return tpm_sendrecv_command(command, NULL, NULL);
}
@@ -553,6 +600,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_physical_set_deactivated(uint8_t state)
const size_t state_offset = 10;
uint8_t buf[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE];
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "sb",
0, command, sizeof(command),
state_offset, state))
@@ -618,6 +668,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_get_permanent_flags(struct tpm_permanent_flags *pflags)
uint32_t err;
uint32_t data_size;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
err = tpm_sendrecv_command(command, response, &response_length);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -648,6 +701,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_get_permissions(uint32_t index, uint32_t *perm)
size_t response_length = sizeof(response);
uint32_t err;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "d", 0, command, sizeof(command),
index_offset, index))
return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
@@ -677,6 +733,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_flush_specific(uint32_t key_handle, uint32_t resource_type)
size_t response_length = sizeof(response);
uint32_t err;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "sdd",
0, command, sizeof(command),
key_handle_offset, key_handle,
@@ -835,6 +894,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_terminate_auth_session(uint32_t auth_handle)
const size_t req_handle_offset = TPM_REQUEST_HEADER_LENGTH;
uint8_t request[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE];
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (pack_byte_string(request, sizeof(request), "sd",
0, command, sizeof(command),
req_handle_offset, auth_handle))
@@ -848,8 +910,13 @@ uint32_t tpm_terminate_auth_session(uint32_t auth_handle)
uint32_t tpm_end_oiap(void)
{
uint32_t err = TPM_SUCCESS;
+
if (oiap_session.valid)
err = tpm_terminate_auth_session(oiap_session.handle);
+
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
return err;
}
@@ -866,6 +933,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_oiap(uint32_t *auth_handle)
size_t response_length = sizeof(response);
uint32_t err;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (oiap_session.valid)
tpm_terminate_auth_session(oiap_session.handle);
@@ -904,6 +974,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_load_key2_oiap(uint32_t parent_handle,
size_t response_length = sizeof(response);
uint32_t err;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (!oiap_session.valid) {
err = tpm_oiap(NULL);
if (err)
@@ -967,6 +1040,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_get_pub_key_oiap(uint32_t key_handle, const void *usage_auth,
size_t response_length = sizeof(response);
uint32_t err;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (!oiap_session.valid) {
err = tpm_oiap(NULL);
if (err)
@@ -1025,6 +1101,9 @@ uint32_t tpm_find_key_sha1(const uint8_t auth[20], const uint8_t
size_t buf_len;
unsigned int i;
+ if (is_tpmv2)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
/* fetch list of already loaded keys in the TPM */
err = tpm_get_capability(TPM_CAP_HANDLE, TPM_RT_KEY, buf, sizeof(buf));
if (err)
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/18] tpm: add macros for TPMv2 commands
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/18] tpm: prepare support for TPMv2 commands Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/18] tpm: add possible traces to analyze buffers returned by the TPM Miquel Raynal
` (12 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
TPM commands are much easier to handle with these macros that will
transform words or integers into byte string. This way, there is no need
to call pack_byte_string() while all variable length in a command are
known (and at must 4 bytes, which is a lot of them).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
lib/tpm.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index 38b76b4961..1b3a112311 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@
/* Internal error of TPM command library */
#define TPM_LIB_ERROR ((uint32_t)~0u)
+/* To make strings of commands more easily */
+#define __MSB(x) ((x) >> 8)
+#define __LSB(x) ((x) & 0xFF)
+#define STRINGIFY16(x) __MSB(x), __LSB(x)
+#define STRINGIFY32(x) STRINGIFY16((x) >> 16), STRINGIFY16((x) & 0xFFFF)
+
/* Global boolean to discriminate TPMv2.x from TPMv1.x functions */
static bool is_tpmv2;
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/18] tpm: add possible traces to analyze buffers returned by the TPM
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/18] tpm: add macros " Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/18] tpm: handle different buffer sizes Miquel Raynal
` (11 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
When debugging, it is welcome to get more information about what the TPM
returns. Add the possibility to print the packets received to show their
exact content.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
lib/tpm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index 1b3a112311..c32fc51ff9 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ static uint32_t tpm_sendrecv_command(const void *command,
int err, ret;
uint8_t response_buffer[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE];
size_t response_length;
+ int i;
if (response) {
response_length = *size_ptr;
@@ -260,15 +261,24 @@ static uint32_t tpm_sendrecv_command(const void *command,
ret = uclass_first_device_err(UCLASS_TPM, &dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
+
err = tpm_xfer(dev, command, tpm_command_size(command),
response, &response_length);
if (err < 0)
return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
if (size_ptr)
*size_ptr = response_length;
- return tpm_return_code(response);
+ ret = tpm_return_code(response);
+
+ debug("TPM response [ret:%d]: ", ret);
+ for (i = 0; i < response_length; i++)
+ debug("%02x ", ((u8 *)response)[i]);
+ debug("\n");
+
+ return ret;
}
int tpm_set_specification(int version)
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/18] tpm: handle different buffer sizes
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/18] tpm: add possible traces to analyze buffers returned by the TPM Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/18] tpm: add TPM2_Startup command support Miquel Raynal
` (10 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Usual buffer sizes for TPMv1 and TPMv2 are different. Change TPMv1
buffer size definition for that and declare another size for TPMv2
buffers.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 5 +++--
include/tpm.h | 2 ++
lib/tpm.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index 1d32028b64..3e2bb3b118 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -323,8 +323,9 @@ static int do_tpm_nv_write_value(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
static int do_tpm_extend(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
int argc, char * const argv[])
{
+ uint8_t in_digest[TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH];
+ uint8_t out_digest[TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH];
uint32_t index, rc;
- uint8_t in_digest[20], out_digest[20];
if (argc != 3)
return CMD_RET_USAGE;
@@ -337,7 +338,7 @@ static int do_tpm_extend(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
rc = tpm_extend(index, in_digest, out_digest);
if (!rc) {
puts("PCR value after execution of the command:\n");
- print_byte_string(out_digest, sizeof(out_digest));
+ print_byte_string(out_digest, TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH);
}
return report_return_code(rc);
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index 0ec3428ea4..1a60ef5b36 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
*/
#define TPM_HEADER_SIZE 10
+#define TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH 20
+#define TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH 32
enum tpm_duration {
TPM_SHORT = 0,
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index c32fc51ff9..f8e99a1e91 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ enum {
COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE = 256,
TPM_REQUEST_HEADER_LENGTH = 10,
TPM_RESPONSE_HEADER_LENGTH = 10,
- PCR_DIGEST_LENGTH = 20,
- DIGEST_LENGTH = 20,
TPM_REQUEST_AUTH_LENGTH = 45,
TPM_RESPONSE_AUTH_LENGTH = 41,
/* some max lengths, valid for RSA keys <= 2048 bits */
@@ -47,8 +45,8 @@ enum {
struct session_data {
int valid;
uint32_t handle;
- uint8_t nonce_even[DIGEST_LENGTH];
- uint8_t nonce_odd[DIGEST_LENGTH];
+ uint8_t nonce_even[TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH];
+ uint8_t nonce_odd[TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH];
};
static struct session_data oiap_session = {0, };
@@ -469,7 +467,7 @@ uint32_t tpm_extend(uint32_t index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest)
const size_t in_digest_offset = 14;
const size_t out_digest_offset = 10;
uint8_t buf[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE];
- uint8_t response[TPM_RESPONSE_HEADER_LENGTH + PCR_DIGEST_LENGTH];
+ uint8_t response[TPM_RESPONSE_HEADER_LENGTH + TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH];
size_t response_length = sizeof(response);
uint32_t err;
@@ -477,18 +475,18 @@ uint32_t tpm_extend(uint32_t index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "sds",
- 0, command, sizeof(command),
- index_offset, index,
- in_digest_offset, in_digest,
- PCR_DIGEST_LENGTH))
+ 0, command, sizeof(command),
+ index_offset, index,
+ in_digest_offset, in_digest,
+ TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH))
return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
err = tpm_sendrecv_command(buf, response, &response_length);
if (err)
return err;
if (unpack_byte_string(response, response_length, "s",
- out_digest_offset, out_digest,
- PCR_DIGEST_LENGTH))
+ out_digest_offset, out_digest,
+ TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH))
return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
return 0;
@@ -516,7 +514,7 @@ uint32_t tpm_pcr_read(uint32_t index, void *data, size_t count)
if (err)
return err;
if (unpack_byte_string(response, response_length, "s",
- out_digest_offset, data, PCR_DIGEST_LENGTH))
+ out_digest_offset, data, TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH))
return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
return 0;
@@ -784,7 +782,7 @@ static uint32_t create_request_auth(const void *request, size_t request_len0,
struct session_data *auth_session,
void *request_auth, const void *auth)
{
- uint8_t hmac_data[DIGEST_LENGTH * 3 + 1];
+ uint8_t hmac_data[TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH * 3 + 1];
sha1_context hash_ctx;
const size_t command_code_offset = 6;
const size_t auth_nonce_odd_offset = 4;
@@ -804,25 +802,25 @@ static uint32_t create_request_auth(const void *request, size_t request_len0,
sha1_finish(&hash_ctx, hmac_data);
sha1_starts(&hash_ctx);
- sha1_update(&hash_ctx, auth_session->nonce_odd, DIGEST_LENGTH);
+ sha1_update(&hash_ctx, auth_session->nonce_odd, TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH);
sha1_update(&hash_ctx, hmac_data, sizeof(hmac_data));
sha1_finish(&hash_ctx, auth_session->nonce_odd);
if (pack_byte_string(request_auth, TPM_REQUEST_AUTH_LENGTH, "dsb",
0, auth_session->handle,
auth_nonce_odd_offset, auth_session->nonce_odd,
- DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH,
auth_continue_offset, 1))
return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
if (pack_byte_string(hmac_data, sizeof(hmac_data), "ss",
- DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH,
auth_session->nonce_even,
- DIGEST_LENGTH,
- 2 * DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ 2 * TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH,
request_auth + auth_nonce_odd_offset,
- DIGEST_LENGTH + 1))
+ TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH + 1))
return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
- sha1_hmac(auth, DIGEST_LENGTH, hmac_data, sizeof(hmac_data),
+ sha1_hmac(auth, TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH, hmac_data, sizeof(hmac_data),
request_auth + auth_auth_offset);
return TPM_SUCCESS;
@@ -848,8 +846,8 @@ static uint32_t verify_response_auth(uint32_t command_code,
struct session_data *auth_session,
const void *response_auth, const void *auth)
{
- uint8_t hmac_data[DIGEST_LENGTH * 3 + 1];
- uint8_t computed_auth[DIGEST_LENGTH];
+ uint8_t hmac_data[TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH * 3 + 1];
+ uint8_t computed_auth[TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH];
sha1_context hash_ctx;
const size_t return_code_offset = 6;
const size_t auth_continue_offset = 20;
@@ -874,24 +872,24 @@ static uint32_t verify_response_auth(uint32_t command_code,
- handles_len);
sha1_finish(&hash_ctx, hmac_data);
- memcpy(auth_session->nonce_even, response_auth, DIGEST_LENGTH);
+ memcpy(auth_session->nonce_even, response_auth, TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH);
auth_continue = ((uint8_t *)response_auth)[auth_continue_offset];
if (pack_byte_string(hmac_data, sizeof(hmac_data), "ssb",
- DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH,
response_auth,
- DIGEST_LENGTH,
- 2 * DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ 2 * TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH,
auth_session->nonce_odd,
- DIGEST_LENGTH,
- 3 * DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ 3 * TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH,
auth_continue))
return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
- sha1_hmac(auth, DIGEST_LENGTH, hmac_data, sizeof(hmac_data),
+ sha1_hmac(auth, TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH, hmac_data, sizeof(hmac_data),
computed_auth);
if (memcmp(computed_auth, response_auth + auth_auth_offset,
- DIGEST_LENGTH))
+ TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH))
return TPM_AUTHFAIL;
return TPM_SUCCESS;
@@ -961,7 +959,7 @@ uint32_t tpm_oiap(uint32_t *auth_handle)
if (unpack_byte_string(response, response_length, "ds",
res_auth_handle_offset, &oiap_session.handle,
res_nonce_even_offset, &oiap_session.nonce_even,
- (uint32_t)DIGEST_LENGTH))
+ (uint32_t)TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH))
return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
oiap_session.valid = 1;
if (auth_handle)
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/18] tpm: add TPM2_Startup command support
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/18] tpm: handle different buffer sizes Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/18] tpm: add TPM2_SelfTest " Miquel Raynal
` (9 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add support for the TPM2_Startup command.
Change the command file and the help accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 9 +++++++--
include/tpm.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
lib/tpm.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index 3e2bb3b118..fc9ef9d4a3 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -255,6 +255,10 @@ static int do_tpm_startup(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
mode = TPM_ST_STATE;
} else if (!strcasecmp("TPM_ST_DEACTIVATED", argv[1])) {
mode = TPM_ST_DEACTIVATED;
+ } else if (!strcasecmp("TPM2_SU_CLEAR", argv[1])) {
+ mode = TPM2_SU_CLEAR;
+ } else if (!strcasecmp("TPM2_SU_STATE", argv[1])) {
+ mode = TPM2_SU_STATE;
} else {
printf("Couldn't recognize mode string: %s\n", argv[1]);
return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
@@ -929,8 +933,9 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_tpm,
" <type> is one of TPM1 (default) or TPM2. This choice impacts the way\n"
" other functions will behave.\n"
" startup mode\n"
-" - Issue TPM_Starup command. <mode> is one of TPM_ST_CLEAR,\n"
-" TPM_ST_STATE, and TPM_ST_DEACTIVATED.\n"
+" - Issue TPM_Startup command. <mode> is one of:\n"
+" * TPM_ST_CLEAR, TPM_ST_STATE, TPM_ST_DEACTIVATED for TPMv1.x.\n"
+" * TPM2_SU_CLEAR, TPM2_SU_STATE, for TPMv2.x.\n"
"Admin Testing Commands:\n"
" self_test_full\n"
" - Test all of the TPM capabilities.\n"
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index 1a60ef5b36..ba71bac885 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ enum tpm_duration {
TPM_DURATION_COUNT,
};
+enum tpm2_structures {
+ TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS = 0x8001,
+ TPM2_ST_SESSIONS = 0x8002,
+};
+
enum tpm_startup_type {
TPM_ST_CLEAR = 0x0001,
TPM_ST_STATE = 0x0002,
@@ -37,6 +42,25 @@ enum tpm2_startup_types {
TPM2_SU_STATE = 0x0001,
};
+enum tpm2_command_codes {
+ TPM2_CC_STARTUP = 0x0144,
+ TPM2_CC_SELF_TEST = 0x0143,
+ TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY = 0x017A,
+ TPM2_CC_PCR_READ = 0x017E,
+ TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND = 0x0182,
+};
+
+enum tpm2_return_codes {
+ TPM2_RC_SUCCESS = 0x0000,
+ TPM2_RC_HASH = 0x0083, /* RC_FMT1 */
+ TPM2_RC_HANDLE = 0x008B,
+ TPM2_RC_INITIALIZE = 0x0100, /* RC_VER1 */
+ TPM2_RC_DISABLED = 0x0120,
+ TPM2_RC_TESTING = 0x090A, /* RC_WARN */
+ TPM2_RC_REFERENCE_H0 = 0x0910,
+ TPM2_RC_LOCKOUT = 0x0921,
+};
+
enum tpm_physical_presence {
TPM_PHYSICAL_PRESENCE_HW_DISABLE = 0x0200,
TPM_PHYSICAL_PRESENCE_CMD_DISABLE = 0x0100,
@@ -445,7 +469,7 @@ int tpm_get_specification(void);
* @param mode TPM startup mode
* @return return code of the operation
*/
-uint32_t tpm_startup(enum tpm_startup_type mode);
+int tpm_startup(enum tpm_startup_type mode);
/**
* Issue a TPM_SelfTestFull command.
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index f8e99a1e91..cd97ac7eb5 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -310,20 +310,35 @@ int tpm_init(void)
return tpm_open(dev);
}
-uint32_t tpm_startup(enum tpm_startup_type mode)
+int tpm_startup(enum tpm_startup_type mode)
{
- const uint8_t command[12] = {
- 0x0, 0xc1, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x99, 0x0, 0x0,
+ const u8 command_v1[12] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(0xc1),
+ STRINGIFY32(12),
+ STRINGIFY32(0x99),
+ STRINGIFY16(mode),
};
- const size_t mode_offset = 10;
- uint8_t buf[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE];
+ const u8 command_v2[12] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS),
+ STRINGIFY32(12),
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_STARTUP),
+ STRINGIFY16(mode),
+ };
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ return tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v1, NULL, NULL);
+
+ ret = tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, NULL, NULL);
- if (pack_byte_string(buf, sizeof(buf), "sw",
- 0, command, sizeof(command),
- mode_offset, mode))
- return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+ /*
+ * Note TPMv2: STARTUP command will return RC_SUCCESS the first time,
+ * but will return RC_INITIALIZE otherwise.
+ */
+ if (ret && ret != TPM2_RC_INITIALIZE)
+ return ret;
- return tpm_sendrecv_command(buf, NULL, NULL);
+ return 0;
}
uint32_t tpm_self_test_full(void)
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/18] tpm: add TPM2_SelfTest command support
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/18] tpm: add TPM2_Startup command support Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/18] tpm: add TPM2_Clear " Miquel Raynal
` (8 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add support for the TPM2_Selftest command.
Change the command file and the help accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
include/tpm.h | 9 +++++++--
lib/tpm.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index ba71bac885..38d7cb899d 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ enum tpm2_structures {
TPM2_ST_SESSIONS = 0x8002,
};
+enum tpm2_yes_no {
+ TPMI_YES = 1,
+ TPMI_NO = 0,
+};
+
enum tpm_startup_type {
TPM_ST_CLEAR = 0x0001,
TPM_ST_STATE = 0x0002,
@@ -476,14 +481,14 @@ int tpm_startup(enum tpm_startup_type mode);
*
* @return return code of the operation
*/
-uint32_t tpm_self_test_full(void);
+int tpm_self_test_full(void);
/**
* Issue a TPM_ContinueSelfTest command.
*
* @return return code of the operation
*/
-uint32_t tpm_continue_self_test(void);
+int tpm_continue_self_test(void);
/**
* Issue a TPM_NV_DefineSpace command. The implementation is limited
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index cd97ac7eb5..7b379b99aa 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -341,20 +341,40 @@ int tpm_startup(enum tpm_startup_type mode)
return 0;
}
-uint32_t tpm_self_test_full(void)
+int tpm_self_test_full(void)
{
- const uint8_t command[10] = {
- 0x0, 0xc1, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xa, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x50,
+ const u8 command_v1[10] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(0xc1),
+ STRINGIFY32(10),
+ STRINGIFY32(0x50),
};
- return tpm_sendrecv_command(command, NULL, NULL);
+ const u8 command_v2[12] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS),
+ STRINGIFY32(11),
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_SELF_TEST),
+ TPMI_YES,
+ };
+
+ return tpm_sendrecv_command(is_tpmv2 ? command_v2 : command_v1, NULL,
+ NULL);
}
-uint32_t tpm_continue_self_test(void)
+int tpm_continue_self_test(void)
{
- const uint8_t command[10] = {
- 0x0, 0xc1, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xa, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x53,
+ const u8 command_v1[10] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(0xc1),
+ STRINGIFY32(10),
+ STRINGIFY32(0x53),
};
- return tpm_sendrecv_command(command, NULL, NULL);
+ const u8 command_v2[12] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS),
+ STRINGIFY32(11),
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_SELF_TEST),
+ TPMI_NO,
+ };
+
+ return tpm_sendrecv_command(is_tpmv2 ? command_v2 : command_v1, NULL,
+ NULL);
}
uint32_t tpm_nv_define_space(uint32_t index, uint32_t perm, uint32_t size)
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/18] tpm: add TPM2_Clear command support
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/18] tpm: add TPM2_SelfTest " Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/18] tpm: rename the _extend() function to be _pcr_event() Miquel Raynal
` (7 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add support for the TPM2_Clear command.
Change the command file and the help accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
cmd/tpm_test.c | 6 +++---
include/tpm.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
lib/tpm.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index fc9ef9d4a3..32921e1a70 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -454,6 +454,29 @@ static int do_tpm_init(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
return report_return_code(tpm_init());
}
+static int do_tpm_force_clear(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
+ int argc, char * const argv[])
+{
+ u32 handle = 0;
+ const char *pw = (argc < 3) ? NULL : argv[2];
+ const ssize_t pw_sz = pw ? strlen(pw) : 0;
+
+ if (argc < 2 || argc > 3)
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ if (pw_sz > TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!strcasecmp("TPM2_RH_LOCKOUT", argv[1]))
+ handle = TPM2_RH_LOCKOUT;
+ else if (!strcasecmp("TPM2_RH_PLATFORM", argv[1]))
+ handle = TPM2_RH_PLATFORM;
+ else
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ return report_return_code(tpm_force_clear(handle, pw, pw_sz));
+}
+
#define TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(cmd) \
static int do_##cmd(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, \
int argc, char * const argv[]) \
@@ -465,7 +488,6 @@ static int do_##cmd(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, \
TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(tpm_self_test_full)
TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(tpm_continue_self_test)
-TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(tpm_force_clear)
TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(tpm_physical_enable)
TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(tpm_physical_disable)
@@ -951,8 +973,9 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_tpm,
" physical_set_deactivated 0|1\n"
" - Set deactivated flag.\n"
"Admin Ownership Commands:\n"
-" force_clear\n"
-" - Issue TPM_ForceClear command.\n"
+" force_clear [<type>]\n"
+" - Issue TPM_[Force]Clear command, with <type> one of (TPMv2 only):\n"
+" * TPM2_RH_LOCKOUT, TPM2_RH_PLATFORM.\n"
" tsc_physical_presence flags\n"
" - Set TPM device's Physical Presence flags to <flags>.\n"
"The Capability Commands:\n"
diff --git a/cmd/tpm_test.c b/cmd/tpm_test.c
index 37ad2ff33d..da40dbc423 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm_test.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm_test.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int test_fast_enable(void)
TPM_CHECK(tpm_get_flags(&disable, &deactivated, NULL));
printf("\tdisable is %d, deactivated is %d\n", disable, deactivated);
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
- TPM_CHECK(tpm_force_clear());
+ TPM_CHECK(tpm_force_clear(0, NULL, 0));
TPM_CHECK(tpm_get_flags(&disable, &deactivated, NULL));
printf("\tdisable is %d, deactivated is %d\n", disable,
deactivated);
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static int test_write_limit(void)
TPM_CHECK(TlclStartupIfNeeded());
TPM_CHECK(tpm_self_test_full());
TPM_CHECK(tpm_tsc_physical_presence(PRESENCE));
- TPM_CHECK(tpm_force_clear());
+ TPM_CHECK(tpm_force_clear(0, NULL, 0));
TPM_CHECK(tpm_physical_enable());
TPM_CHECK(tpm_physical_set_deactivated(0));
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int test_write_limit(void)
}
/* Reset write count */
- TPM_CHECK(tpm_force_clear());
+ TPM_CHECK(tpm_force_clear(0, NULL, 0));
TPM_CHECK(tpm_physical_enable());
TPM_CHECK(tpm_physical_set_deactivated(0));
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index 38d7cb899d..2f17166662 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -43,13 +43,23 @@ enum tpm_startup_type {
};
enum tpm2_startup_types {
- TPM2_SU_CLEAR = 0x0000,
- TPM2_SU_STATE = 0x0001,
+ TPM2_SU_CLEAR = 0x0000,
+ TPM2_SU_STATE = 0x0001,
+};
+
+enum tpm2_handles {
+ TPM2_RH_OWNER = 0x40000001,
+ TPM2_RS_PW = 0x40000009,
+ TPM2_RH_LOCKOUT = 0x4000000A,
+ TPM2_RH_ENDORSEMENT = 0x4000000B,
+ TPM2_RH_PLATFORM = 0x4000000C,
};
enum tpm2_command_codes {
TPM2_CC_STARTUP = 0x0144,
TPM2_CC_SELF_TEST = 0x0143,
+ TPM2_CC_CLEAR = 0x0126,
+ TPM2_CC_CLEARCONTROL = 0x0127,
TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY = 0x017A,
TPM2_CC_PCR_READ = 0x017E,
TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND = 0x0182,
@@ -567,11 +577,14 @@ uint32_t tpm_tsc_physical_presence(uint16_t presence);
uint32_t tpm_read_pubek(void *data, size_t count);
/**
- * Issue a TPM_ForceClear command.
+ * Issue a TPM_ForceClear or a TPM2_Clear command.
*
+ * @param handle Handle
+ * @param pw Password
+ * @param pw_sz Length of the password
* @return return code of the operation
*/
-uint32_t tpm_force_clear(void);
+int tpm_force_clear(u32 handle, const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz);
/**
* Issue a TPM_PhysicalEnable command.
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index 7b379b99aa..e5fb18308c 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -608,13 +608,47 @@ uint32_t tpm_read_pubek(void *data, size_t count)
return 0;
}
-uint32_t tpm_force_clear(void)
+int tpm_force_clear(u32 handle, const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz)
{
- const uint8_t command[10] = {
- 0x0, 0xc1, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xa, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x5d,
+ const u8 command_v1[10] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(0xc1),
+ STRINGIFY32(10),
+ STRINGIFY32(0x5d),
};
+ u8 command_v2[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_SESSIONS), /* TAG */
+ STRINGIFY32(27 + pw_sz), /* Command size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_CLEAR), /* Command code */
- return tpm_sendrecv_command(command, NULL, NULL);
+ /* HANDLE */
+ STRINGIFY32(handle), /* TPM resource handle */
+
+ /* AUTH_SESSION */
+ STRINGIFY32(9 + pw_sz), /* Authorization size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_RS_PW), /* Session handle */
+ STRINGIFY16(0), /* Size of <nonce> */
+ /* <nonce> (if any) */
+ 0, /* Attributes: Cont/Excl/Rst */
+ STRINGIFY16(pw_sz), /* Size of <hmac/password> */
+ /* STRING(pw) <hmac/password> (if any) */
+ };
+ unsigned int offset = 27;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v1, NULL, NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * Fill the command structure starting from the first buffer:
+ * - the password (if any)
+ */
+ ret = pack_byte_string(command_v2, sizeof(command_v2), "s",
+ offset, pw, pw_sz);
+ offset += pw_sz;
+ if (ret)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ return tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, NULL, NULL);
}
uint32_t tpm_physical_enable(void)
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/18] tpm: rename the _extend() function to be _pcr_event()
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/18] tpm: add TPM2_Clear " Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/18] tpm: add TPM2_PCR_Extend command support Miquel Raynal
` (6 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
The function currently called _extend() actually does what the
specification defines as a _pcr_event(). Rename the function
accordingly before implementing the actual _extend() command.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
cmd/tpm_test.c | 4 ++--
include/tpm.h | 4 ++--
lib/tpm.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index 32921e1a70..93dcd1a65c 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -324,8 +324,8 @@ static int do_tpm_nv_write_value(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
return report_return_code(rc);
}
-static int do_tpm_extend(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
- int argc, char * const argv[])
+static int do_tpm_pcr_event(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
+ int argc, char * const argv[])
{
uint8_t in_digest[TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH];
uint8_t out_digest[TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH];
@@ -333,13 +333,14 @@ static int do_tpm_extend(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
if (argc != 3)
return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
index = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
if (!parse_byte_string(argv[2], in_digest, NULL)) {
printf("Couldn't parse byte string %s\n", argv[2]);
return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
}
- rc = tpm_extend(index, in_digest, out_digest);
+ rc = tpm_pcr_event(index, in_digest, out_digest);
if (!rc) {
puts("PCR value after execution of the command:\n");
print_byte_string(out_digest, TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH);
@@ -887,8 +888,8 @@ static cmd_tbl_t tpm_commands[] = {
do_tpm_nv_read_value, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(nv_write_value, 0, 1,
do_tpm_nv_write_value, "", ""),
- U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(extend, 0, 1,
- do_tpm_extend, "", ""),
+ U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_event, 0, 1,
+ do_tpm_pcr_event, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_read, 0, 1,
do_tpm_pcr_read, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(tsc_physical_presence, 0, 1,
@@ -1019,9 +1020,10 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_tpm,
" - Read <count> bytes of the public endorsement key to memory\n"
" address <addr>\n"
"Integrity Collection and Reporting Commands:\n"
-" extend index digest_hex_string\n"
-" - Add a new measurement to a PCR. Update PCR <index> with the 20-bytes\n"
-" <digest_hex_string>\n"
+" pcr_event <index> <digest_in> <digest_out>\n"
+" - Add a new measurement to a PCR. Update PCR <index> with\n"
+" <digest_in>. It must be a 20 byte digest for TPMv1 or a SHA256\n"
+" digest of 32 bytes for TPMv2. Value of the PCR is given at <digest_out>\n"
" pcr_read index addr count\n"
" - Read <count> bytes from PCR <index> to memory address <addr>.\n"
#ifdef CONFIG_TPM_AUTH_SESSIONS
diff --git a/cmd/tpm_test.c b/cmd/tpm_test.c
index da40dbc423..0bbbdab4ee 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm_test.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm_test.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int test_early_extend(void)
tpm_init();
TPM_CHECK(tpm_startup(TPM_ST_CLEAR));
TPM_CHECK(tpm_continue_self_test());
- TPM_CHECK(tpm_extend(1, value_in, value_out));
+ TPM_CHECK(tpm_pcr_event(1, value_in, value_out));
printf("done\n");
return 0;
}
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static int test_timing(void)
TTPM_CHECK(tpm_tsc_physical_presence(PRESENCE), 100);
TTPM_CHECK(tpm_nv_write_value(INDEX0, (uint8_t *)&x, sizeof(x)), 100);
TTPM_CHECK(tpm_nv_read_value(INDEX0, (uint8_t *)&x, sizeof(x)), 100);
- TTPM_CHECK(tpm_extend(0, in, out), 200);
+ TTPM_CHECK(tpm_pcr_event(0, in, out), 200);
TTPM_CHECK(tpm_set_global_lock(), 50);
TTPM_CHECK(tpm_tsc_physical_presence(PHYS_PRESENCE), 100);
printf("done\n");
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index 2f17166662..a863ac6196 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ uint32_t tpm_nv_read_value(uint32_t index, void *data, uint32_t count);
uint32_t tpm_nv_write_value(uint32_t index, const void *data, uint32_t length);
/**
- * Issue a TPM_Extend command.
+ * Issue a TPM_PCR_Event command.
*
* @param index index of the PCR
* @param in_digest 160-bit value representing the event to be
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ uint32_t tpm_nv_write_value(uint32_t index, const void *data, uint32_t length);
* command
* @return return code of the operation
*/
-uint32_t tpm_extend(uint32_t index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest);
+int tpm_pcr_event(u32 index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest);
/**
* Issue a TPM_PCRRead command.
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index e5fb18308c..07e2490af2 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ uint32_t tpm_nv_write_value(uint32_t index, const void *data, uint32_t length)
return 0;
}
-uint32_t tpm_extend(uint32_t index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest)
+int tpm_pcr_event(u32 index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest)
{
const uint8_t command[34] = {
0x0, 0xc1, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x22, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x14,
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/18] tpm: add TPM2_PCR_Extend command support
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/18] tpm: rename the _extend() function to be _pcr_event() Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/18] tpm: add TPM2_PCR_Read " Miquel Raynal
` (5 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add support for the TPM2_PCR_Extend command.
Change the command file and the help accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
include/tpm.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
lib/tpm.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index 93dcd1a65c..3f284f0adf 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -349,6 +349,18 @@ static int do_tpm_pcr_event(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
return report_return_code(rc);
}
+static int do_tpm_pcr_extend(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
+ int argc, char * const argv[])
+{
+ u32 index = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
+ void *digest = (void *)simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 0);
+
+ if (argc != 3)
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ return report_return_code(tpm2_pcr_extend(index, digest));
+}
+
static int do_tpm_pcr_read(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
int argc, char * const argv[])
{
@@ -890,6 +902,8 @@ static cmd_tbl_t tpm_commands[] = {
do_tpm_nv_write_value, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_event, 0, 1,
do_tpm_pcr_event, "", ""),
+ U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_extend, 0, 1,
+ do_tpm_pcr_extend, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_read, 0, 1,
do_tpm_pcr_read, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(tsc_physical_presence, 0, 1,
@@ -1026,6 +1040,10 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_tpm,
" digest of 32 bytes for TPMv2. Value of the PCR is given at <digest_out>\n"
" pcr_read index addr count\n"
" - Read <count> bytes from PCR <index> to memory address <addr>.\n"
+" pcr_extend index <digest_in>\n"
+" - Add a new measurement to a PCR. Update PCR <index> with\n"
+" <digest_in>. It must be a 20 byte digest for TPMv1 or a SHA256\n"
+" digest of 32 bytes for TPMv2.\n"
#ifdef CONFIG_TPM_AUTH_SESSIONS
"Authorization Sessions\n"
" oiap\n"
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index a863ac6196..b88ad4b2f4 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -76,6 +76,14 @@ enum tpm2_return_codes {
TPM2_RC_LOCKOUT = 0x0921,
};
+enum tpm_algorithms {
+ TPM2_ALG_XOR = 0x0A,
+ TPM2_ALG_SHA256 = 0x0B,
+ TPM2_ALG_SHA384 = 0x0C,
+ TPM2_ALG_SHA512 = 0x0D,
+ TPM2_ALG_NULL = 0x10,
+};
+
enum tpm_physical_presence {
TPM_PHYSICAL_PRESENCE_HW_DISABLE = 0x0200,
TPM_PHYSICAL_PRESENCE_CMD_DISABLE = 0x0100,
@@ -548,6 +556,16 @@ uint32_t tpm_nv_write_value(uint32_t index, const void *data, uint32_t length);
*/
int tpm_pcr_event(u32 index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest);
+/**
+ * Issue a TPM_PCR_Extend command.
+ *
+ * @param index Index of the PCR
+ * @param digest Value representing the event to be recorded
+ *
+ * @return return code of the operation
+ */
+int tpm2_pcr_extend(u32 index, const uint8_t *digest);
+
/**
* Issue a TPM_PCRRead command.
*
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index 07e2490af2..e74530d538 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -527,6 +527,47 @@ int tpm_pcr_event(u32 index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest)
return 0;
}
+int tpm2_pcr_extend(u32 index, const uint8_t *digest)
+{
+ u8 command_v2[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_SESSIONS), /* TAG */
+ STRINGIFY32(33 + TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH), /* Command size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND), /* Command code */
+
+ /* HANDLE */
+ STRINGIFY32(index), /* Handle (PCR Index) */
+
+ /* AUTH_SESSION */
+ STRINGIFY32(9), /* Authorization size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_RS_PW), /* Session handle */
+ STRINGIFY16(0), /* Size of <nonce> */
+ /* <nonce> (if any) */
+ 0, /* Attributes: Cont/Excl/Rst */
+ STRINGIFY16(0), /* Size of <hmac/password> */
+ /* <hmac/password> (if any) */
+ STRINGIFY32(1), /* Count (number of hashes) */
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ALG_SHA256), /* Algorithm of the hash */
+ /* STRING(digest) Digest */
+ };
+ unsigned int offset = 33;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ /*
+ * Fill the command structure starting from the first buffer:
+ * - the digest
+ */
+ ret = pack_byte_string(command_v2, sizeof(command_v2), "s",
+ offset, digest, TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH);
+ offset += TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH;
+ if (ret)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ return tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
uint32_t tpm_pcr_read(uint32_t index, void *data, size_t count)
{
const uint8_t command[14] = {
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/18] tpm: add TPM2_PCR_Read command support
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/18] tpm: add TPM2_PCR_Extend command support Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/18] tpm: add TPM2_GetCapability " Miquel Raynal
` (4 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add support for the TPM2_PCR_Read command.
Change the command file and the help accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
include/tpm.h | 4 ++--
lib/tpm.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index 3f284f0adf..8630571b1a 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -362,21 +362,25 @@ static int do_tpm_pcr_extend(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
}
static int do_tpm_pcr_read(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
- int argc, char * const argv[])
+ int argc, char * const argv[])
{
- uint32_t index, count, rc;
+ bool is_tpmv2 = (tpm_get_specification() == 2);
+ u32 index, rc;
+ unsigned int updates;
void *data;
- if (argc != 4)
+ if (argc != 3)
return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
index = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
data = (void *)simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 0);
- count = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 0);
- rc = tpm_pcr_read(index, data, count);
+ rc = tpm_pcr_read(index, data, &updates);
if (!rc) {
- puts("Named PCR content:\n");
- print_byte_string(data, count);
+ printf("Named PCR %u content (known updates: %d):\n", index,
+ is_tpmv2 ? updates : -1);
+ print_byte_string(data, !is_tpmv2 ? TPM1_DIGEST_LENGTH :
+ TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH);
}
return report_return_code(rc);
@@ -1038,12 +1042,13 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_tpm,
" - Add a new measurement to a PCR. Update PCR <index> with\n"
" <digest_in>. It must be a 20 byte digest for TPMv1 or a SHA256\n"
" digest of 32 bytes for TPMv2. Value of the PCR is given at <digest_out>\n"
-" pcr_read index addr count\n"
-" - Read <count> bytes from PCR <index> to memory address <addr>.\n"
" pcr_extend index <digest_in>\n"
" - Add a new measurement to a PCR. Update PCR <index> with\n"
" <digest_in>. It must be a 20 byte digest for TPMv1 or a SHA256\n"
" digest of 32 bytes for TPMv2.\n"
+" pcr_read <index> <digest_in>\n"
+" - Read PCR <index> to memory address <digest_in> (20B with TPMv1, 64B with\n"
+" TPMv2).\n"
#ifdef CONFIG_TPM_AUTH_SESSIONS
"Authorization Sessions\n"
" oiap\n"
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index b88ad4b2f4..2df2ea3c5b 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -571,10 +571,10 @@ int tpm2_pcr_extend(u32 index, const uint8_t *digest);
*
* @param index index of the PCR
* @param data output buffer for contents of the named PCR
- * @param count size of output buffer
+ * @param updates optional out parameter: number of updates for this PCR
* @return return code of the operation
*/
-uint32_t tpm_pcr_read(uint32_t index, void *data, size_t count);
+int tpm_pcr_read(u32 index, void *data, unsigned int *updates);
/**
* Issue a TSC_PhysicalPresence command. TPM physical presence flag
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index e74530d538..925b21e2d6 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ int tpm2_pcr_extend(u32 index, const uint8_t *digest)
return tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, NULL, NULL);
}
-uint32_t tpm_pcr_read(uint32_t index, void *data, size_t count)
+int tpm1_pcr_read(u32 index, void *data)
{
const uint8_t command[14] = {
0x0, 0xc1, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xe, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x15,
@@ -596,6 +596,60 @@ uint32_t tpm_pcr_read(uint32_t index, void *data, size_t count)
return 0;
}
+int tpm2_pcr_read(u32 index, void *data, unsigned int *updates)
+{
+ u8 command_v2[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS), /* TAG */
+ STRINGIFY32(20), /* Command size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_PCR_READ), /* Command code */
+
+ /* TPML_PCR_SELECTION */
+ STRINGIFY32(1), /* Number of selections */
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ALG_SHA256), /* Algorithm of the hash */
+ 3, /* Array size for selection */
+ /* STRINGIFY32(bitmap(index) << 8) Selected PCR bitmap */
+ };
+ size_t response_len = COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE;
+ u8 response[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE];
+ unsigned int counter = 0;
+ u8 pcr_sel[3] = {};
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ if (index >= 24)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ pcr_sel[index / 8] = BIT(index % 8);
+ if (pack_byte_string(command_v2, COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE, "bbb",
+ 17, pcr_sel[0], 18, pcr_sel[1], 19, pcr_sel[2]))
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ ret = tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, response, &response_len);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (unpack_byte_string(response, response_len, "ds",
+ 10, &counter,
+ response_len - TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH, data,
+ TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH))
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ if (updates)
+ *updates = counter;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int tpm_pcr_read(u32 index, void *data, unsigned int *updates)
+{
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ return tpm1_pcr_read(index, data);
+ else
+ return tpm2_pcr_read(index, data, updates);
+}
+
uint32_t tpm_tsc_physical_presence(uint16_t presence)
{
const uint8_t command[12] = {
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/18] tpm: add TPM2_GetCapability command support
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/18] tpm: add TPM2_PCR_Read " Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/18] tpm: add dictionary attack mitigation commands support Miquel Raynal
` (3 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add support for the TPM2_GetCapability command.
Change the command file and the help accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/tpm.h | 14 +++++++-------
lib/tpm.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index 8630571b1a..7fcfbf8550 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -433,21 +433,30 @@ static int do_tpm_physical_set_deactivated(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
static int do_tpm_get_capability(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
int argc, char * const argv[])
{
- uint32_t cap_area, sub_cap, rc;
- void *cap;
+ u32 capability, property, rc;
+ u8 *data;
size_t count;
+ int i, j;
if (argc != 5)
return CMD_RET_USAGE;
- cap_area = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
- sub_cap = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 0);
- cap = (void *)simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 0);
+ capability = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
+ property = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 0);
+ data = (void *)simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 0);
count = simple_strtoul(argv[4], NULL, 0);
- rc = tpm_get_capability(cap_area, sub_cap, cap, count);
+ rc = tpm_get_capability(capability, property, data, count);
if (!rc) {
- puts("capability information:\n");
- print_byte_string(cap, count);
+ printf("Capabilities read from TPM:\n");
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+ printf("Property 0x");
+ for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ printf("%02x", data[(i * 8) + j]);
+ printf(": 0x");
+ for (j = 4; j < 8; j++)
+ printf("%02x", data[(i * 8) + j]);
+ printf("\n");
+ }
}
return report_return_code(rc);
@@ -998,9 +1007,9 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_tpm,
" tsc_physical_presence flags\n"
" - Set TPM device's Physical Presence flags to <flags>.\n"
"The Capability Commands:\n"
-" get_capability cap_area sub_cap addr count\n"
-" - Read <count> bytes of TPM capability indexed by <cap_area> and\n"
-" <sub_cap> to memory address <addr>.\n"
+" get_capability <cap_area|capability> <sub_cap|property> <addr> <count>\n"
+" - Read <count> bytes of TPM capability indexed by <cap_area|capability>\n"
+" and <sub_cap|property> to memory address <addr>.\n"
#if defined(CONFIG_TPM_FLUSH_RESOURCES) || defined(CONFIG_TPM_LIST_RESOURCES)
"Resource management functions\n"
#endif
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index 2df2ea3c5b..369119fc1b 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -628,17 +628,17 @@ uint32_t tpm_physical_set_deactivated(uint8_t state);
/**
* Issue a TPM_GetCapability command. This implementation is limited
- * to query sub_cap index that is 4-byte wide.
+ * to query property index that is 4-byte wide.
*
- * @param cap_area partition of capabilities
- * @param sub_cap further definition of capability, which is
+ * @param capability partition of capabilities
+ * @param property further definition of capability, which is
* limited to be 4-byte wide
- * @param cap output buffer for capability information
- * @param count size of ouput buffer
+ * @param buf output buffer for capability information
+ * @param propertycount size of output buffer
* @return return code of the operation
*/
-uint32_t tpm_get_capability(uint32_t cap_area, uint32_t sub_cap,
- void *cap, size_t count);
+int tpm_get_capability(u32 capability, u32 property, void *buf,
+ size_t property_count);
/**
* Issue a TPM_FlushSpecific command for a AUTH ressource.
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index 925b21e2d6..59f6cd6dba 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -789,8 +789,7 @@ uint32_t tpm_physical_set_deactivated(uint8_t state)
return tpm_sendrecv_command(buf, NULL, NULL);
}
-uint32_t tpm_get_capability(uint32_t cap_area, uint32_t sub_cap,
- void *cap, size_t count)
+int tpm1_get_capability(u32 cap_area, u32 sub_cap, void *cap, size_t count)
{
const uint8_t command[22] = {
0x0, 0xc1, /* TPM_TAG */
@@ -829,6 +828,42 @@ uint32_t tpm_get_capability(uint32_t cap_area, uint32_t sub_cap,
return 0;
}
+int tpm2_get_capability(u32 capability, u32 property, void *buf,
+ size_t property_count)
+{
+ u8 command_v2[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS), /* TAG */
+ STRINGIFY32(22), /* Command size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY), /* Command code */
+
+ STRINGIFY32(capability), /* Capability */
+ STRINGIFY32(property), /* Property */
+ STRINGIFY32(property_count), /* Property count */
+ };
+ u8 response[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE];
+ size_t response_len = COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, response, &response_len);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ memcpy(buf, &response[19], response_len - 19);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int tpm_get_capability(u32 capability, u32 property, void *buf,
+ size_t property_count)
+{
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ return tpm1_get_capability(capability, property, buf,
+ property_count);
+ else
+ return tpm2_get_capability(capability, property, buf,
+ property_count);
+}
+
uint32_t tpm_get_permanent_flags(struct tpm_permanent_flags *pflags)
{
const uint8_t command[22] = {
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/18] tpm: add dictionary attack mitigation commands support
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/18] tpm: add TPM2_GetCapability " Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 17/18] tpm: add TPM2_HierarchyChangeAuth command support Miquel Raynal
` (2 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add support for the TPM2_DictionaryAttackParameters and
TPM2_DictionaryAttackLockReset commands.
Change the command file and the help accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/tpm.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++
lib/tpm.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 184 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index 7fcfbf8550..533da2d2ac 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -480,6 +480,58 @@ static int do_tpm_init(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
return report_return_code(tpm_init());
}
+static int do_tpm_dam_reset_counter(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
+ int argc, char *const argv[])
+{
+ const char *pw = (argc < 2) ? NULL : argv[1];
+ const ssize_t pw_sz = pw ? strlen(pw) : 0;
+
+ if (argc > 2)
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ if (pw_sz > TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return report_return_code(tpm2_dam_reset_counter(pw, pw_sz));
+}
+
+static int do_tpm_dam_set_parameters(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
+ int argc, char *const argv[])
+{
+ const char *pw = (argc < 5) ? NULL : argv[4];
+ const ssize_t pw_sz = pw ? strlen(pw) : 0;
+ /*
+ * No Dictionary Attack Mitigation (DAM) means:
+ * maxtries = 0xFFFFFFFF, recovery_time = 0, lockout_recovery = 1
+ */
+ unsigned long int max_tries;
+ unsigned long int recovery_time;
+ unsigned long int lockout_recovery;
+
+ if (argc < 4 || argc > 5)
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ if (pw_sz > TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (strict_strtoul(argv[1], 0, &max_tries))
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ if (strict_strtoul(argv[2], 0, &recovery_time))
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ if (strict_strtoul(argv[3], 0, &lockout_recovery))
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ debug("Changing dictionary attack parameters:\n");
+ debug("- maxTries: %lu\n- recoveryTime: %lu\n- lockoutRecovery: %lu\n",
+ max_tries, recovery_time, lockout_recovery);
+
+ return report_return_code(tpm2_dam_set_parameters(pw, pw_sz, max_tries,
+ recovery_time,
+ lockout_recovery));
+}
+
static int do_tpm_force_clear(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
int argc, char * const argv[])
{
@@ -901,6 +953,10 @@ static cmd_tbl_t tpm_commands[] = {
do_tpm_self_test_full, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(continue_self_test, 0, 1,
do_tpm_continue_self_test, "", ""),
+ U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(dam_reset_counter, 0, 1,
+ do_tpm_dam_reset_counter, "", ""),
+ U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(dam_set_parameters, 0, 1,
+ do_tpm_dam_set_parameters, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(force_clear, 0, 1,
do_tpm_force_clear, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(physical_enable, 0, 1,
@@ -1010,6 +1066,19 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_tpm,
" get_capability <cap_area|capability> <sub_cap|property> <addr> <count>\n"
" - Read <count> bytes of TPM capability indexed by <cap_area|capability>\n"
" and <sub_cap|property> to memory address <addr>.\n"
+"Lockout/Dictionary attack Commands:\n"
+" dam_reset_counter [<password>]\n"
+" - If the TPM is not in a LOCKOUT state, reset the internal error\n"
+" counter (TPMv2 only)\n"
+" dam_set_parameters <maxTries> <recoveryTime> <lockoutRecovery> [<password>]\n"
+" - If the TPM is not in a LOCKOUT state, set the dictionary attack\n"
+" parameters:\n"
+" * maxTries: maximum number of failures before lockout.\n"
+" 0 means always locking.\n"
+" * recoveryTime: time before decrementation of the error counter,\n"
+" 0 means no lockout.\n"
+" * lockoutRecovery: time of a lockout (before the next try)\n"
+" 0 means a reboot is needed.\n"
#if defined(CONFIG_TPM_FLUSH_RESOURCES) || defined(CONFIG_TPM_LIST_RESOURCES)
"Resource management functions\n"
#endif
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index 369119fc1b..4d062584f9 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes {
TPM2_CC_SELF_TEST = 0x0143,
TPM2_CC_CLEAR = 0x0126,
TPM2_CC_CLEARCONTROL = 0x0127,
+ TPM2_CC_DAM_RESET = 0x0139,
+ TPM2_CC_DAM_PARAMETERS = 0x013A,
TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY = 0x017A,
TPM2_CC_PCR_READ = 0x017E,
TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND = 0x0182,
@@ -594,6 +596,30 @@ uint32_t tpm_tsc_physical_presence(uint16_t presence);
*/
uint32_t tpm_read_pubek(void *data, size_t count);
+/**
+ * Issue a TPM2_DictionaryAttackLockReset command.
+ *
+ * @param pw Password
+ * @param pw_sz Length of the password
+ * @return return code of the operation
+ */
+int tpm2_dam_reset_counter(const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz);
+
+/**
+ * Issue a TPM2_DictionaryAttackLockParameters command.
+ *
+ * @param pw Password
+ * @param pw_sz Length of the password
+ * @param max_tries Count of authorizations before lockout
+ * @param recovery_time Time before decrementation of the failure count
+ * @param lockout_recovery Time to wait after a lockout
+ * @return return code of the operation
+ */
+int tpm2_dam_set_parameters(const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz,
+ unsigned int max_tries,
+ unsigned int recovery_time,
+ unsigned int lockout_recovery);
+
/**
* Issue a TPM_ForceClear or a TPM2_Clear command.
*
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index 59f6cd6dba..1e064e6ff1 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -703,6 +703,95 @@ uint32_t tpm_read_pubek(void *data, size_t count)
return 0;
}
+int tpm2_dam_reset_counter(const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz)
+{
+ u8 command_v2[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_SESSIONS), /* TAG */
+ STRINGIFY32(27 + pw_sz), /* Command size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_DAM_RESET), /* Command code */
+
+ /* HANDLE */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_RH_LOCKOUT), /* TPM resource handle */
+
+ /* AUTH_SESSION */
+ STRINGIFY32(9 + pw_sz), /* Authorization size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_RS_PW), /* Session handle */
+ STRINGIFY16(0), /* Size of <nonce> */
+ /* <nonce> (if any) */
+ 0, /* Attributes: Cont/Excl/Rst */
+ STRINGIFY16(pw_sz), /* Size of <hmac/password> */
+ /* STRING(pw) <hmac/password> (if any) */
+ };
+ unsigned int offset = 27;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ /*
+ * Fill the command structure starting from the first buffer:
+ * - the password (if any)
+ */
+ ret = pack_byte_string(command_v2, sizeof(command_v2), "s",
+ offset, pw, pw_sz);
+ offset += pw_sz;
+ if (ret)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ return tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+int tpm2_dam_set_parameters(const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz,
+ unsigned int max_tries, unsigned int recovery_time,
+ unsigned int lockout_recovery)
+{
+ u8 command_v2[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_SESSIONS), /* TAG */
+ STRINGIFY32(27 + pw_sz + 12), /* Command size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_DAM_PARAMETERS), /* Command code */
+
+ /* HANDLE */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_RH_LOCKOUT), /* TPM resource handle */
+
+ /* AUTH_SESSION */
+ STRINGIFY32(9 + pw_sz), /* Authorization size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_RS_PW), /* Session handle */
+ STRINGIFY16(0), /* Size of <nonce> */
+ /* <nonce> (if any) */
+ 0, /* Attributes: Cont/Excl/Rst */
+ STRINGIFY16(pw_sz), /* Size of <hmac/password> */
+ /* STRING(pw) <hmac/password> (if any) */
+
+ /* LOCKOUT PARAMETERS */
+ /* STRIGIFY32(max_tries) Max tries (0, always lock) */
+ /* STRIGIFY32(recovery_time) Recovery time (0, no lock) */
+ /* STRIGIFY32(lockout_recovery) Lockout recovery */
+ };
+ unsigned int offset = 27;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ /*
+ * Fill the command structure starting from the first buffer:
+ * - the password (if any)
+ * - max tries
+ * - recovery time
+ * - lockout recovery
+ */
+ ret = pack_byte_string(command_v2, sizeof(command_v2), "sddd",
+ offset, pw, pw_sz,
+ offset + pw_sz, max_tries,
+ offset + pw_sz + 4, recovery_time,
+ offset + pw_sz + 8, lockout_recovery);
+ offset += pw_sz + 12;
+ if (ret)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ return tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
int tpm_force_clear(u32 handle, const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz)
{
const u8 command_v1[10] = {
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 17/18] tpm: add TPM2_HierarchyChangeAuth command support
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/18] tpm: add dictionary attack mitigation commands support Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] tpm: add PCR authentication commands support Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 17:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Tom Rini
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add support for the TPM2_HierarchyChangeAuth command.
Change the command file and the help accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/tpm.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
lib/tpm.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index 533da2d2ac..3c486c313b 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -555,6 +555,36 @@ static int do_tpm_force_clear(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
return report_return_code(tpm_force_clear(handle, pw, pw_sz));
}
+static int do_tpm_change_auth(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
+ int argc, char *const argv[])
+{
+ u32 handle;
+ const char *newpw = argv[2];
+ const char *oldpw = (argc == 3) ? NULL : argv[3];
+ const ssize_t newpw_sz = strlen(newpw);
+ const ssize_t oldpw_sz = oldpw ? strlen(oldpw) : 0;
+
+ if (argc < 3 || argc > 4)
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ if (newpw_sz > TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH || oldpw_sz > TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!strcasecmp("TPM2_RH_LOCKOUT", argv[1]))
+ handle = TPM2_RH_LOCKOUT;
+ else if (!strcasecmp("TPM2_RH_ENDORSEMENT", argv[1]))
+ handle = TPM2_RH_ENDORSEMENT;
+ else if (!strcasecmp("TPM2_RH_OWNER", argv[1]))
+ handle = TPM2_RH_OWNER;
+ else if (!strcasecmp("TPM2_RH_PLATFORM", argv[1]))
+ handle = TPM2_RH_PLATFORM;
+ else
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ return report_return_code(tpm2_change_auth(handle, newpw, newpw_sz,
+ oldpw, oldpw_sz));
+}
+
#define TPM_COMMAND_NO_ARG(cmd) \
static int do_##cmd(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, \
int argc, char * const argv[]) \
@@ -959,6 +989,8 @@ static cmd_tbl_t tpm_commands[] = {
do_tpm_dam_set_parameters, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(force_clear, 0, 1,
do_tpm_force_clear, "", ""),
+ U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(change_auth, 0, 1,
+ do_tpm_change_auth, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(physical_enable, 0, 1,
do_tpm_physical_enable, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(physical_disable, 0, 1,
@@ -1060,6 +1092,8 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_tpm,
" force_clear [<type>]\n"
" - Issue TPM_[Force]Clear command, with <type> one of (TPMv2 only):\n"
" * TPM2_RH_LOCKOUT, TPM2_RH_PLATFORM.\n"
+" change_auth <new_pw> [<old_pw>]\n"
+" - Change the hierarchy authorizations (TPMv2 only).\n"
" tsc_physical_presence flags\n"
" - Set TPM device's Physical Presence flags to <flags>.\n"
"The Capability Commands:\n"
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index 4d062584f9..cc63f06634 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes {
TPM2_CC_SELF_TEST = 0x0143,
TPM2_CC_CLEAR = 0x0126,
TPM2_CC_CLEARCONTROL = 0x0127,
+ TPM2_CC_HIERCHANGEAUTH = 0x0129,
TPM2_CC_DAM_RESET = 0x0139,
TPM2_CC_DAM_PARAMETERS = 0x013A,
TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY = 0x017A,
@@ -630,6 +631,19 @@ int tpm2_dam_set_parameters(const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz,
*/
int tpm_force_clear(u32 handle, const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz);
+/**
+ * Issue a TPM2_HierarchyChangeAuthorization command.
+ *
+ * @param handle Handle
+ * @param newpw New password
+ * @param newpw_sz Length of the new password
+ * @param oldpw Old password
+ * @param oldpw_sz Length of the old password
+ * @return return code of the operation
+ */
+int tpm2_change_auth(u32 handle, const char *newpw, const ssize_t newpw_sz,
+ const char *oldpw, const ssize_t oldpw_sz);
+
/**
* Issue a TPM_PhysicalEnable command.
*
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index 1e064e6ff1..f09b9ce9eb 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -835,6 +835,53 @@ int tpm_force_clear(u32 handle, const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz)
return tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, NULL, NULL);
}
+int tpm2_change_auth(u32 handle, const char *newpw, const ssize_t newpw_sz,
+ const char *oldpw, const ssize_t oldpw_sz)
+{
+ unsigned int offset = 27;
+ u8 command_v2[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_SESSIONS), /* TAG */
+ STRINGIFY32(offset + oldpw_sz + 2 + newpw_sz), /* Command len */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_HIERCHANGEAUTH), /* Command code */
+
+ /* HANDLE */
+ STRINGIFY32(handle), /* TPM resource handle */
+
+ /* AUTH_SESSION */
+ STRINGIFY32(9 + oldpw_sz), /* Authorization size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_RS_PW), /* Session handle */
+ STRINGIFY16(0), /* Size of <nonce> */
+ /* <nonce> (if any) */
+ 0, /* Attributes: Cont/Excl/Rst */
+ STRINGIFY16(oldpw_sz) /* Size of <hmac/password> */
+ /* STRING(oldpw) <hmac/password> (if any) */
+
+ /* TPM2B_AUTH (TPM2B_DIGEST) */
+ /* STRINGIFY16(newpw_sz) Digest size, new pw length */
+ /* STRING(newpw) Digest buffer, new pw */
+ };
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ /*
+ * Fill the command structure starting from the first buffer:
+ * - the old password (if any)
+ * - size of the new password
+ * - new password
+ */
+ ret = pack_byte_string(command_v2, sizeof(command_v2), "sws",
+ offset, oldpw, oldpw_sz,
+ offset + oldpw_sz, newpw_sz,
+ offset + oldpw_sz + 2, newpw, newpw_sz);
+ offset += oldpw_sz + 2 + newpw_sz;
+ if (ret)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ return tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
uint32_t tpm_physical_enable(void)
{
const uint8_t command[10] = {
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] tpm: add PCR authentication commands support
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 17/18] tpm: add TPM2_HierarchyChangeAuth command support Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 15:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-08 17:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Tom Rini
18 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add support for the TPM2_PCR_SetAuthPolicy and
TPM2_PCR_SetAuthValue commands.
Change the command file and the help accordingly.
Note: These commands could not be tested because the TPMs available
do not support them, however they could be useful for someone else.
The user is warned by the command help.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
cmd/tpm.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/tpm.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++
lib/tpm.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 184 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cmd/tpm.c b/cmd/tpm.c
index 3c486c313b..c97babea84 100644
--- a/cmd/tpm.c
+++ b/cmd/tpm.c
@@ -349,6 +349,43 @@ static int do_tpm_pcr_event(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
return report_return_code(rc);
}
+static int do_tpm_pcr_setauthpolicy(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
+ int argc, char * const argv[])
+{
+ u32 index = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
+ char *key = argv[2];
+ const char *pw = (argc < 4) ? NULL : argv[3];
+ const ssize_t pw_sz = pw ? strlen(pw) : 0;
+
+ if (strlen(key) != TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (argc < 3 || argc > 4)
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ return report_return_code(tpm2_pcr_setauthpolicy(pw, pw_sz, index,
+ key));
+}
+
+static int do_tpm_pcr_setauthvalue(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
+ int argc, char * const argv[])
+{
+ u32 index = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
+ char *key = argv[2];
+ const ssize_t key_sz = strlen(key);
+ const char *pw = (argc < 4) ? NULL : argv[3];
+ const ssize_t pw_sz = pw ? strlen(pw) : 0;
+
+ if (strlen(key) != TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (argc < 3 || argc > 4)
+ return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+ return report_return_code(tpm2_pcr_setauthvalue(pw, pw_sz, index,
+ key, key_sz));
+}
+
static int do_tpm_pcr_extend(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
int argc, char * const argv[])
{
@@ -1003,6 +1040,10 @@ static cmd_tbl_t tpm_commands[] = {
do_tpm_nv_write_value, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_event, 0, 1,
do_tpm_pcr_event, "", ""),
+ U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_setauthpolicy, 0, 1,
+ do_tpm_pcr_setauthpolicy, "", ""),
+ U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_setauthvalue, 0, 1,
+ do_tpm_pcr_setauthvalue, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_extend, 0, 1,
do_tpm_pcr_extend, "", ""),
U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pcr_read, 0, 1,
@@ -1150,6 +1191,14 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(tpm, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_tpm,
" - Read <count> bytes of the public endorsement key to memory\n"
" address <addr>\n"
"Integrity Collection and Reporting Commands:\n"
+" pcr_setauthpolicy <index> <key> <pw>\n"
+" - Change the <key> to access <index> PCR. <pw> is for the platform\n"
+" hierarchy and may be empty.\n"
+" /!\\WARNING: untested function, use at your own risks !\n"
+" pcr_setauthvalue <index> <key> <pw>\n"
+" - Change the <key> to access <index> PCR. <pw> is for the platform\n"
+" hierarchy and may be empty.\n"
+" /!\\WARNING: untested function, use at your own risks !\n"
" pcr_event <index> <digest_in> <digest_out>\n"
" - Add a new measurement to a PCR. Update PCR <index> with\n"
" <digest_in>. It must be a 20 byte digest for TPMv1 or a SHA256\n"
diff --git a/include/tpm.h b/include/tpm.h
index cc63f06634..93ec521e74 100644
--- a/include/tpm.h
+++ b/include/tpm.h
@@ -61,11 +61,13 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes {
TPM2_CC_CLEAR = 0x0126,
TPM2_CC_CLEARCONTROL = 0x0127,
TPM2_CC_HIERCHANGEAUTH = 0x0129,
+ TPM2_CC_PCR_SETAUTHPOL = 0x012C,
TPM2_CC_DAM_RESET = 0x0139,
TPM2_CC_DAM_PARAMETERS = 0x013A,
TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY = 0x017A,
TPM2_CC_PCR_READ = 0x017E,
TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND = 0x0182,
+ TPM2_CC_PCR_SETAUTHVAL = 0x0183,
};
enum tpm2_return_codes {
@@ -559,6 +561,33 @@ uint32_t tpm_nv_write_value(uint32_t index, const void *data, uint32_t length);
*/
int tpm_pcr_event(u32 index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest);
+/**
+ * Issue a TPM_PCR_SetAuthPolicy command.
+ *
+ * @param pw Platform password
+ * @param pw_sz Length of the password
+ * @param index Index of the PCR
+ * @param digest New key to access the PCR
+ *
+ * @return return code of the operation
+ */
+int tpm2_pcr_setauthpolicy(const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz, u32 index,
+ const char *key);
+
+/**
+ * Issue a TPM_PCR_SetAuthValue command.
+ *
+ * @param pw Platform password
+ * @param pw_sz Length of the password
+ * @param index Index of the PCR
+ * @param digest New key to access the PCR
+ * @param key_sz Length of the new key
+ *
+ * @return return code of the operation
+ */
+int tpm2_pcr_setauthvalue(const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz, u32 index,
+ const char *key, const ssize_t key_sz);
+
/**
* Issue a TPM_PCR_Extend command.
*
diff --git a/lib/tpm.c b/lib/tpm.c
index f09b9ce9eb..542449a4ea 100644
--- a/lib/tpm.c
+++ b/lib/tpm.c
@@ -527,6 +527,112 @@ int tpm_pcr_event(u32 index, const void *in_digest, void *out_digest)
return 0;
}
+int tpm2_pcr_setauthpolicy(const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz, u32 index,
+ const char *key)
+{
+ u8 command_v2[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_SESSIONS), /* TAG */
+ STRINGIFY32(35 + pw_sz + TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH), /* Command size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_PCR_SETAUTHPOL), /* Command code */
+
+ /* HANDLE */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_RH_PLATFORM), /* TPM resource handle */
+
+ /* AUTH_SESSION */
+ STRINGIFY32(9 + pw_sz), /* Authorization size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_RS_PW), /* session handle */
+ STRINGIFY16(0), /* Size of <nonce> */
+ /* <nonce> (if any) */
+ 0, /* Attributes: Cont/Excl/Rst */
+ STRINGIFY16(pw_sz) /* Size of <hmac/password> */
+ /* STRING(pw) <hmac/password> (if any) */
+
+ /* TPM2B_AUTH (TPM2B_DIGEST) */
+ /* STRINGIFY16(TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH) Digest size length */
+ /* STRING(key) Digest buffer (PCR key) */
+
+ /* TPMI_ALG_HASH */
+ /* STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ALG_SHA256) Algorithm of the hash */
+
+ /* TPMI_DH_PCR */
+ /* STRINGIFY32(index), PCR Index */
+ };
+ unsigned int offset = 27;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ /*
+ * Fill the command structure starting from the first buffer:
+ * - the password (if any)
+ * - the PCR key length
+ * - the PCR key
+ * - the hash algorithm
+ * - the PCR index
+ */
+ ret = pack_byte_string(command_v2, sizeof(command_v2), "swswd",
+ offset, pw, pw_sz,
+ offset + pw_sz, TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ offset + pw_sz + 2, key, TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ offset + pw_sz + 2 + TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH,
+ TPM2_ALG_SHA256,
+ offset + pw_sz + 4 + TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH, index);
+ offset += pw_sz + 2 + TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH + 2 + 4;
+ if (ret)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ return tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+int tpm2_pcr_setauthvalue(const char *pw, const ssize_t pw_sz, u32 index,
+ const char *key, const ssize_t key_sz)
+{
+ u8 command_v2[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE] = {
+ STRINGIFY16(TPM2_ST_SESSIONS), /* TAG */
+ STRINGIFY32(33 + pw_sz + TPM2_DIGEST_LENGTH), /* Command size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_CC_PCR_SETAUTHVAL), /* Command code */
+
+ /* HANDLE */
+ STRINGIFY32(index), /* Handle (PCR Index) */
+
+ /* AUTH_SESSION */
+ STRINGIFY32(9 + pw_sz), /* Authorization size */
+ STRINGIFY32(TPM2_RS_PW), /* session handle */
+ STRINGIFY16(0), /* Size of <nonce> */
+ /* <nonce> (if any) */
+ 0, /* Attributes: Cont/Excl/Rst */
+ STRINGIFY16(pw_sz), /* Size of <hmac/password> */
+ /* STRING(pw) <hmac/password> (if any) */
+
+ /* TPM2B_DIGEST */
+ /* STRINGIFY16(key_sz) Key length */
+ /* STRING(key) Key */
+ };
+ unsigned int offset = 27;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!is_tpmv2)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ /*
+ * Fill the command structure starting from the first buffer:
+ * - the password (if any)
+ * - the number of digests, 1 in our case
+ * - the algorithm, sha256 in our case
+ * - the digest (64 bytes)
+ */
+ ret = pack_byte_string(command_v2, sizeof(command_v2), "sws",
+ offset, pw, pw_sz,
+ offset + pw_sz, key_sz,
+ offset + pw_sz + 2, key, key_sz);
+ offset += pw_sz + 2 + key_sz;
+ if (ret)
+ return TPM_LIB_ERROR;
+
+ return tpm_sendrecv_command(command_v2, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
int tpm2_pcr_extend(u32 index, const uint8_t *digest)
{
u8 command_v2[COMMAND_BUFFER_SIZE] = {
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support
2018-03-08 15:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Miquel Raynal
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-08 15:40 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] tpm: add PCR authentication commands support Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-08 17:20 ` Tom Rini
2018-03-09 7:53 ` Miquel Raynal
18 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2018-03-08 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification
> (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several
> functions.
>
> This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0
> specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with
> others v2.0 compliant chips.
>
> Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0
> specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to
> distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself
> will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the
> desired command is not supported for the selected specification.
Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on
sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then
setup automated testing?
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180308/86ea4e74/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support
2018-03-08 17:20 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support Tom Rini
@ 2018-03-09 7:53 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-09 12:18 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-09 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:20:30 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
> > Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification
> > (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several
> > functions.
> >
> > This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0
> > specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with
> > others v2.0 compliant chips.
> >
> > Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0
> > specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to
> > distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself
> > will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the
> > desired command is not supported for the selected specification.
>
> Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on
> sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then
> setup automated testing?
>
Not sure I understand your request correctly: the TPM commands are
already available in the sandbox (I don't see what I could add), I just
extended the current set of commands.
However, even with these commands, we won't be able to test them in a
sandbox unless with an actual device.
I probably miss something, can you explain a bit more what you would
like?
Thank you,
Miquèl
--
Miquel Raynal, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support
2018-03-09 7:53 ` Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-09 12:18 ` Tom Rini
2018-03-20 13:36 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2018-03-09 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:53:40AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:20:30 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >
> > > Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification
> > > (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several
> > > functions.
> > >
> > > This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0
> > > specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with
> > > others v2.0 compliant chips.
> > >
> > > Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0
> > > specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to
> > > distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself
> > > will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the
> > > desired command is not supported for the selected specification.
> >
> > Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on
> > sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then
> > setup automated testing?
> >
>
> Not sure I understand your request correctly: the TPM commands are
> already available in the sandbox (I don't see what I could add), I just
> extended the current set of commands.
>
> However, even with these commands, we won't be able to test them in a
> sandbox unless with an actual device.
>
> I probably miss something, can you explain a bit more what you would
> like?
Can we add a valid TPM via QEMU and then test it that way? If so, we
should enable the TPM code on qemu-x86_64 (and, well, if we can pass it
on other arches, other QEMU targets) and write some test/py/tests/ code
that exercises the TPM commands. Does that make sense?
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180309/709ab96d/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support
2018-03-09 12:18 ` Tom Rini
@ 2018-03-20 13:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-20 14:04 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-20 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Tom,
Sorry for the delay.
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 07:18:40 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:53:40AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:20:30 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > >
> > > > Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification
> > > > (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several
> > > > functions.
> > > >
> > > > This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0
> > > > specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with
> > > > others v2.0 compliant chips.
> > > >
> > > > Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0
> > > > specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to
> > > > distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself
> > > > will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the
> > > > desired command is not supported for the selected specification.
> > >
> > > Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on
> > > sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then
> > > setup automated testing?
> > >
> >
> > Not sure I understand your request correctly: the TPM commands are
> > already available in the sandbox (I don't see what I could add), I just
> > extended the current set of commands.
> >
> > However, even with these commands, we won't be able to test them in a
> > sandbox unless with an actual device.
> >
> > I probably miss something, can you explain a bit more what you would
> > like?
>
> Can we add a valid TPM via QEMU and then test it that way? If so, we
> should enable the TPM code on qemu-x86_64 (and, well, if we can pass it
> on other arches, other QEMU targets) and write some test/py/tests/ code
> that exercises the TPM commands. Does that make sense?
>
I suppose this is doable, but for what I know, the effort is
consequent. TPM 2.0 are not compatible at all with TPM 1.x , the
packets exchanged at TPM level are completely different. Hence, I
think there is almost nothing that we can take from the TPM 1.x
implementation already existing in QEMU.
I am certain we all would benefit such a contribution, however I'm
not sure I could handle that anytime soon.
About the series, I think it would be better that I change a macro name
("STRINGIFY", which is wrongly named), I will send a v2 soon, can you
tell me its status otherwise?
Thank you,
Miquèl
--
Miquel Raynal, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support
2018-03-20 13:36 ` Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-20 14:04 ` Tom Rini
2018-03-20 14:51 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2018-03-20 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 02:36:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 07:18:40 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:53:40AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:20:30 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification
> > > > > (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several
> > > > > functions.
> > > > >
> > > > > This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0
> > > > > specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with
> > > > > others v2.0 compliant chips.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0
> > > > > specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to
> > > > > distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself
> > > > > will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the
> > > > > desired command is not supported for the selected specification.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on
> > > > sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then
> > > > setup automated testing?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not sure I understand your request correctly: the TPM commands are
> > > already available in the sandbox (I don't see what I could add), I just
> > > extended the current set of commands.
> > >
> > > However, even with these commands, we won't be able to test them in a
> > > sandbox unless with an actual device.
> > >
> > > I probably miss something, can you explain a bit more what you would
> > > like?
> >
> > Can we add a valid TPM via QEMU and then test it that way? If so, we
> > should enable the TPM code on qemu-x86_64 (and, well, if we can pass it
> > on other arches, other QEMU targets) and write some test/py/tests/ code
> > that exercises the TPM commands. Does that make sense?
> >
>
> I suppose this is doable, but for what I know, the effort is
> consequent. TPM 2.0 are not compatible at all with TPM 1.x , the
> packets exchanged at TPM level are completely different. Hence, I
> think there is almost nothing that we can take from the TPM 1.x
> implementation already existing in QEMU.
Ah, OK. I thought QEMU had a TPM 2.0 implementation now too, but I see
I'm mistaken.
> I am certain we all would benefit such a contribution, however I'm
> not sure I could handle that anytime soon.
>
> About the series, I think it would be better that I change a macro name
> ("STRINGIFY", which is wrongly named), I will send a v2 soon, can you
> tell me its status otherwise?
We have the usual linux/stringify.h header available, so yes, you should
make use of that. And I still would like to see tests written, even if
they can only be executed on $board with $TPM attached via $interface,
with those 3 variables documented so that others can try it out too.
Does that make sense? Thanks!
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180320/0bbb50f6/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support
2018-03-20 14:04 ` Tom Rini
@ 2018-03-20 14:51 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-21 13:49 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-20 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:04:55 -0400, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 02:36:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay.
> >
> > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 07:18:40 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:53:40AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:20:30 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification
> > > > > > (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several
> > > > > > functions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0
> > > > > > specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with
> > > > > > others v2.0 compliant chips.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0
> > > > > > specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to
> > > > > > distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself
> > > > > > will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the
> > > > > > desired command is not supported for the selected specification.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on
> > > > > sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then
> > > > > setup automated testing?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Not sure I understand your request correctly: the TPM commands are
> > > > already available in the sandbox (I don't see what I could add), I just
> > > > extended the current set of commands.
> > > >
> > > > However, even with these commands, we won't be able to test them in a
> > > > sandbox unless with an actual device.
> > > >
> > > > I probably miss something, can you explain a bit more what you would
> > > > like?
> > >
> > > Can we add a valid TPM via QEMU and then test it that way? If so, we
> > > should enable the TPM code on qemu-x86_64 (and, well, if we can pass it
> > > on other arches, other QEMU targets) and write some test/py/tests/ code
> > > that exercises the TPM commands. Does that make sense?
> > >
> >
> > I suppose this is doable, but for what I know, the effort is
> > consequent. TPM 2.0 are not compatible at all with TPM 1.x , the
> > packets exchanged at TPM level are completely different. Hence, I
> > think there is almost nothing that we can take from the TPM 1.x
> > implementation already existing in QEMU.
>
> Ah, OK. I thought QEMU had a TPM 2.0 implementation now too, but I see
> I'm mistaken.
>
> > I am certain we all would benefit such a contribution, however I'm
> > not sure I could handle that anytime soon.
> >
> > About the series, I think it would be better that I change a macro name
> > ("STRINGIFY", which is wrongly named), I will send a v2 soon, can you
> > tell me its status otherwise?
>
> We have the usual linux/stringify.h header available, so yes, you should
> make use of that.
Actually the name is misleading as I don't want to "stringify".
I am looking for a way to easily fill a buffer of bytes from integer
values, ie:
u32 value = 0x12345678;
u8 buf[x] = { MACRO(value), ...} to be {0x12, 0x34, 0x56, 0x78, ...}
> And I still would like to see tests written, even if
> they can only be executed on $board with $TPM attached via $interface,
> with those 3 variables documented so that others can try it out too.
> Does that make sense? Thanks!
I see some TPM tests for v1.x, I can probably add some there. This will
test the library functions but not the "user" commands.
To test the commands, I suggest following the lines I inserted in my
cover letter, but maybe I can put it also in some documentation?
Would this fit your expectations?
[1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-March/322286.html
Thanks,
Miquèl
--
Miquel Raynal, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support
2018-03-20 14:51 ` Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-21 13:49 ` Tom Rini
2018-03-23 14:42 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2018-03-21 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 03:51:22PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:04:55 -0400, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 02:36:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the delay.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 07:18:40 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:53:40AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:20:30 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification
> > > > > > > (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several
> > > > > > > functions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0
> > > > > > > specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with
> > > > > > > others v2.0 compliant chips.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0
> > > > > > > specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to
> > > > > > > distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself
> > > > > > > will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the
> > > > > > > desired command is not supported for the selected specification.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on
> > > > > > sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then
> > > > > > setup automated testing?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Not sure I understand your request correctly: the TPM commands are
> > > > > already available in the sandbox (I don't see what I could add), I just
> > > > > extended the current set of commands.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, even with these commands, we won't be able to test them in a
> > > > > sandbox unless with an actual device.
> > > > >
> > > > > I probably miss something, can you explain a bit more what you would
> > > > > like?
> > > >
> > > > Can we add a valid TPM via QEMU and then test it that way? If so, we
> > > > should enable the TPM code on qemu-x86_64 (and, well, if we can pass it
> > > > on other arches, other QEMU targets) and write some test/py/tests/ code
> > > > that exercises the TPM commands. Does that make sense?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I suppose this is doable, but for what I know, the effort is
> > > consequent. TPM 2.0 are not compatible at all with TPM 1.x , the
> > > packets exchanged at TPM level are completely different. Hence, I
> > > think there is almost nothing that we can take from the TPM 1.x
> > > implementation already existing in QEMU.
> >
> > Ah, OK. I thought QEMU had a TPM 2.0 implementation now too, but I see
> > I'm mistaken.
> >
> > > I am certain we all would benefit such a contribution, however I'm
> > > not sure I could handle that anytime soon.
> > >
> > > About the series, I think it would be better that I change a macro name
> > > ("STRINGIFY", which is wrongly named), I will send a v2 soon, can you
> > > tell me its status otherwise?
> >
> > We have the usual linux/stringify.h header available, so yes, you should
> > make use of that.
>
> Actually the name is misleading as I don't want to "stringify".
>
> I am looking for a way to easily fill a buffer of bytes from integer
> values, ie:
>
> u32 value = 0x12345678;
> u8 buf[x] = { MACRO(value), ...} to be {0x12, 0x34, 0x56, 0x78, ...}
>
>
> > And I still would like to see tests written, even if
> > they can only be executed on $board with $TPM attached via $interface,
> > with those 3 variables documented so that others can try it out too.
> > Does that make sense? Thanks!
>
> I see some TPM tests for v1.x, I can probably add some there. This will
> test the library functions but not the "user" commands.
>
> To test the commands, I suggest following the lines I inserted in my
> cover letter, but maybe I can put it also in some documentation?
>
> Would this fit your expectations?
We have a framework to run those commands on the target and confirm that
they behave as expected. Please write the tests to run those commands
and confirm that they work as expected. Thanks!
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180321/2c8f507a/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support
2018-03-21 13:49 ` Tom Rini
@ 2018-03-23 14:42 ` Simon Glass
2018-03-29 7:39 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2018-03-23 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Miquel,
On 21 March 2018 at 07:49, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 03:51:22PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:04:55 -0400, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 02:36:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> > > Hi Tom,
>> > >
>> > > Sorry for the delay.
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 07:18:40 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:53:40AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> > > > > Hi Tom,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:20:30 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification
>> > > > > > > (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several
>> > > > > > > functions.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0
>> > > > > > > specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with
>> > > > > > > others v2.0 compliant chips.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0
>> > > > > > > specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to
>> > > > > > > distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself
>> > > > > > > will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the
>> > > > > > > desired command is not supported for the selected specification.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on
>> > > > > > sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then
>> > > > > > setup automated testing?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Not sure I understand your request correctly: the TPM commands are
>> > > > > already available in the sandbox (I don't see what I could add), I just
>> > > > > extended the current set of commands.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > However, even with these commands, we won't be able to test them in a
>> > > > > sandbox unless with an actual device.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I probably miss something, can you explain a bit more what you would
>> > > > > like?
>> > > >
>> > > > Can we add a valid TPM via QEMU and then test it that way? If so, we
>> > > > should enable the TPM code on qemu-x86_64 (and, well, if we can pass it
>> > > > on other arches, other QEMU targets) and write some test/py/tests/ code
>> > > > that exercises the TPM commands. Does that make sense?
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > I suppose this is doable, but for what I know, the effort is
>> > > consequent. TPM 2.0 are not compatible at all with TPM 1.x , the
>> > > packets exchanged at TPM level are completely different. Hence, I
>> > > think there is almost nothing that we can take from the TPM 1.x
>> > > implementation already existing in QEMU.
>> >
>> > Ah, OK. I thought QEMU had a TPM 2.0 implementation now too, but I see
>> > I'm mistaken.
>> >
>> > > I am certain we all would benefit such a contribution, however I'm
>> > > not sure I could handle that anytime soon.
>> > >
>> > > About the series, I think it would be better that I change a macro name
>> > > ("STRINGIFY", which is wrongly named), I will send a v2 soon, can you
>> > > tell me its status otherwise?
>> >
>> > We have the usual linux/stringify.h header available, so yes, you should
>> > make use of that.
>>
>> Actually the name is misleading as I don't want to "stringify".
>>
>> I am looking for a way to easily fill a buffer of bytes from integer
>> values, ie:
>>
>> u32 value = 0x12345678;
>> u8 buf[x] = { MACRO(value), ...} to be {0x12, 0x34, 0x56, 0x78, ...}
>>
>>
>> > And I still would like to see tests written, even if
>> > they can only be executed on $board with $TPM attached via $interface,
>> > with those 3 variables documented so that others can try it out too.
>> > Does that make sense? Thanks!
>>
>> I see some TPM tests for v1.x, I can probably add some there. This will
>> test the library functions but not the "user" commands.
>>
>> To test the commands, I suggest following the lines I inserted in my
>> cover letter, but maybe I can put it also in some documentation?
>>
>> Would this fit your expectations?
>
> We have a framework to run those commands on the target and confirm that
> they behave as expected. Please write the tests to run those commands
> and confirm that they work as expected. Thanks!
Re sandbox, it has a TPM emulator used for testing in
tpm_tis_sandbox.c - you should be able to add something similar for
v2.
Regards,
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support
2018-03-23 14:42 ` Simon Glass
@ 2018-03-29 7:39 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-03-29 22:41 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2018-03-29 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Simon and Tom,
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:42:02 -0600, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On 21 March 2018 at 07:49, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 03:51:22PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:04:55 -0400, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 02:36:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >> > > Hi Tom,
> >> > >
> >> > > Sorry for the delay.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 07:18:40 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:53:40AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >> > > > > Hi Tom,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:20:30 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification
> >> > > > > > > (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several
> >> > > > > > > functions.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0
> >> > > > > > > specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with
> >> > > > > > > others v2.0 compliant chips.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0
> >> > > > > > > specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to
> >> > > > > > > distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself
> >> > > > > > > will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the
> >> > > > > > > desired command is not supported for the selected specification.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on
> >> > > > > > sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then
> >> > > > > > setup automated testing?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Not sure I understand your request correctly: the TPM commands are
> >> > > > > already available in the sandbox (I don't see what I could add), I just
> >> > > > > extended the current set of commands.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > However, even with these commands, we won't be able to test them in a
> >> > > > > sandbox unless with an actual device.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I probably miss something, can you explain a bit more what you would
> >> > > > > like?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Can we add a valid TPM via QEMU and then test it that way? If so, we
> >> > > > should enable the TPM code on qemu-x86_64 (and, well, if we can pass it
> >> > > > on other arches, other QEMU targets) and write some test/py/tests/ code
> >> > > > that exercises the TPM commands. Does that make sense?
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I suppose this is doable, but for what I know, the effort is
> >> > > consequent. TPM 2.0 are not compatible at all with TPM 1.x , the
> >> > > packets exchanged at TPM level are completely different. Hence, I
> >> > > think there is almost nothing that we can take from the TPM 1.x
> >> > > implementation already existing in QEMU.
> >> >
> >> > Ah, OK. I thought QEMU had a TPM 2.0 implementation now too, but I see
> >> > I'm mistaken.
> >> >
> >> > > I am certain we all would benefit such a contribution, however I'm
> >> > > not sure I could handle that anytime soon.
> >> > >
> >> > > About the series, I think it would be better that I change a macro name
> >> > > ("STRINGIFY", which is wrongly named), I will send a v2 soon, can you
> >> > > tell me its status otherwise?
> >> >
> >> > We have the usual linux/stringify.h header available, so yes, you should
> >> > make use of that.
> >>
> >> Actually the name is misleading as I don't want to "stringify".
> >>
> >> I am looking for a way to easily fill a buffer of bytes from integer
> >> values, ie:
> >>
> >> u32 value = 0x12345678;
> >> u8 buf[x] = { MACRO(value), ...} to be {0x12, 0x34, 0x56, 0x78, ...}
> >>
> >>
> >> > And I still would like to see tests written, even if
> >> > they can only be executed on $board with $TPM attached via $interface,
> >> > with those 3 variables documented so that others can try it out too.
> >> > Does that make sense? Thanks!
> >>
> >> I see some TPM tests for v1.x, I can probably add some there. This will
> >> test the library functions but not the "user" commands.
> >>
> >> To test the commands, I suggest following the lines I inserted in my
> >> cover letter, but maybe I can put it also in some documentation?
> >>
> >> Would this fit your expectations?
> >
> > We have a framework to run those commands on the target and confirm that
> > they behave as expected. Please write the tests to run those commands
> > and confirm that they work as expected. Thanks!
>
> Re sandbox, it has a TPM emulator used for testing in
> tpm_tis_sandbox.c - you should be able to add something similar for
> v2.
I wrote a complete test suite for all the TPMv2.0 commands. It runs
completely fine with real hardware, see the last patch of the v2 series.
I had a look to sandbox but I'm sorry, I really don't have enough time
for now to achieve this additional work, I really hope the full Python
test suite will be enough.
Regards,
Miquèl
--
Miquel Raynal, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] Introduce SPI TPM v2.0 support
2018-03-29 7:39 ` Miquel Raynal
@ 2018-03-29 22:41 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2018-03-29 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Miquel,
On 29 March 2018 at 15:39, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon and Tom,
>
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:42:02 -0600, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Miquel,
>>
>> On 21 March 2018 at 07:49, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 03:51:22PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> >> Hi Tom,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:04:55 -0400, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 02:36:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> >> > > Hi Tom,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Sorry for the delay.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 07:18:40 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:53:40AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> >> > > > > Hi Tom,
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 12:20:30 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Current U-Boot supports TPM v1.2 specification. The new specification
>> >> > > > > > > (v2.0) is not backward compatible and renames/introduces several
>> >> > > > > > > functions.
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > This series introduces a new SPI driver following the TPM v2.0
>> >> > > > > > > specification. It has been tested on a ST TPM but should be usable with
>> >> > > > > > > others v2.0 compliant chips.
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Then, basic functionalities are introduced one by one for the v2.0
>> >> > > > > > > specification. The INIT command now can receive a parameter to
>> >> > > > > > > distinguish further TPMv1/TPMv2 commands. After that, the library itself
>> >> > > > > > > will know which one is pertinent and will return a special error if the
>> >> > > > > > > desired command is not supported for the selected specification.
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Thanks for doing all of this. Can you please enable this feature on
>> >> > > > > > sandbox and/or an x86 QEMU variant where I assume we could also then
>> >> > > > > > setup automated testing?
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Not sure I understand your request correctly: the TPM commands are
>> >> > > > > already available in the sandbox (I don't see what I could add), I just
>> >> > > > > extended the current set of commands.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > However, even with these commands, we won't be able to test them in a
>> >> > > > > sandbox unless with an actual device.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > I probably miss something, can you explain a bit more what you would
>> >> > > > > like?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Can we add a valid TPM via QEMU and then test it that way? If so, we
>> >> > > > should enable the TPM code on qemu-x86_64 (and, well, if we can pass it
>> >> > > > on other arches, other QEMU targets) and write some test/py/tests/ code
>> >> > > > that exercises the TPM commands. Does that make sense?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I suppose this is doable, but for what I know, the effort is
>> >> > > consequent. TPM 2.0 are not compatible at all with TPM 1.x , the
>> >> > > packets exchanged at TPM level are completely different. Hence, I
>> >> > > think there is almost nothing that we can take from the TPM 1.x
>> >> > > implementation already existing in QEMU.
>> >> >
>> >> > Ah, OK. I thought QEMU had a TPM 2.0 implementation now too, but I see
>> >> > I'm mistaken.
>> >> >
>> >> > > I am certain we all would benefit such a contribution, however I'm
>> >> > > not sure I could handle that anytime soon.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > About the series, I think it would be better that I change a macro name
>> >> > > ("STRINGIFY", which is wrongly named), I will send a v2 soon, can you
>> >> > > tell me its status otherwise?
>> >> >
>> >> > We have the usual linux/stringify.h header available, so yes, you should
>> >> > make use of that.
>> >>
>> >> Actually the name is misleading as I don't want to "stringify".
>> >>
>> >> I am looking for a way to easily fill a buffer of bytes from integer
>> >> values, ie:
>> >>
>> >> u32 value = 0x12345678;
>> >> u8 buf[x] = { MACRO(value), ...} to be {0x12, 0x34, 0x56, 0x78, ...}
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > And I still would like to see tests written, even if
>> >> > they can only be executed on $board with $TPM attached via $interface,
>> >> > with those 3 variables documented so that others can try it out too.
>> >> > Does that make sense? Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> I see some TPM tests for v1.x, I can probably add some there. This will
>> >> test the library functions but not the "user" commands.
>> >>
>> >> To test the commands, I suggest following the lines I inserted in my
>> >> cover letter, but maybe I can put it also in some documentation?
>> >>
>> >> Would this fit your expectations?
>> >
>> > We have a framework to run those commands on the target and confirm that
>> > they behave as expected. Please write the tests to run those commands
>> > and confirm that they work as expected. Thanks!
>>
>> Re sandbox, it has a TPM emulator used for testing in
>> tpm_tis_sandbox.c - you should be able to add something similar for
>> v2.
>
> I wrote a complete test suite for all the TPMv2.0 commands. It runs
> completely fine with real hardware, see the last patch of the v2 series.
> I had a look to sandbox but I'm sorry, I really don't have enough time
> for now to achieve this additional work, I really hope the full Python
> test suite will be enough.
This should not take very long to do. I am not keen to add this new
support without sandbox tests. The Python test suite is a great idea,
but running it on real hardware is not an option for most people.
Lots of people have made big efforts to improve the sandbox testing in
U-Boot. We need to keep pushing it forward, not regressing.
Regards,
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread