From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 11/11] mtd: sf: Make sf_mtd.c more robust
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:59:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181119205955.32042-12-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181119205955.32042-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
SPI flash based MTD devs can be registered/unregistered at any time
through the sf probe command or the spi_flash_free() function.
This commit does not try to fix the root cause as it would probably
require rewriting most of the code and have an mtd_info object
instance per spi_flash object (not to mention that the the spi-flash
layer is likely to be replaced by a spi-nor layer ported from Linux).
Instead, we try to be as safe as can be by checking the code returned
by del_mtd_device() and complain loudly when there's nothing we can
do about the deregistration failure. When that happens we also reset
sf_mtd_info.priv to NULL, and check for NULL pointer in the mtd hooks
so that -ENODEV is returned instead of hitting a NULL pointer
dereference exception when the MTD instance is later accessed by a user.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- New patch
---
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_mtd.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_mtd.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_mtd.c
index aabbc3589435..68c36002bee2 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_mtd.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_mtd.c
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ static int spi_flash_mtd_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
struct spi_flash *flash = mtd->priv;
int err;
+ if (!flash)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
instr->state = MTD_ERASING;
err = spi_flash_erase(flash, instr->addr, instr->len);
@@ -39,6 +42,9 @@ static int spi_flash_mtd_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
struct spi_flash *flash = mtd->priv;
int err;
+ if (!flash)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
err = spi_flash_read(flash, from, len, buf);
if (!err)
*retlen = len;
@@ -52,6 +58,9 @@ static int spi_flash_mtd_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
struct spi_flash *flash = mtd->priv;
int err;
+ if (!flash)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
err = spi_flash_write(flash, to, len, buf);
if (!err)
*retlen = len;
@@ -76,8 +85,13 @@ int spi_flash_mtd_register(struct spi_flash *flash)
{
int ret;
- if (sf_mtd_registered)
- del_mtd_device(&sf_mtd_info);
+ if (sf_mtd_registered) {
+ ret = del_mtd_device(&sf_mtd_info);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ sf_mtd_registered = false;
+ }
sf_mtd_registered = false;
memset(&sf_mtd_info, 0, sizeof(sf_mtd_info));
@@ -110,5 +124,24 @@ int spi_flash_mtd_register(struct spi_flash *flash)
void spi_flash_mtd_unregister(void)
{
- del_mtd_device(&sf_mtd_info);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!sf_mtd_registered)
+ return;
+
+ ret = del_mtd_device(&sf_mtd_info);
+ if (!ret) {
+ sf_mtd_registered = false;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Setting mtd->priv to NULL is the best we can do. Thanks to that,
+ * the MTD layer can still call mtd hooks without risking a
+ * use-after-free bug. Still, things should be fixed to prevent the
+ * spi_flash object from being destroyed when del_mtd_device() fails.
+ */
+ sf_mtd_info.priv = NULL;
+ printf("Failed to unregister MTD %s and the spi_flash object is going away: you're in deep trouble!",
+ sf_mtd_info.name);
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-19 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-19 20:59 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/11] mtd/sf: Various fixes Boris Brezillon
2018-11-19 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 01/11] mtd: Add a function to report when the MTD dev list has been updated Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:44 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-19 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 02/11] mtd: Parse mtdparts/mtdids again when the MTD " Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:44 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-19 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 03/11] mtd: Delete partitions attached to the device when a device is deleted Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:44 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-22 8:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-19 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 04/11] mtd: sf: Make sure we don't register the same device twice Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:45 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-22 7:04 ` Jagan Teki
2018-11-19 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 05/11] mtd: Use get_mtdids() instead of env_get("mtdids") in mtd_search_alternate_name() Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:45 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-19 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 06/11] mtd: Be more strict on the "mtdparts=" prefix check Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:45 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-19 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 07/11] mtd: Make sure the name passed in mtdparts fits in mtd_name[] Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:45 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-19 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 08/11] mtd: Make sure we don't parse MTD partitions belonging to another dev Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:46 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-19 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/11] mtd: Don't stop MTD partition creation when it fails on one device Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:46 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-19 20:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 10/11] mtd: sf: Unregister the MTD device prior to removing the spi_flash obj Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:47 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-22 7:06 ` Jagan Teki
2018-11-19 20:59 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-11-21 6:47 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 11/11] mtd: sf: Make sf_mtd.c more robust Heiko Schocher
2018-11-22 7:10 ` Jagan Teki
2018-11-22 8:40 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-26 8:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-26 11:12 ` Jagan Teki
2018-11-26 12:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-26 12:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-26 13:05 ` Jagan Teki
2018-11-26 13:25 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-11-27 12:36 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-27 15:44 ` Jagan Teki
2018-11-19 21:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/11] mtd/sf: Various fixes Boris Brezillon
2018-11-21 6:43 ` Heiko Schocher
2018-11-21 12:58 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181119205955.32042-12-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox