From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: fix entry_point equal to load_addr
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:51:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200110215155.GT31026@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d8cf919-5f59-b6cc-a12b-446e72c84d67@benettiengineering.com>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 03:57:47PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On 12/7/19 10:28 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:55 PM Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:05:55PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:49 PM Giulio Benetti
> > > > <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello Tom, all,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/6/19 2:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:58:46PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:46 PM Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@st.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This patch is breaking the STM32MP15 basic boot (spl => u-boot).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Looking at socfpga gen5 u-boot.img, this is probably broken as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And I don't even see any RB or TB tags here :-(
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ugh, what the heck? I applied this because I looked over the changes
> > > > > > and they seemed correct. I'm quite willing to just revert this but I
> > > > > > would like to know how it's breaking. Sorry all!
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > IMHO this is due to wrong images creation with mkinage, especially when
> > > > > passing parameters with -a and -e flags.
> > > > >
> > > > > In my case I need them to be:
> > > > > -a 0x80002000 (load address) => CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
> > > > > -e 0x800023FD (entry point where SPL jumps to) => CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START
> > > >
> > > > Well, CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START is only set in 15 files in include/configs, so I
> > > > guess a lot more boards might be broken...
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So *maybe* on STM32MP1 and other broken boards -e
> > > > > (CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START) is not equal to -a (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE) as
> > > > > was assumed before(but wrong).
> > > > >
> > > > > Indeed CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START is set to 0 if not specified in
> > > > > u-boot/Makefile:
> > > > > `
> > > > > # U-Boot entry point, needed for booting of full-blown U-Boot
> > > > > # from the SPL U-Boot version.
> > > > > #
> > > > > ifndef CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START
> > > > > CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START := 0
> > > > > endif
> > > > > `
> > > > >
> > > > > So probably broken boards try to jump to absolute 0.
> > > > > A solving patch would be:
> > > > > ifndef CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START
> > > > > CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START := CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
> > > > > endif
> > > >
> > > > That might work, but I wonder if this is the correct time in the release to do
> > > > so.
> > >
> > > Yes, at this point in the cycle the best option is to revert the
> > > original commit and for the next release bring it back after applying
> > > Patrice's series to fix the bogus default to CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START and
> > > cleaning up defconfigs. Sorry again for all the troubles!
> >
> > I just wanted to confirm socfpga_gen5 doesn't boot with this patch
> > but it's ok again now you reverted it.
>
> Now that patches:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1205064/
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1205063/
>
> and 2020.01 has been released, can you please commit this patch?
>
> I've re-submitted also on patchset to Add i.MXRT family since it's needed to
> boot Linux:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=152468
Yes, this is on my list of things to get back to as I clear out parts of
my queue, thanks for the reminder.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200110/cb9536a8/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-10 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-25 16:18 [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: fix entry_point equal to load_addr Giulio Benetti
2019-12-05 22:09 ` Tom Rini
2019-12-06 12:46 ` Patrice CHOTARD
2019-12-06 12:58 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2019-12-06 13:34 ` Tom Rini
2019-12-06 13:37 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2019-12-06 13:44 ` Tom Rini
2019-12-06 13:48 ` Giulio Benetti
2019-12-06 14:04 ` Patrice CHOTARD
2019-12-06 17:23 ` Giulio Benetti
2019-12-06 14:05 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2019-12-06 14:55 ` Tom Rini
2019-12-07 21:28 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2020-01-10 14:57 ` Giulio Benetti
2020-01-10 21:51 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2020-01-16 14:40 ` Tom Rini
2020-01-16 14:46 ` Giulio Benetti
2020-01-16 14:49 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200110215155.GT31026@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox