public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] Revert "riscv: Clear pending interrupts before enabling IPIs"
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:22:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914142303.21307-2-seanga2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914142303.21307-1-seanga2@gmail.com>

Clearing MIP.MSIP is not guaranteed to do anything by the spec. In
addition, most existing RISC-V hardware does nothing when this bit is set.

The following commits "riscv: Use a valid bit to ignore already-pending
IPIs" and "riscv: Clear pending IPIs on initialization" should implement
the original intent of the reverted commit in a more robust manner.

This reverts commit 9472630337e7c4ac442066b5a752aaa8c3b4d4a6.

Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
---
I know there is still some discussion in the last series on whether to include
this commit, but I'd like to put out another revision and get feedback.

(no changes since v1)

 arch/riscv/cpu/start.S | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/cpu/start.S b/arch/riscv/cpu/start.S
index bf9fdf369b..e3222b1ea7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/cpu/start.S
+++ b/arch/riscv/cpu/start.S
@@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ _start:
 #else
 	li	t0, SIE_SSIE
 #endif
-	/* Clear any pending IPIs */
-	csrc	MODE_PREFIX(ip), t0
 	csrs	MODE_PREFIX(ie), t0
 #endif
 
-- 
2.28.0

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-14 14:22 [PATCH v2 0/7] riscv: Correctly handle IPIs already pending upon boot Sean Anderson
2020-09-14 14:22 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2020-09-15  6:31   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] Revert "riscv: Clear pending interrupts before enabling IPIs" Bin Meng
2020-09-14 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] riscv: Match memory barriers between send_ipi_many and handle_ipi Sean Anderson
2020-09-15  8:40   ` Rick Chen
2020-09-17 11:12   ` Leo Liang
2020-09-14 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] riscv: Use a valid bit to ignore already-pending IPIs Sean Anderson
2020-09-15  6:35   ` Bin Meng
2020-09-15  8:45   ` Rick Chen
2020-09-17 11:14   ` Leo Liang
2020-09-14 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] riscv: Clear pending IPIs on initialization Sean Anderson
2020-09-15  9:15   ` Rick Chen
2020-09-15 10:11     ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-16  1:11       ` Rick Chen
2020-09-14 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] riscv: Consolidate fences into AMOs for available_harts_lock Sean Anderson
2020-09-15  6:36   ` Bin Meng
2020-09-16  1:13   ` Rick Chen
2020-09-14 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] riscv: Ensure gp is NULL or points to valid data Sean Anderson
2020-09-15  6:50   ` Bin Meng
     [not found]   ` <752D002CFF5D0F4FA35C0100F1D73F3FA4743806@ATCPCS16.andestech.com>
2020-09-16  2:23     ` Rick Chen
2020-09-16 10:56       ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-14 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] riscv: Add some comments to start.S Sean Anderson
2020-09-15  6:52   ` Bin Meng
2020-09-16  7:17   ` Rick Chen
2020-09-17 11:15   ` Leo Liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200914142303.21307-2-seanga2@gmail.com \
    --to=seanga2@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox