From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@hitachienergy.com>
Cc: Aleksandar Gerasimovski
<aleksandar.gerasimovski@hitachienergy.com>,
Francis Laniel <francis.laniel@amarulasolutions.com>,
"u-boot@lists.denx.de" <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>,
Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>,
Harald Seiler <hws@denx.de>, Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 28/28] board: keymile: common: Use environment to store IVM_* variables.
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:33:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220620173324.GP2484912@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR06MB72896C7EF46195FADFCF4082F7B09@DB9PR06MB7289.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5586 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:08:32PM +0000, Holger Brunck wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:31:58AM +0200, Francis Laniel wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > These boards used set_local_var() to store some variables as local shell.
> > > > > They then used get_local_var() to retrieve the variables values.
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead of using local shell variables, they should use
> > > > > environment ones (like a majority of board).
> > > > > So, this patch converts using local variables to environment ones.
> > > > >
> > >
> > > why do we need to change that? It is intended that we use this hush
> > > variable infrastructure from u-boot (common/hush.c) for our IVM data
> > > and not the standard env. We read the IVM at boot time and store these
> > > values in RAM. It is not intended to store them permanently in the
> > > flash or wherever the environment is saved. Especially in our case we
> > > have some boards where the environment is in a i2c EEPROM and we don't
> > > want to write down to the EEPROM each time when the board is starting.
> >
> > So, the whole series is about updating hush to bring in a new baseline version of
> > the shell, from busybox.
> >
>
> Ok.
>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Francis Laniel
> > > > > <francis.laniel@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > board/keymile/common/common.c | 8 ++++----
> > > > > board/keymile/common/ivm.c | 9 +--------
> > > > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/board/keymile/common/common.c
> > > > > b/board/keymile/common/common.c index 3999f48719..72939af36e
> > > > > 100644
> > > > > --- a/board/keymile/common/common.c
> > > > > +++ b/board/keymile/common/common.c
> > > > > @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int do_setboardid(struct cmd_tbl
> > > > > *cmdtp, int
> > > > flag, int argc,
> > > > > unsigned char buf[32];
> > > > > char *p;
> > > > >
> > > > > - p = get_local_var("IVM_BoardId");
> > > > > + p = env_get("IVM_BoardId");
> > > > > if (!p) {
> > > > > printf("can't get the IVM_Boardid\n");
> > > > > return 1;
> > > > > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static int do_setboardid(struct cmd_tbl
> > > > > *cmdtp, int
> > > > flag, int argc,
> > > > > env_set("boardid", (char *)buf);
> > > > > printf("set boardid=%s\n", buf);
> > > > >
> > > > > - p = get_local_var("IVM_HWKey");
> > > > > + p = env_get("IVM_HWKey");
> > > > > if (!p) {
> > > > > printf("can't get the IVM_HWKey\n");
> > > > > return 1;
> > > > > @@ -272,14 +272,14 @@ static int do_checkboardidhwk(struct cmd_tbl
> > > > *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> > > > > * first read out the real inventory values, these values are
> > > > > * already stored in the local hush variables
> > > > > */
> > > > > - p = get_local_var("IVM_BoardId");
> > > > > + p = env_get("IVM_BoardId");
> > > > > if (!p) {
> > > > > printf("can't get the IVM_Boardid\n");
> > > > > return 1;
> > > > > }
> > > > > rc = strict_strtoul(p, 16, &ivmbid);
> > > > >
> > > > > - p = get_local_var("IVM_HWKey");
> > > > > + p = env_get("IVM_HWKey");
> > > > > if (!p) {
> > > > > printf("can't get the IVM_HWKey\n");
> > > > > return 1;
> > > > > diff --git a/board/keymile/common/ivm.c
> > > > > b/board/keymile/common/ivm.c index 67db0c50f4..e266d7ce81 100644
> > > > > --- a/board/keymile/common/ivm.c
> > > > > +++ b/board/keymile/common/ivm.c
> > > > > @@ -44,14 +44,7 @@ static int ivm_calc_crc(unsigned char *buf, int
> > > > > len)
> > > > >
> > > > > static int ivm_set_value(char *name, char *value) {
> > > > > - char tempbuf[256];
> > > > > -
> > > > > - if (value) {
> > > > > - sprintf(tempbuf, "%s=%s", name, value);
> > > > > - return set_local_var(tempbuf, 0);
> > > > > - }
> > > > > - unset_local_var(name);
> > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > + return env_set(name, value);
> > >
> > > this means we are now writing always down to the permanent environment
> > > or? And this I would really like to avoid in our case.
> >
> > Note that "env_set" does not force a save of the running environment.
>
> Ah yes you are right. But still for the first boot of our board we will call saveenv
> to store an initial environment and with this change it would also write down
> the IVM data which is currently only stored temporary in RAM.
>
> > These variables will be exposed to the CLI run-time, which I am not sure if they
> > are today, so if the user then does "saveenv" they will be written. That I think
> > would be a functional difference.
> >
>
> yes exactly and I wonder if this functionality will be also possible after the rework.
> I mean our use case (even it seems we are the only ones using it) is quite useful
> I think. We read out inventory data from an EEPROM and they are parsed and
> temporary stored in RAM and then we are able to use them as any other
> environment variables without the need to store them permanently. I also would
> like to avoid this as the data should be permanently in the IVM only and not stored
> a second time permanently in flash.
So, I'll start by noting that the environment variable flag support
isn't as well documented as I would like. But my super quick glance
makes me wonder if ENV_FLAGS_VARACCESS_WRITEABLE does what you're
thinking about, and if not, if it would be useful to extend the flag
support to include a "hidden" flag, or otherwise way to indicate that
variables A/B/C should never be saved. This could be useful for other
cases as well.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-20 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-16 22:31 [RFC PATCH v4 00/28] Modernize U-Boot shell Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/28] video: sandbox: Add dummy function for sandbox_sdl_remove_display() Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/28] test: Add framework to test hush behavior Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/28] test: hush: Test hush if/else Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/28] test/py: hush_if_test: Remove the test file Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/28] test: hush: Test hush variable expansion Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/28] test: hush: Test hush commands list Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/28] test: hush: Test hush loops Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/28] cli: Add Busybox upstream hush.c file Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/28] cli: Port Busybox 2021 hush to U-Boot Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/28] cli: Add menu for hush parser Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/28] global_data.h: add GD_FLG_HUSH_OLD_PARSER flag Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/28] cmd: Add new parser command Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/28] cli: Enables using hush 2021 parser as command line parser Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/28] cli: hush_2021: Enable variables expansion for hush 2021 Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/28] cli: hush_2021: Add functions to be called from run_command() Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/28] cli: add hush 2021 as parser for run_command*() Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/28] test: hush: Fix instructions list tests for hush 2021 Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/28] test: hush: Fix variable expansion " Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/28] cli: hush_2021: Enable using \< and \> as string compare operators Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/28] cli: hush_2021: Enable if keyword Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/28] test: hush: Fix if tests for hush 2021 Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/28] cli: hush_2021: Enable loops Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/28] test: hush: Fix loop tests for hush 2021 Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/28] Modernize U-Boot shell Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/28] cli: hush_2021: Add upstream commits up to 6th February 2022 Francis Laniel
2022-06-20 19:11 ` Tom Rini
2022-08-12 20:56 ` Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/28] for test purpose only: Comment out dollar tests which prints error messages Francis Laniel
2022-06-17 14:02 ` Tom Rini
2022-08-12 21:12 ` Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 27/28] for test purpose only: Comment out failed function which fails only in CI Francis Laniel
2022-06-17 14:49 ` Tom Rini
2022-10-10 20:52 ` [PATCH] for debug purpose only: add print to debug odd behavior Francis Laniel
2022-06-16 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 28/28] board: keymile: common: Use environment to store IVM_* variables Francis Laniel
2022-06-17 14:48 ` Tom Rini
2022-06-20 14:46 ` Aleksandar Gerasimovski
2022-06-20 15:27 ` Holger Brunck
2022-06-20 15:35 ` Tom Rini
2022-06-20 16:08 ` Holger Brunck
2022-06-20 17:33 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2022-08-12 21:01 ` Francis Laniel
2022-08-15 8:13 ` Holger Brunck
2022-06-17 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/28] Modernize U-Boot shell Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220620173324.GP2484912@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=aleksandar.gerasimovski@hitachienergy.com \
--cc=francis.laniel@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=holger.brunck@hitachienergy.com \
--cc=hs@denx.de \
--cc=hws@denx.de \
--cc=marek.behun@nic.cz \
--cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox