U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>,
	Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
Cc: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	u-boot@lists.denx.de, "Simon Glass" <sjg@chromium.org>,
	"Philipp Tomsich" <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>,
	"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>,
	"Jagan Teki" <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
	"Suniel Mahesh" <sunil@amarulasolutions.com>,
	"Klaus Goger" <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>,
	jonas@kwiboo.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] rockchip: px30: migrate to common bss and stack addresses + UART fixes for evb-px30
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 08:15:24 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240522141524.GH2568172@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2148002.OBFZWjSADL@diego>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3923 bytes --]

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 02:14:47PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2024, 10:39:25 CEST schrieb Quentin Schulz:
> > Hi Tom,
> > 
> > On 5/21/24 8:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 07:39:53PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > >> PX30 Ringneck ran out of memory in the allocation pool of U-Boot proper
> > >> pre-reloc. Something needed to be done. Jonas did migrate a few SoCs
> > >> already to this common bss+stack addresses so it made sense to follow
> > >> the same route for one additional SoC: PX30.
> > >>
> > >> While at it, also fix a few issues related to UART on the PX30 Mini EVB
> > >> I could test.
> > >>
> > >> Boot (to U-Boot CLI) tested on PX30 Ringneck and PX30 Mini-EVB.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks to Jonas for hinting where to look at.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
> > >> ---
> > >> Quentin Schulz (10):
> > >>        rockchip: px30: default TPL_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to 0x600 on PX30 Kconfig level
> > >>        rockchip: Use common bss and stack addresses on PX30
> > >>        rockchip: ringneck_px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> > >>        rockchip: evb-px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> > >>        rockchip: firefly-px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> > >>        rockchip: odroid-go2: Use common bss and stack addresses
> > >>        rockchip: px30-core-*: Use common bss and stack addresses
> > >>        rockchip: px30: make UART pinmux accessible to TPL/SPL DTB
> > >>        rockchip: evb-px30: do not remove pinctrl nodes from SPL DTB
> > >>        rockchip: evb-px30: make UART5 the debug UART
> > >>
> > >>   arch/arm/dts/px30-u-boot.dtsi                 | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > >>   arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30/Kconfig           |  8 +++++++-
> > >>   configs/evb-px30_defconfig                    | 23 +++++------------------
> > >>   configs/firefly-px30_defconfig                | 19 +++----------------
> > >>   configs/odroid-go2_defconfig                  | 19 +++----------------
> > >>   configs/px30-core-ctouch2-of10-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> > >>   configs/px30-core-ctouch2-px30_defconfig      | 19 +++----------------
> > >>   configs/px30-core-edimm2.2-px30_defconfig     | 19 +++----------------
> > >>   configs/ringneck-px30_defconfig               | 19 +++----------------
> > >>   9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
> > >> ---
> > >> base-commit: a7f0154c412859323396111dd0c09dbafbc153cb
> > >> change-id: 20240521-px30-2024-07-rc-7136f6241d29
> > > 
> > > As I assume we want to fix the platforms for v2024.07, is this the level
> > > of config changes everyone is comfortable with on the platforms? Or
> > > should we just go with the minimum for release and the rest to -next?
> > > 
> > 
> > I can tell you that Ringneck doesn't work anymore on v2024.07-rc, but 
> > the PX30 Mini EVB was still reaching U-Boot CLI without the changes. I 
> > don't know about the other boards.
> > 
> > So I could split this into two series, one for master, one for next.
> > 
> > I could suggest: patch 1 to 3 in master, the rest in next. Patch 1 is 
> > just moving things around. Patch 2 is doing nothing if nobody uses 
> > ROCKCHIP_COMMON_STACK_ADDR and SPL_SHARES_INIT_SP_ADDR (which is the 
> > case for px30 boards). Patch 3 is for fixing Ringneck, which I know is 
> > broken.
> > 
> > Heiko having access to the Odroid Go2, maybe he could test without my 
> > patches and see if it reaches the CLI to know if we should pull it in 
> > for master as well.
> 
> I did that yesterday evening. The Odroid Go2 also reached u-boot CLI
> and also booted without these changes. So I guess it's small enough
> or whatever.
> 
> So at least the Go2 is fine on 2024.07-rc3 either way with or without
> this series.

OK, thanks. I'll grab 1-3 for master shortly then.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-22 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-21 17:39 [PATCH 00/10] rockchip: px30: migrate to common bss and stack addresses + UART fixes for evb-px30 Quentin Schulz
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 01/10] rockchip: px30: default TPL_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to 0x600 on PX30 Kconfig level Quentin Schulz
2024-05-21 20:22   ` Heiko Stübner
2024-05-23  3:48   ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 02/10] rockchip: Use common bss and stack addresses on PX30 Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23  3:48   ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 03/10] rockchip: ringneck_px30: Use common bss and stack addresses Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23  3:48   ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 04/10] rockchip: evb-px30: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23  3:48   ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 05/10] rockchip: firefly-px30: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23  3:48   ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 06/10] rockchip: odroid-go2: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23  3:48   ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 07/10] rockchip: px30-core-*: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23  3:48   ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 08/10] rockchip: px30: make UART pinmux accessible to TPL/SPL DTB Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23  3:49   ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 09/10] rockchip: evb-px30: do not remove pinctrl nodes from SPL DTB Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23  3:49   ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 10/10] rockchip: evb-px30: make UART5 the debug UART Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23  3:49   ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 18:04 ` [PATCH 00/10] rockchip: px30: migrate to common bss and stack addresses + UART fixes for evb-px30 Tom Rini
2024-05-22  8:39   ` Quentin Schulz
2024-05-22 12:14     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-05-22 14:15       ` Tom Rini [this message]
2024-05-21 19:16 ` Heiko Stübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240522141524.GH2568172@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=foss+uboot@0leil.net \
    --cc=heiko.stuebner@cherry.de \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com \
    --cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
    --cc=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=sunil@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox