From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
Suniel Mahesh <sunil@amarulasolutions.com>,
Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>,
jonas@kwiboo.se, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] rockchip: px30: migrate to common bss and stack addresses + UART fixes for evb-px30
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 14:14:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2148002.OBFZWjSADL@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c9a78f7a-5b63-4d37-93d4-2c6bd8db0076@cherry.de>
Am Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2024, 10:39:25 CEST schrieb Quentin Schulz:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 5/21/24 8:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 07:39:53PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >> PX30 Ringneck ran out of memory in the allocation pool of U-Boot proper
> >> pre-reloc. Something needed to be done. Jonas did migrate a few SoCs
> >> already to this common bss+stack addresses so it made sense to follow
> >> the same route for one additional SoC: PX30.
> >>
> >> While at it, also fix a few issues related to UART on the PX30 Mini EVB
> >> I could test.
> >>
> >> Boot (to U-Boot CLI) tested on PX30 Ringneck and PX30 Mini-EVB.
> >>
> >> Thanks to Jonas for hinting where to look at.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
> >> ---
> >> Quentin Schulz (10):
> >> rockchip: px30: default TPL_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to 0x600 on PX30 Kconfig level
> >> rockchip: Use common bss and stack addresses on PX30
> >> rockchip: ringneck_px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> >> rockchip: evb-px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> >> rockchip: firefly-px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> >> rockchip: odroid-go2: Use common bss and stack addresses
> >> rockchip: px30-core-*: Use common bss and stack addresses
> >> rockchip: px30: make UART pinmux accessible to TPL/SPL DTB
> >> rockchip: evb-px30: do not remove pinctrl nodes from SPL DTB
> >> rockchip: evb-px30: make UART5 the debug UART
> >>
> >> arch/arm/dts/px30-u-boot.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30/Kconfig | 8 +++++++-
> >> configs/evb-px30_defconfig | 23 +++++------------------
> >> configs/firefly-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> configs/odroid-go2_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> configs/px30-core-ctouch2-of10-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> configs/px30-core-ctouch2-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> configs/px30-core-edimm2.2-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> configs/ringneck-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> 9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
> >> ---
> >> base-commit: a7f0154c412859323396111dd0c09dbafbc153cb
> >> change-id: 20240521-px30-2024-07-rc-7136f6241d29
> >
> > As I assume we want to fix the platforms for v2024.07, is this the level
> > of config changes everyone is comfortable with on the platforms? Or
> > should we just go with the minimum for release and the rest to -next?
> >
>
> I can tell you that Ringneck doesn't work anymore on v2024.07-rc, but
> the PX30 Mini EVB was still reaching U-Boot CLI without the changes. I
> don't know about the other boards.
>
> So I could split this into two series, one for master, one for next.
>
> I could suggest: patch 1 to 3 in master, the rest in next. Patch 1 is
> just moving things around. Patch 2 is doing nothing if nobody uses
> ROCKCHIP_COMMON_STACK_ADDR and SPL_SHARES_INIT_SP_ADDR (which is the
> case for px30 boards). Patch 3 is for fixing Ringneck, which I know is
> broken.
>
> Heiko having access to the Odroid Go2, maybe he could test without my
> patches and see if it reaches the CLI to know if we should pull it in
> for master as well.
I did that yesterday evening. The Odroid Go2 also reached u-boot CLI
and also booted without these changes. So I guess it's small enough
or whatever.
So at least the Go2 is fine on 2024.07-rc3 either way with or without
this series.
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-21 17:39 [PATCH 00/10] rockchip: px30: migrate to common bss and stack addresses + UART fixes for evb-px30 Quentin Schulz
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 01/10] rockchip: px30: default TPL_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to 0x600 on PX30 Kconfig level Quentin Schulz
2024-05-21 20:22 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 02/10] rockchip: Use common bss and stack addresses on PX30 Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 03/10] rockchip: ringneck_px30: Use common bss and stack addresses Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 04/10] rockchip: evb-px30: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 05/10] rockchip: firefly-px30: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 06/10] rockchip: odroid-go2: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 07/10] rockchip: px30-core-*: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 08/10] rockchip: px30: make UART pinmux accessible to TPL/SPL DTB Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:49 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 09/10] rockchip: evb-px30: do not remove pinctrl nodes from SPL DTB Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:49 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 10/10] rockchip: evb-px30: make UART5 the debug UART Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:49 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 18:04 ` [PATCH 00/10] rockchip: px30: migrate to common bss and stack addresses + UART fixes for evb-px30 Tom Rini
2024-05-22 8:39 ` Quentin Schulz
2024-05-22 12:14 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-05-22 14:15 ` Tom Rini
2024-05-21 19:16 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2148002.OBFZWjSADL@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=foss+uboot@0leil.net \
--cc=heiko.stuebner@cherry.de \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com \
--cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
--cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=sunil@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox