From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>
To: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>,
"Scholz, Kevin" <k-scholz@ti.com>
Cc: Franz Schnyder <fra.schnyder@gmail.com>,
trini@konsulko.com, s-k6@ti.com, bb@ti.com, m-chawdhry@ti.com,
u-boot@lists.denx.de, u-kumar1@ti.com, gehariprasath@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] arm: dts: k3-am69: ddr: Update to v0.12.0 of DDR config tool
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:16:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251120081659.GA12514@francesco-nb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b1b5496-cbd2-4ac4-85cc-2b8da653bbdd@ti.com>
Hello Neha, Kevin
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 09:55:08AM +0530, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
> On 07/11/25 21:14, Franz Schnyder wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 12:40:33PM +0530, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
> >> +#define DDRSS0_CTL_178_DATA 0x35000000
> >> +#define DDRSS0_CTL_186_DATA 0x00353500
> >> +#define DDRSS0_PI_275_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS0_PI_281_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS0_PI_287_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS0_PI_293_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> ....
> >> +#define DDRSS1_CTL_178_DATA 0x35000000
> >> +#define DDRSS1_CTL_186_DATA 0x00353500
> >> +#define DDRSS1_PI_275_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS1_PI_281_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS1_PI_287_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS1_PI_293_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> ....
> >> +#define DDRSS2_CTL_178_DATA 0x35000000
> >> +#define DDRSS2_CTL_186_DATA 0x00353500
> >> +#define DDRSS2_PI_275_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS2_PI_281_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS2_PI_287_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS2_PI_293_DATA 0x00F30084
> >> ....
> >> +#define DDRSS3_CTL_178_DATA 0x35350000
> >> +#define DDRSS3_CTL_186_DATA 0x00353535
> >> +#define DDRSS3_PI_275_DATA 0x35F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS3_PI_281_DATA 0x35F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS3_PI_287_DATA 0x35F30084
> >> +#define DDRSS3_PI_293_DATA 0x35F30084
> >
> > When I compare the updated configuration to the one for our Aquila AM69
> > board, I can observe that you have set an on-die termination at boot
> > frequency only for DRAM3. DRAM, DRAM1 and DRAM2 do not seem to have any
> > termination enabled. Is this a mistake or is it intentional?
>
> Kevin, could you explain the reasoning for this?
Any update on this?
Thanks
Francesco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-03 7:10 [PATCH v2 0/7] ti: j7: Update to v0.12.0 of DDR config tool Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] arm: dts: k3-j7200: ddr: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] arm: dts: k3-j721s2: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] arm: dts: k3-am68: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] arm: dts: k3-j784s4: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm: dts: k3-am69: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-07 15:44 ` Franz Schnyder
2025-11-10 4:25 ` Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-20 8:16 ` Francesco Dolcini [this message]
2025-11-20 14:23 ` [EXTERNAL] " Scholz, Kevin
2025-11-20 14:48 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-04-21 10:10 ` Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] arm: dts: k3-j742s2: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] doc: ti: k3: Add section for DDR configuration Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 14:35 ` Romain Naour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251120081659.GA12514@francesco-nb \
--to=francesco@dolcini.it \
--cc=bb@ti.com \
--cc=fra.schnyder@gmail.com \
--cc=gehariprasath@ti.com \
--cc=k-scholz@ti.com \
--cc=m-chawdhry@ti.com \
--cc=n-francis@ti.com \
--cc=s-k6@ti.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox