[PATCH v3 9/9] usb: xhci: convert to readx_poll_sleep_timeout()

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On 9/9/20 4:05 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:02 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/9/20 3:46 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 7:05 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/9/20 3:55 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:15 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/8/20 5:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 7:13 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/8/20 3:44 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 3:14 PM Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Use readx_poll_sleep_timeout() to poll the register status
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> v3: no changes
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> v2: fix typo of title suggested by Frank
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>  drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
>>>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks. So now I have half of a RESEND patchset with RB tags, and
>>>>>>>> another half of just RB tags without patchset. Can someone of you please
>>>>>>>> collect the tags and resend the patchset once more with the collected
>>>>>>>> tags, so it's all in one place ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe the latest version has all the RB tags.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you, I cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox,
>>>>>> because the original patches are just not there.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can use patchwork to help the custodian work. I found it very
>>>>> helpful to download the patches from patchwork and apply.
>>>>
>>>> Can you also comment on patches via patchwork ?
>>>>
>>>> I mean, really, can we please just stick to the usual workflow ? That's
>>>> all I am asking for , nothing else, nothing new.
>>>
>>> I don't understand the question about "usual workflow". You asked "I
>>> cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox" and I
>>> recommended patchwork which will satisfy the requirement of what you
>>> asked.
>>
>> Right, I can, but if there is more I want to say about the patch, I
>> cannot do it with patchwork. Then I need the patch, which I don't have.
>> Hence my remark about the usual email-based workflow.
> 
> Yes, that's true. If we need to post comments about patches, we will
> have to use email.

The problem here is that for whatever reason, I didn't receive the
original patches, Frank had to resend them, then I got RBs on some of
each and it was a mess. I'd just like to get back to the usual. I think
we agree, don't we ?

Anyway, thanks for the RBs, that really helped.