From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
<x86@kernel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
<virtualization@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdmsr() definitions
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 10:03:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afqhbl9pKKwsVjOy@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260429184521.7AADEE4C@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 11:45:21AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> +/*
> + * Common paravirt and native helpers:
> + */
> +#define rdmsr(msr, low, high) \
> +do { \
> + u64 __val = paravirt_read_msr((msr)); \
> + (void)((low) = (u32)__val); \
> + (void)((high) = (u32)(__val >> 32)); \
> +} while (0)
Rather than direct all (paravirt and native) invocations of rdmsr() to
paravirt_*(), does it make sense to first introduce the common version of
helpers and direct the common version of helpers to paravirt_* or native_*?
So, we can have
+/*
+ * Common paravirt and native helpers:
+ */
+#define rdmsr(msr, low, high) \
+do { \
+ u64 __val = common_read_msr((msr)); \
+ (void)((low) = (u32)__val); \
+ (void)((high) = (u32)(__val >> 32)); \
+} while (0)
with below changes in patch 1.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 9c2ea29e12a9..7ba5bc921526 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -171,8 +171,19 @@ static inline u64 native_read_pmc(int counter)
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
+#define common_read_msr paravirt_read_msr
+#define common_read_msr_safe paravirt_read_msr_safe
+#define common_write_msr paravirt_write_msr
+#define common_write_msr_safe paravirt_write_msr_safe
#else
#include <linux/errno.h>
+
+/* Short-circuit the paravirt MSR infrastructure when it is disabled: */
+#define common_read_msr native_read_msr
+#define common_read_msr_safe native_read_msr_safe
+#define common_write_msr native_write_msr
+#define common_write_msr_safe native_write_msr_safe
+
/*
* Access to machine-specific registers (available on 586 and better only)
* Note: the rd* operations modify the parameters directly (without using
@@ -181,35 +192,35 @@ static inline u64 native_read_pmc(int counter)
#define rdmsr(msr, low, high) \
do { \
- u64 __val = native_read_msr((msr)); \
+ u64 __val = common_read_msr((msr)); \
(void)((low) = (u32)__val); \
(void)((high) = (u32)(__val >> 32)); \
} while (0)
static inline void wrmsr(u32 msr, u32 low, u32 high)
{
- native_write_msr(msr, (u64)high << 32 | low);
+ common_write_msr(msr, (u64)high << 32 | low);
}
#define rdmsrq(msr, val) \
- ((val) = native_read_msr((msr)))
+ ((val) = common_read_msr((msr)))
static inline void wrmsrq(u32 msr, u64 val)
{
- native_write_msr(msr, val);
+ common_write_msr(msr, val);
}
/* wrmsr with exception handling */
static inline int wrmsrq_safe(u32 msr, u64 val)
{
- return native_write_msr_safe(msr, val);
+ return common_write_msr_safe(msr, val);
}
/* rdmsr with exception handling */
#define rdmsr_safe(msr, low, high) \
({ \
u64 __val; \
- int __err = native_read_msr_safe((msr), &__val); \
+ int __err = common_read_msr_safe((msr), &__val); \
(*low) = (u32)__val; \
(*high) = (u32)(__val >> 32); \
__err; \
@@ -217,7 +228,7 @@ static inline int wrmsrq_safe(u32 msr, u64 val)
static inline int rdmsrq_safe(u32 msr, u64 *p)
{
- return native_read_msr_safe(msr, p);
+ return common_read_msr_safe(msr, p);
}
static __always_inline u64 rdpmc(int counter)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 18:45 [PATCH v2 0/8] x86/msr: Consolidate native/paravirt MSR functions Dave Hansen
2026-04-29 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] x86/msr: Use paravirt "calls" in common code Dave Hansen
2026-04-29 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdmsr() definitions Dave Hansen
2026-05-06 2:03 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2026-05-06 10:25 ` Yan Zhao
2026-05-06 11:09 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-07 8:21 ` Yan Zhao
2026-04-29 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdmsr_safe() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-04-30 19:43 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2026-04-29 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdmsrq() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-04-29 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] x86/msr: Consolidate {rd,wr}msr[q]_safe() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-04-29 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] x86/msr: Consolidate rdpmc() implementations Dave Hansen
2026-04-29 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] x86/msr: Remove old crusty comment Dave Hansen
2026-04-29 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] x86/msr: Remove duplicate #include Dave Hansen
2026-04-30 7:20 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-04-30 17:42 ` Dave Hansen
2026-04-30 19:22 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-04-30 7:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] x86/msr: Consolidate native/paravirt MSR functions Jürgen Groß
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afqhbl9pKKwsVjOy@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox