From: "Joshua Hintze" <joshh@imsar.com>
To: 'Jeffrey Hundstad' <jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:55:55 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004301cb58fd$d66b0860$83411920$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C97ACBC.3050303@mnsu.edu>
Thank you,
The biggest effect I saw playing around with these is that when
dirty_expire_centisecs is set at 0 writes speeds drastically decrease, but
they are more constant.
I compared all the settings for these registers versus the 2.6.10 kernel and
most of them are the same except for dirty_ratio. I made all of the
registers that were available (since the newer kernels have more) but I
didn't see any drastic improvement.
I'll continue playing with them. Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Hundstad [mailto:jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:50 PM
To: Joshua Hintze
Subject: Re: PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel
Can you try the following:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs
and/or
echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_expire_centisecs
You can find info. about these at:
http://www.linuxinsight.com/proc_sys_vm_hierarchy.html
http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/linux-pdflush.htm
On 09/16/2010 06:30 PM, Joshua Hintze wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been digging into this for a couple weeks now. I have an embedded
board
> that runs Linux Kernel 2.6.10 that is connected to a SSD over a PATA
> connection. Data is transferred using UDMA4 speeds and I get a nice
> sustained write speed of about 20 MBps which is adequate for us.
>
> I have recently taken the plunge to update to a newer version of the
kernel
> starting at 2.6.32 (also tried 2.6.33) and what I am seeing writes speeds
> drop to about 18 MBps peak with large jumps going from 8 MBps->16 MBs for
> sustained throughput.
>
> I decided to read up on the ATA specification and I connected a logic
> analyzer to the PATA bus and here is what is happening...after a large
chunk
> of data is written to the device, instead of the device pausing the
transfer
> by asserting DDMARDY it actual initiates a device data-out termination by
> pulling DMARQ low.
>
> The old kernel 2.6.10 responds to this by strobing the STOP line 8 times
> within 800uS and the device releases DMARQ shortly afterwards. On the
newer
> kernels the strobing of the STOP line takes near 8mS of time. Since the
hard
> drive only release DMARQ after this 8 pulse strobe I believe this is the
> cause of the slower write speeds on the newer kernels. This whole process
> happens thousands of times when writing megs of data. So those extra 7mS
> begin to add up fast.
>
> My problem is I've been digging through the ide.c/ide-dma.c and other code
> but I'm not exactly sure where the code would jump to upon a device
> initiated termination on a data-out dma transfer.
>
> My guess is ide_dma_intr(...). Is this correct?
>
> Any other areas I could look at?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3143 - Release Date: 09/20/10
00:35:00
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-20 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-16 23:30 PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel Joshua Hintze
2010-09-17 13:47 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2010-09-17 13:47 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2010-09-18 17:12 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 17:12 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 19:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-09-18 19:43 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 19:43 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 19:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-18 19:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-18 20:02 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 20:02 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 20:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-19 0:59 ` Alan Cox
2010-09-19 0:59 ` Alan Cox
2010-09-19 4:23 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-19 4:23 ` Joshua Hintze
[not found] ` <4C97ACBC.3050303@mnsu.edu>
2010-09-20 19:55 ` Joshua Hintze [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-16 21:22 Joshua Hintze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004301cb58fd$d66b0860$83411920$@com' \
--to=joshh@imsar.com \
--cc=jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.