All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: Joshua Hintze <joshh@imsar.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 21:22:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284837774.12425.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <010901cb5754$ae6735a0$0b35a0e0$@com>

On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 11:12 -0600, Joshua Hintze wrote:
> Some updated information. I created a screen capture of what I am seeing. First is the logic analyzer when the newer linux kernel is writing slow to the PATA port.
> 
> http://i56.tinypic.com/oqhrug.png
> 
> Notice in the above link how there is a lot of activating and then large gaps of no activity. After about 9 mS the STOP line is strobed a few times and then DMARQ finally returns to normal operating. The link below shows the picture of an old 2.6.10 kernel where write speeds are much faster.
> 
> http://i51.tinypic.com/a9wiur.png
> 
> In the above image notice how the wait time is considerable less 100's of microseconds before the stop lines get strobed.
> 
> I'm dedicated to continue working on the problem, I just need to advice from the linux community. I've tried different I/O schedulers such as noop and anticipatory and I'm studying the ide-dma code but still lost to where this is happening.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
Maybe you can just bisect this?
Just a general advice, I don't know ide subsystem at all.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky


  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-18 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-16 23:30 PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel Joshua Hintze
2010-09-17 13:47 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2010-09-17 13:47   ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2010-09-18 17:12   ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 17:12     ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 19:22     ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2010-09-18 19:43       ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 19:43         ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 19:47         ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-18 19:47           ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-18 20:02           ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 20:02             ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 20:04       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-19  0:59     ` Alan Cox
2010-09-19  0:59       ` Alan Cox
2010-09-19  4:23       ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-19  4:23         ` Joshua Hintze
     [not found] ` <4C97ACBC.3050303@mnsu.edu>
2010-09-20 19:55   ` Joshua Hintze
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-16 21:22 Joshua Hintze

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1284837774.12425.1.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=joshh@imsar.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.