From: "Joshua Hintze" <joshh@imsar.com>
To: 'Randy Dunlap' <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: 'Maxim Levitsky' <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:02:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <010e01cb576c$7909c900$6b1d5b00$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100918124750.393a64a8.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
I got you.
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:rdunlap@xenotime.net]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 1:48 PM
To: Joshua Hintze
Cc: 'Maxim Levitsky'; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:43:40 -0600 Joshua Hintze wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by bisect, other than just the definition of
the word. I am breaking this problem down adding printks etc. I think I'm
finally beginng to understand how this works :)
>
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-bisect.html
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#using-bisec
t
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Maxim Levitsky
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 1:23 PM
> To: Joshua Hintze
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel
>
> On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 11:12 -0600, Joshua Hintze wrote:
> > Some updated information. I created a screen capture of what I am
seeing. First is the logic analyzer when the newer linux kernel is writing
slow to the PATA port.
> >
> > http://i56.tinypic.com/oqhrug.png
> >
> > Notice in the above link how there is a lot of activating and then large
gaps of no activity. After about 9 mS the STOP line is strobed a few times
and then DMARQ finally returns to normal operating. The link below shows the
picture of an old 2.6.10 kernel where write speeds are much faster.
> >
> > http://i51.tinypic.com/a9wiur.png
> >
> > In the above image notice how the wait time is considerable less 100's
of microseconds before the stop lines get strobed.
> >
> > I'm dedicated to continue working on the problem, I just need to advice
from the linux community. I've tried different I/O schedulers such as noop
and anticipatory and I'm studying the ide-dma code but still lost to where
this is happening.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> Maybe you can just bisect this?
> Just a general advice, I don't know ide subsystem at all.
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3132 - Release Date: 09/18/10
00:34:00
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Joshua Hintze" <joshh@imsar.com>
To: "'Randy Dunlap'" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: "'Maxim Levitsky'" <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:02:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <010e01cb576c$7909c900$6b1d5b00$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100918124750.393a64a8.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
I got you.
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:rdunlap@xenotime.net]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 1:48 PM
To: Joshua Hintze
Cc: 'Maxim Levitsky'; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:43:40 -0600 Joshua Hintze wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by bisect, other than just the definition of
the word. I am breaking this problem down adding printks etc. I think I'm
finally beginng to understand how this works :)
>
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-bisect.html
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#using-bisec
t
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Maxim Levitsky
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 1:23 PM
> To: Joshua Hintze
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel
>
> On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 11:12 -0600, Joshua Hintze wrote:
> > Some updated information. I created a screen capture of what I am
seeing. First is the logic analyzer when the newer linux kernel is writing
slow to the PATA port.
> >
> > http://i56.tinypic.com/oqhrug.png
> >
> > Notice in the above link how there is a lot of activating and then large
gaps of no activity. After about 9 mS the STOP line is strobed a few times
and then DMARQ finally returns to normal operating. The link below shows the
picture of an old 2.6.10 kernel where write speeds are much faster.
> >
> > http://i51.tinypic.com/a9wiur.png
> >
> > In the above image notice how the wait time is considerable less 100's
of microseconds before the stop lines get strobed.
> >
> > I'm dedicated to continue working on the problem, I just need to advice
from the linux community. I've tried different I/O schedulers such as noop
and anticipatory and I'm studying the ide-dma code but still lost to where
this is happening.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> Maybe you can just bisect this?
> Just a general advice, I don't know ide subsystem at all.
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3132 - Release Date: 09/18/10
00:34:00
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-18 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-16 23:30 PATA IDE is slower in newer versions of kernel Joshua Hintze
2010-09-17 13:47 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2010-09-17 13:47 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2010-09-18 17:12 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 17:12 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 19:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-09-18 19:43 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 19:43 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 19:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-18 19:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-09-18 20:02 ` Joshua Hintze [this message]
2010-09-18 20:02 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-18 20:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-19 0:59 ` Alan Cox
2010-09-19 0:59 ` Alan Cox
2010-09-19 4:23 ` Joshua Hintze
2010-09-19 4:23 ` Joshua Hintze
[not found] ` <4C97ACBC.3050303@mnsu.edu>
2010-09-20 19:55 ` Joshua Hintze
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-16 21:22 Joshua Hintze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='010e01cb576c$7909c900$6b1d5b00$@com' \
--to=joshh@imsar.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.