All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4
Date: 18 Jul 2002 11:28:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1027016939.1086.127.camel@sinai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0207181900390.30902-100000@divine.city.tvnet.hu>

On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 10:25, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:

> And my point (you asked for comments) was that, this is only (the
> harder) part of the solution making Linux a more reliable (no OOM
> killing *and* root always has the control) and cost effective platform
> (no need for occasionally very complex and continuous resource limit
> setup/adjusting, especially for inexpert home/etc users).

I understand your point, and you are entirely right.

But it is a _completely_ unrelated issue.  The goal here is to not
overcommit memory and I think we succeeded.

An orthogonal issue is per-user resource limits and this may need to be
coupled with that.  It is not a problem I am trying to solve, however.

	Robert Love


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4
Date: 18 Jul 2002 11:28:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1027016939.1086.127.camel@sinai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0207181900390.30902-100000@divine.city.tvnet.hu>

On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 10:25, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:

> And my point (you asked for comments) was that, this is only (the
> harder) part of the solution making Linux a more reliable (no OOM
> killing *and* root always has the control) and cost effective platform
> (no need for occasionally very complex and continuous resource limit
> setup/adjusting, especially for inexpert home/etc users).

I understand your point, and you are entirely right.

But it is a _completely_ unrelated issue.  The goal here is to not
overcommit memory and I think we succeeded.

An orthogonal issue is per-user resource limits and this may need to be
coupled with that.  It is not a problem I am trying to solve, however.

	Robert Love

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-07-18 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-11 22:28 [PATCH] strict VM overcommit Robert Love
2002-07-12 17:30 ` [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4 Robert Love
2002-07-12 17:30   ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 15:22   ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 15:22     ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 16:31     ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 16:31       ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 16:36       ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 16:36         ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 17:42         ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 17:42           ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 17:25           ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 17:25             ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 17:31             ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 17:31               ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 18:32               ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 18:32                 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:58               ` Alan Cox
2002-07-18 19:58                 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-18 18:01                 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 18:01                   ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 18:52                 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 18:52                   ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 20:52                   ` Alan Cox
2002-07-18 20:52                     ` Alan Cox
2002-07-19  6:17                 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-19  6:17                   ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 22:22               ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-18 22:22                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-19  7:47                 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-19  7:47                   ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 18:28             ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-07-18 18:28               ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 17:50               ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 17:50                 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 19:25                 ` stoffel
2002-07-18 19:25                   ` stoffel
2002-07-19  5:52                   ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-19  5:52                     ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 18:56               ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 18:56                 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 19:03                 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:03                   ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:19                   ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 19:19                     ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 19:22                     ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:22                       ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 20:49                       ` Alan Cox
2002-07-18 20:49                         ` Alan Cox
2002-07-19 16:49                   ` Amit Shah
2002-07-19 17:16                     ` Robert Love
2002-07-20  5:02                       ` Amit Shah
2002-07-18 19:10                 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:10                   ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:35                   ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 19:35                     ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 19:41                     ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-07-18 19:41                       ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-07-18 20:23                       ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 20:23                         ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 20:43                         ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-07-18 20:43                           ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-07-19  7:30                   ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-19  7:30                     ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-19 18:06                     ` Robert Love
2002-07-19 18:06                       ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 22:24             ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-18 22:24               ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-18 22:30               ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 22:30                 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 22:08 ` [PATCH] strict VM overcommit Adrian Bunk
2002-07-18 22:27   ` Robert Love
2002-07-19 11:02     ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-20  0:32   ` Alan Cox
2002-07-21  9:10     ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-21 13:32       ` Alan Cox
2002-07-21 12:46         ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-21 14:33           ` Jos Hulzink
2002-07-22  0:43             ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-21 16:46           ` Alan Cox
2002-07-21 15:23         ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-21 19:01           ` Alan Cox
2002-07-22  8:08             ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-22 13:00               ` Alan Cox
2002-07-22 12:45                 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-07-22 14:01                   ` Alan Cox
2002-07-22  1:12           ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-22  8:03             ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-22 10:23               ` Thunder from the hill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1027016939.1086.127.camel@sinai \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=szaka@sienet.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.