From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4
Date: 18 Jul 2002 15:30:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1027031422.1555.161.camel@sinai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207181923180.12241-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 15:24, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I see no reason to not merge this (useful) part. Not only
> is it useful on its own, it's also a necessary ingredient
> of whatever "complete solution" to control per-user resource
> limits.
I am glad we agree here - resource limits and strict overcommit are two
separate solutions to various problems. Some they solve individually,
others they solve together.
I may use one, the other, both, or neither. A clean abstract solution
allows this.
Robert Love
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4
Date: 18 Jul 2002 15:30:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1027031422.1555.161.camel@sinai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207181923180.12241-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 15:24, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I see no reason to not merge this (useful) part. Not only
> is it useful on its own, it's also a necessary ingredient
> of whatever "complete solution" to control per-user resource
> limits.
I am glad we agree here - resource limits and strict overcommit are two
separate solutions to various problems. Some they solve individually,
others they solve together.
I may use one, the other, both, or neither. A clean abstract solution
allows this.
Robert Love
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-18 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-11 22:28 [PATCH] strict VM overcommit Robert Love
2002-07-12 17:30 ` [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4 Robert Love
2002-07-12 17:30 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 15:22 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 15:22 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 16:31 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 16:31 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 16:36 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 16:36 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 17:42 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 17:42 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 17:25 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 17:25 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 17:31 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 17:31 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 18:32 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 18:32 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:58 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-18 19:58 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-18 18:01 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 18:01 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 18:52 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 18:52 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 20:52 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-18 20:52 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-19 6:17 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-19 6:17 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 22:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-18 22:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-19 7:47 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-19 7:47 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 18:28 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 18:28 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 17:50 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 17:50 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 19:25 ` stoffel
2002-07-18 19:25 ` stoffel
2002-07-19 5:52 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-19 5:52 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-18 18:56 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 18:56 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 19:03 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:03 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:19 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 19:19 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 19:22 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:22 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 20:49 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-18 20:49 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-19 16:49 ` Amit Shah
2002-07-19 17:16 ` Robert Love
2002-07-20 5:02 ` Amit Shah
2002-07-18 19:10 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:10 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 19:35 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 19:35 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 19:41 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-07-18 19:41 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-07-18 20:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 20:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 20:43 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-07-18 20:43 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-07-19 7:30 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-19 7:30 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-19 18:06 ` Robert Love
2002-07-19 18:06 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 22:24 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-18 22:24 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-18 22:30 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-07-18 22:30 ` Robert Love
2002-07-18 22:08 ` [PATCH] strict VM overcommit Adrian Bunk
2002-07-18 22:27 ` Robert Love
2002-07-19 11:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-20 0:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-21 9:10 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-21 13:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-21 12:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-21 14:33 ` Jos Hulzink
2002-07-22 0:43 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-21 16:46 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-21 15:23 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-21 19:01 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-22 8:08 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-22 13:00 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-22 12:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-07-22 14:01 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-22 1:12 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-22 8:03 ` Szakacsits Szabolcs
2002-07-22 10:23 ` Thunder from the hill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1027031422.1555.161.camel@sinai \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=szaka@sienet.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.