From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Matt <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41
Date: 14 Oct 2002 17:55:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1034643354.19094.149.camel@cog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DAB6385.9000207@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 17:38, Matthew Dobson wrote:
> Also, right now, memblks map to nodes in a straightforward manner (1-1
> on NUMA-Q, the only architecture that has defined them). It will likely
> look the same on most architectures, too.
Just an FYI: I believe the x440 breaks this assumption.
There are 2 chunks on the first CEC. The current discontig patch for it
has to drop the second chunk (anything over 3.5G on the first CEC) in
order to work w/ the existing code. However, that will probably need to
be addressed at some point, so be aware that this might affect you as
well.
thanks
-john
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Matt <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41
Date: 14 Oct 2002 17:55:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1034643354.19094.149.camel@cog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DAB6385.9000207@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 17:38, Matthew Dobson wrote:
> Also, right now, memblks map to nodes in a straightforward manner (1-1
> on NUMA-Q, the only architecture that has defined them). It will likely
> look the same on most architectures, too.
Just an FYI: I believe the x440 breaks this assumption.
There are 2 chunks on the first CEC. The current discontig patch for it
has to drop the second chunk (anything over 3.5G on the first CEC) in
order to work w/ the existing code. However, that will probably need to
be addressed at some point, so be aware that this might affect you as
well.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-15 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-10 1:12 [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41 Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 3:05 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-10 3:05 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-10 18:29 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 18:29 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 4:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-10 4:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-10 18:43 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 18:43 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 9:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-10 18:55 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 18:55 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 10:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-10 11:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-10 11:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-10 11:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-10 11:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-10 19:09 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:09 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:06 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:06 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:01 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:01 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-13 22:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-13 22:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-15 0:14 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:14 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 0:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 0:38 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:38 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 0:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 0:51 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:51 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 0:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 0:55 ` john stultz [this message]
2002-10-15 0:55 ` [Lse-tech] " john stultz
2002-10-15 1:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 17:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-15 17:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1034643354.19094.149.camel@cog \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.