From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
Martin Bligh <mjbligh@us.ibm.com>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:55:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA5CD19.80603@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1034240403.1745.0.camel@localhost.localdomain
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 03:12, Matthew Dobson wrote:
>
>>Greetings & Salutations,
>> Here's a wonderful patch that I know you're all dying for... Memory
>>Binding! It works just like CPU Affinity (binding) except that it binds
>>a processes memory allocations (just buddy allocator for now) to
>>specific memory blocks.
>
> If the VM works right just doing CPU binding ought to be enough, surely?
You'll have to look at the response I wrote to Andrew's question along
the same
lines... This patch is for processes who feel that the VM *isn't* doing
quite what they want, and want different behavior.
Cheers!
-Matt
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
Martin Bligh <mjbligh@us.ibm.com>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:55:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA5CD19.80603@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1034240403.1745.0.camel@localhost.localdomain
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 03:12, Matthew Dobson wrote:
>
>>Greetings & Salutations,
>> Here's a wonderful patch that I know you're all dying for... Memory
>>Binding! It works just like CPU Affinity (binding) except that it binds
>>a processes memory allocations (just buddy allocator for now) to
>>specific memory blocks.
>
> If the VM works right just doing CPU binding ought to be enough, surely?
You'll have to look at the response I wrote to Andrew's question along
the same
lines... This patch is for processes who feel that the VM *isn't* doing
quite what they want, and want different behavior.
Cheers!
-Matt
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-10 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-10 1:12 [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41 Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 3:05 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-10 3:05 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-10 18:29 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 18:29 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 4:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-10 4:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-10 18:43 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 18:43 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 9:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-10 18:55 ` Matthew Dobson [this message]
2002-10-10 18:55 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 10:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-10 11:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-10 11:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-10 11:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-10 11:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-10 19:09 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:09 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:06 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:06 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:01 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:01 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-13 22:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-13 22:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-15 0:14 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:14 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 0:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 0:38 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:38 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 0:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 0:51 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:51 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 0:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 0:55 ` [Lse-tech] " john stultz
2002-10-15 0:55 ` john stultz
2002-10-15 1:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 17:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-15 17:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DA5CD19.80603@us.ibm.com \
--to=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mjbligh@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.