From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.65
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:23:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048295098626@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10482950921680@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <1048295086481@kroah.com>
ChangeSet 1.1196, 2003/03/21 16:45:59-08:00, greg@kroah.com
i2c: ugh, clean up lindent mess in i2c-proc.c::i2c_detect()
Yes, this function now goes beyond 80 columns, but it's almost
readable, while the previous version was not.
Also removed some #ifdefs
drivers/i2c/i2c-proc.c | 180 ++++++++++++-------------------------------------
1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
diff -Nru a/drivers/i2c/i2c-proc.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-proc.c
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-proc.c Fri Mar 21 16:52:31 2003
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-proc.c Fri Mar 21 16:52:31 2003
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
This driver puts entries in /proc/sys/dev/sensors for each I2C device
*/
+/* #define DEBUG 1 */
+
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -581,9 +583,9 @@
is_isa ? SENSORS_ISA_BUS : i2c_adapter_id(adapter);
/* Forget it if we can't probe using SMBUS_QUICK */
- if ((!is_isa)
- && !i2c_check_functionality(adapter,
- I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK)) return -1;
+ if ((!is_isa) &&
+ !i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK))
+ return -1;
for (addr = 0x00; addr <= (is_isa ? 0xffff : 0x7f); addr++) {
/* XXX: WTF is going on here??? */
@@ -594,31 +596,14 @@
/* If it is in one of the force entries, we don't do any
detection at all */
found = 0;
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (this_force - address_data->forces + i, this_force->force); i++) {
- for (j = 0;
- !found
- && (this_force->force[j] != SENSORS_I2C_END);
- j += 2) {
- if (
- ((adapter_id = this_force->force[j])
- ||
- ((this_force->
- force[j] = SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS)
- && !is_isa))
- && (addr = this_force->force[j + 1])) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found force parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n",
- adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
- if (
- (err - found_proc(adapter, addr, 0,
- this_force->
- kind))) return err;
+ for (i = 0; !found && (this_force = address_data->forces + i, this_force->force); i++) {
+ for (j = 0; !found && (this_force->force[j] != SENSORS_I2C_END); j += 2) {
+ if ( ((adapter_id = this_force->force[j]) ||
+ ((this_force->force[j] = SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) && !is_isa)) &&
+ (addr = this_force->force[j + 1]) ) {
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found force parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
+ if ((err = found_proc(adapter, addr, 0, this_force->kind)))
+ return err;
found = 1;
}
}
@@ -628,42 +613,22 @@
/* If this address is in one of the ignores, we can forget about it
right now */
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (address_data->ignore[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END);
- i += 2) {
- if (
- ((adapter_id = address_data->ignore[i])
- ||
- ((address_data->
- ignore[i] = SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS)
- && !is_isa))
- && (addr = address_data->ignore[i + 1])) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found ignore parameter for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->ignore[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 2) {
+ if ( ((adapter_id = address_data->ignore[i]) ||
+ ((address_data->ignore[i] = SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) &&
+ !is_isa)) &&
+ (addr = address_data->ignore[i + 1])) {
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found ignore parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (address_data->ignore_range[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END);
- i += 3) {
- if (
- ((adapter_id = address_data->ignore_range[i])
- ||
- ((address_data->
- ignore_range[i] =
- SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) & !is_isa))
- && (addr >= address_data->ignore_range[i + 1])
- && (addr <= address_data->ignore_range[i + 2])) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found ignore_range parameter for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->ignore_range[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 3) {
+ if ( ((adapter_id = address_data->ignore_range[i]) ||
+ ((address_data-> ignore_range[i] = SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) &
+ !is_isa)) &&
+ (addr >= address_data->ignore_range[i + 1]) &&
+ (addr <= address_data->ignore_range[i + 2])) {
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found ignore_range parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
@@ -673,68 +638,31 @@
/* Now, we will do a detection, but only if it is in the normal or
probe entries */
if (is_isa) {
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (address_data->normal_isa[i] !- SENSORS_ISA_END); i += 1) {
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->normal_isa[i] != SENSORS_ISA_END); i += 1) {
if (addr = address_data->normal_isa[i]) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found normal isa entry for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id,
- addr);
-#endif
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found normal isa entry for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (address_data->normal_isa_range[i] !- SENSORS_ISA_END); i += 3) {
- if ((addr >- address_data->normal_isa_range[i])
- && (addr <- address_data->normal_isa_range[i + 1])
- &&
- ((addr -
- address_data->normal_isa_range[i]) %
- address_data->normal_isa_range[i + 2] =
- 0)) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found normal isa_range entry for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->normal_isa_range[i] != SENSORS_ISA_END); i += 3) {
+ if ((addr >= address_data->normal_isa_range[i]) &&
+ (addr <= address_data->normal_isa_range[i + 1]) &&
+ ((addr - address_data->normal_isa_range[i]) % address_data->normal_isa_range[i + 2] = 0)) {
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found normal isa_range entry for adapter %d, addr %04x", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
} else {
- for (i = 0;
- !found && (address_data->normal_i2c[i] !- SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 1) {
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->normal_i2c[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 1) {
if (addr = address_data->normal_i2c[i]) {
found = 1;
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found normal i2c entry for adapter %d, "
- "addr %02x", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found normal i2c entry for adapter %d, addr %02x", adapter_id, addr);
}
}
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (address_data->normal_i2c_range[i] !- SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 2) {
- if ((addr >- address_data->normal_i2c_range[i])
- && (addr <- address_data->normal_i2c_range[i + 1]))
- {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found normal i2c_range entry for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->normal_i2c_range[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 2) {
+ if ((addr >= address_data->normal_i2c_range[i]) &&
+ (addr <= address_data->normal_i2c_range[i + 1])) {
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found normal i2c_range entry for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
@@ -747,30 +675,17 @@
((address_data->
probe[i] = SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) & !is_isa))
&& (addr = address_data->probe[i + 1])) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found probe parameter for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found probe parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
- for (i = 0; !found &&
- (address_data->probe_range[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END);
- i += 3) {
- if (
- ((adapter_id = address_data->probe_range[i])
- ||
- ((address_data->probe_range[i] =
- SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) & !is_isa))
- && (addr >= address_data->probe_range[i + 1])
- && (addr <= address_data->probe_range[i + 2])) {
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->probe_range[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 3) {
+ if ( ((adapter_id = address_data->probe_range[i]) ||
+ ((address_data->probe_range[i] = SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) & !is_isa)) &&
+ (addr >= address_data->probe_range[i + 1]) &&
+ (addr <= address_data->probe_range[i + 2])) {
found = 1;
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found probe_range parameter for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found probe_range parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
}
}
if (!found)
@@ -779,8 +694,7 @@
/* OK, so we really should examine this address. First check
whether there is some client here at all! */
if (is_isa ||
- (i2c_smbus_xfer
- (adapter, addr, 0, 0, 0, I2C_SMBUS_QUICK, NULL) >= 0))
+ (i2c_smbus_xfer (adapter, addr, 0, 0, 0, I2C_SMBUS_QUICK, NULL) >= 0))
if ((err = found_proc(adapter, addr, 0, -1)))
return err;
}
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.65
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048295098626@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10482950921680@kroah.com>
ChangeSet 1.1196, 2003/03/21 16:45:59-08:00, greg@kroah.com
i2c: ugh, clean up lindent mess in i2c-proc.c::i2c_detect()
Yes, this function now goes beyond 80 columns, but it's almost
readable, while the previous version was not.
Also removed some #ifdefs
drivers/i2c/i2c-proc.c | 180 ++++++++++++-------------------------------------
1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
diff -Nru a/drivers/i2c/i2c-proc.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-proc.c
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-proc.c Fri Mar 21 16:52:31 2003
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-proc.c Fri Mar 21 16:52:31 2003
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
This driver puts entries in /proc/sys/dev/sensors for each I2C device
*/
+/* #define DEBUG 1 */
+
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -581,9 +583,9 @@
is_isa ? SENSORS_ISA_BUS : i2c_adapter_id(adapter);
/* Forget it if we can't probe using SMBUS_QUICK */
- if ((!is_isa)
- && !i2c_check_functionality(adapter,
- I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK)) return -1;
+ if ((!is_isa) &&
+ !i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK))
+ return -1;
for (addr = 0x00; addr <= (is_isa ? 0xffff : 0x7f); addr++) {
/* XXX: WTF is going on here??? */
@@ -594,31 +596,14 @@
/* If it is in one of the force entries, we don't do any
detection at all */
found = 0;
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (this_force =
- address_data->forces + i, this_force->force); i++) {
- for (j = 0;
- !found
- && (this_force->force[j] != SENSORS_I2C_END);
- j += 2) {
- if (
- ((adapter_id == this_force->force[j])
- ||
- ((this_force->
- force[j] == SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS)
- && !is_isa))
- && (addr == this_force->force[j + 1])) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found force parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n",
- adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
- if (
- (err =
- found_proc(adapter, addr, 0,
- this_force->
- kind))) return err;
+ for (i = 0; !found && (this_force = address_data->forces + i, this_force->force); i++) {
+ for (j = 0; !found && (this_force->force[j] != SENSORS_I2C_END); j += 2) {
+ if ( ((adapter_id == this_force->force[j]) ||
+ ((this_force->force[j] == SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) && !is_isa)) &&
+ (addr == this_force->force[j + 1]) ) {
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found force parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
+ if ((err = found_proc(adapter, addr, 0, this_force->kind)))
+ return err;
found = 1;
}
}
@@ -628,42 +613,22 @@
/* If this address is in one of the ignores, we can forget about it
right now */
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (address_data->ignore[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END);
- i += 2) {
- if (
- ((adapter_id == address_data->ignore[i])
- ||
- ((address_data->
- ignore[i] == SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS)
- && !is_isa))
- && (addr == address_data->ignore[i + 1])) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found ignore parameter for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->ignore[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 2) {
+ if ( ((adapter_id == address_data->ignore[i]) ||
+ ((address_data->ignore[i] == SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) &&
+ !is_isa)) &&
+ (addr == address_data->ignore[i + 1])) {
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found ignore parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (address_data->ignore_range[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END);
- i += 3) {
- if (
- ((adapter_id == address_data->ignore_range[i])
- ||
- ((address_data->
- ignore_range[i] ==
- SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) & !is_isa))
- && (addr >= address_data->ignore_range[i + 1])
- && (addr <= address_data->ignore_range[i + 2])) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found ignore_range parameter for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->ignore_range[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 3) {
+ if ( ((adapter_id == address_data->ignore_range[i]) ||
+ ((address_data-> ignore_range[i] == SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) &
+ !is_isa)) &&
+ (addr >= address_data->ignore_range[i + 1]) &&
+ (addr <= address_data->ignore_range[i + 2])) {
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found ignore_range parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
@@ -673,68 +638,31 @@
/* Now, we will do a detection, but only if it is in the normal or
probe entries */
if (is_isa) {
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (address_data->normal_isa[i] !=
- SENSORS_ISA_END); i += 1) {
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->normal_isa[i] != SENSORS_ISA_END); i += 1) {
if (addr == address_data->normal_isa[i]) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found normal isa entry for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id,
- addr);
-#endif
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found normal isa entry for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (address_data->normal_isa_range[i] !=
- SENSORS_ISA_END); i += 3) {
- if ((addr >=
- address_data->normal_isa_range[i])
- && (addr <=
- address_data->normal_isa_range[i + 1])
- &&
- ((addr -
- address_data->normal_isa_range[i]) %
- address_data->normal_isa_range[i + 2] ==
- 0)) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found normal isa_range entry for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->normal_isa_range[i] != SENSORS_ISA_END); i += 3) {
+ if ((addr >= address_data->normal_isa_range[i]) &&
+ (addr <= address_data->normal_isa_range[i + 1]) &&
+ ((addr - address_data->normal_isa_range[i]) % address_data->normal_isa_range[i + 2] == 0)) {
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found normal isa_range entry for adapter %d, addr %04x", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
} else {
- for (i = 0;
- !found && (address_data->normal_i2c[i] !=
- SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 1) {
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->normal_i2c[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 1) {
if (addr == address_data->normal_i2c[i]) {
found = 1;
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found normal i2c entry for adapter %d, "
- "addr %02x", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found normal i2c entry for adapter %d, addr %02x", adapter_id, addr);
}
}
- for (i = 0;
- !found
- && (address_data->normal_i2c_range[i] !=
- SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 2) {
- if ((addr >=
- address_data->normal_i2c_range[i])
- && (addr <=
- address_data->normal_i2c_range[i + 1]))
- {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found normal i2c_range entry for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->normal_i2c_range[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 2) {
+ if ((addr >= address_data->normal_i2c_range[i]) &&
+ (addr <= address_data->normal_i2c_range[i + 1])) {
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found normal i2c_range entry for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
@@ -747,30 +675,17 @@
((address_data->
probe[i] == SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) & !is_isa))
&& (addr == address_data->probe[i + 1])) {
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found probe parameter for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found probe parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
found = 1;
}
}
- for (i = 0; !found &&
- (address_data->probe_range[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END);
- i += 3) {
- if (
- ((adapter_id == address_data->probe_range[i])
- ||
- ((address_data->probe_range[i] ==
- SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) & !is_isa))
- && (addr >= address_data->probe_range[i + 1])
- && (addr <= address_data->probe_range[i + 2])) {
+ for (i = 0; !found && (address_data->probe_range[i] != SENSORS_I2C_END); i += 3) {
+ if ( ((adapter_id == address_data->probe_range[i]) ||
+ ((address_data->probe_range[i] == SENSORS_ANY_I2C_BUS) & !is_isa)) &&
+ (addr >= address_data->probe_range[i + 1]) &&
+ (addr <= address_data->probe_range[i + 2])) {
found = 1;
-#ifdef DEBUG
- printk
- (KERN_DEBUG "i2c-proc.o: found probe_range parameter for adapter %d, "
- "addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
-#endif
+ dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "found probe_range parameter for adapter %d, addr %04x\n", adapter_id, addr);
}
}
if (!found)
@@ -779,8 +694,7 @@
/* OK, so we really should examine this address. First check
whether there is some client here at all! */
if (is_isa ||
- (i2c_smbus_xfer
- (adapter, addr, 0, 0, 0, I2C_SMBUS_QUICK, NULL) >= 0))
+ (i2c_smbus_xfer (adapter, addr, 0, 0, 0, I2C_SMBUS_QUICK, NULL) >= 0))
if ((err = found_proc(adapter, addr, 0, -1)))
return err;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-22 1:04 [BK PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.65 Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22 1:04 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22 1:04 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22 1:04 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22 1:04 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22 1:04 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22 1:04 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22 1:04 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22 1:04 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22 1:04 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-25 9:35 ` Pavel Machek
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-25 1:29 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-25 2:04 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Dave Jones
2003-03-25 3:34 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.66 Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Albert Cranford
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19 6:23 ` [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.69 Philip Pokorny
2003-03-22 2:33 ` [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.65 Petr Vandrovec
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Petr Vandrovec
2003-03-23 8:49 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-03 0:14 [BK PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.66 Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 0:15 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 6:21 ` Albert Cranford
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Albert Cranford
2003-04-03 6:33 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 13:06 ` Albert Cranford
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Albert Cranford
2003-04-03 16:37 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:55 [BK PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.69 Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:35 [BK PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.70 Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-06-12 2:40 ` Philip Pokorny
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Philip Pokorny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1048295098626@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.