All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ac9410@attbi.com (Albert Cranford)
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.66
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:23:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E8BD2D9.8050002@attbi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1049328958830@kroah.com

I read the thread concerning the removal of proc.c & proc.h
but hope that this does not go to Linus until the interface
between i2c & sensors to application is somewhat defined.

At the moment we have a sysctl API used by sensors, video and
other i2c kernel applications that is working.
Our desire to switch the sensors to sysfs interface should not
break other applications.  At least until we have a model/api
to propose to these other drivers.

In my personal home systems I use it87 driver and have been
somewhat successful in switching to sysfs.  A big blocking
point is there is no application to read/set/monitor the
driver, so it is basically unverified.  I would hate to
put other i2c applications in the same boat.
Your thoughts?
Albert

Greg KH wrote:
> ChangeSet 1.977.29.8, 2003/04/02 11:45:21-08:00, greg@kroah.com
> 
> i2c: remove proc and sysctl code from i2c-proc as it is no longer used.
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Albert Cranford <ac9410@attbi.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.66
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 01:21:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E8BD2D9.8050002@attbi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1049328958830@kroah.com

I read the thread concerning the removal of proc.c & proc.h
but hope that this does not go to Linus until the interface
between i2c & sensors to application is somewhat defined.

At the moment we have a sysctl API used by sensors, video and
other i2c kernel applications that is working.
Our desire to switch the sensors to sysfs interface should not
break other applications.  At least until we have a model/api
to propose to these other drivers.

In my personal home systems I use it87 driver and have been
somewhat successful in switching to sysfs.  A big blocking
point is there is no application to read/set/monitor the
driver, so it is basically unverified.  I would hate to
put other i2c applications in the same boat.
Your thoughts?
Albert

Greg KH wrote:
> ChangeSet 1.977.29.8, 2003/04/02 11:45:21-08:00, greg@kroah.com
> 
> i2c: remove proc and sysctl code from i2c-proc as it is no longer used.
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-19  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-03  0:14 [BK PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.66 Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15   ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15     ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15       ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15         ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15           ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23             ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15             ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15               ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23                 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15                 ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15                   ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15                     ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15                       ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15                         ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15                           ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  0:15                             ` Greg KH
2003-04-03  6:21                 ` Albert Cranford [this message]
2005-05-19  6:23                   ` Albert Cranford
2003-04-03  6:33                   ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23                     ` Greg KH
2003-04-03 13:06                     ` Albert Cranford
2005-05-19  6:23                       ` Albert Cranford
2003-04-03 16:37                       ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23                         ` Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-11 20:35 [BK PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.70 Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23   ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36   ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23     ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36     ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23       ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36       ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23         ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36         ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23           ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 20:36           ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23             ` Greg KH
2003-06-12  2:40   ` Philip Pokorny
2005-05-19  6:23     ` Philip Pokorny
2003-05-09 23:55 [BK PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.69 Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23   ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56   ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23     ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56     ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23       ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56       ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23         ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56         ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23           ` Greg KH
2003-05-09 23:56           ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23             ` Greg KH
2003-03-22  1:04 [BK PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.65 Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22  1:04 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23   ` Greg KH
2003-03-22  1:04   ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23     ` Greg KH
2003-03-22  1:04     ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23       ` Greg KH
2003-03-22  1:04       ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23         ` Greg KH
2003-03-22  1:04         ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23           ` Greg KH
2003-03-22  1:04           ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23             ` Greg KH
2003-03-22  1:04             ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23               ` Greg KH
2003-03-22  1:04               ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23                 ` Greg KH
2003-03-22  1:04                 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23                   ` Greg KH
2003-03-25  9:35                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-05-19  6:23                   ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-25  1:29                   ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23                     ` Greg KH
2003-03-25  2:04                     ` Dave Jones
2005-05-19  6:23                       ` Dave Jones
2003-03-25  3:34                       ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23                         ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23         ` [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.66 Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23         ` Albert Cranford
2005-05-19  6:23         ` Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19  6:23         ` [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.69 Philip Pokorny
2003-03-22  2:33     ` [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.65 Petr Vandrovec
2005-05-19  6:23       ` Petr Vandrovec
2003-03-23  8:49       ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:23         ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E8BD2D9.8050002@attbi.com \
    --to=ac9410@attbi.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.