All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org>
To: patmans@us.ibm.com
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, mdharm-scsi@one-eyed-alien.net,
	james.bottomley@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net, ronald@kuetemeier.com,
	dmitrik@users.sourceforge.net, idan@idanso.dyndns.org
Subject: Re: [usb-storage] Re: [PATCH] fix Sony USB mass storage - pass larger receive buffer
Date: 13 Nov 2003 11:15:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1068747355.16444.22.camel@patrh9> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031113100424.A26197@beaverton.ibm.com>

> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=106836761130746&w=2

Bingo!  Thank you.

> Showed the sequence:

Is this a CBI/CB trace?  That's not quite authentic Windows talk, as if
we had bInterfaceProtocol = x50 BBB with bInterfaceSubClass = x06
Transparent SCSI.  That's Windows opaquely filtered by the BCO
(binary-code-only) Windows CBI/CB driver.

> Showed the sequence:
> 
> 	INQUIRY length 0x24 (36) bytes
> 	READ CAPACITY
> 	TEST UNIT READY
> 	READ CAPACITY
> 	READ 10

Obsolete?

I see the comment says "win98".

I hear Win has two i/o traditions, binary incompatible.  I hear Win ME/
98SE/ etc. tries speech such as auto sense for x0E, whereas Win XP/2K
etc. tries such radically different speech as auto sense for x12.

When I choose to believe that rumour, I conclude Talk Like Massively
Distributed Consumer Windows in 2003 is Talk Like Win XP.

> Showed the sequence:
> 
> 	INQUIRY length 0x24 (36) bytes
> 	READ CAPACITY
> 	TEST UNIT READY
> 	READ CAPACITY
> 	READ 10

Did we omit auto sense from this trace?

I'm surprised to see no auto sense of unit attentions (x 6 29 Reset, x 6
28 GoneReady) early in life, after I see -i x24 -y "12 00:00:00 24 00"
// Inquiry report (!!(bytes[1] & x80 RMB)) i.e. disc removable without
removing drive.

Pat LaVarre



  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-13 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-12 23:50 [PATCH] fix Sony USB mass storage - pass larger receive buffer Patrick Mansfield
2003-11-13  0:09 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-13  0:13   ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-11-13  0:44     ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-11-13  1:56       ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-13 14:54         ` [usb-storage] " Alan Stern
2003-11-13 16:21           ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-13 17:09             ` Alan Stern
2003-11-13 17:24               ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-13 18:04                 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-11-13 18:15                   ` Pat LaVarre [this message]
2003-11-13 18:22                     ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-13 18:26                       ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-13 18:37                         ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-13 19:13                           ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-13 19:30                             ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-13 22:03                               ` Alan Stern
2003-11-13 23:40                                 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-13 23:51                                   ` Dmitri Katchalov
2003-11-14  0:16                                     ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  1:04                                   ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-14  1:10                                     ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  1:13                                       ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-13 22:01                 ` Alan Stern
2003-11-13 23:37                   ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  0:24                     ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-11-14  1:54                       ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  2:08                         ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-14  2:24                           ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-17 21:38                       ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-17 22:00                         ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-11-17 23:36                           ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  1:03                     ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-13 23:44                   ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  0:13                     ` Dmitri Katchalov
2003-11-14  0:55                       ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  1:13                       ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-14  2:02                         ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  2:10                       ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  2:19                         ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-14  2:38                           ` [usb-storage] mode sense blacklist how Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  2:44                             ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-14 17:27                               ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14 17:57                                 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  3:11                             ` Dmitri Katchalov
2003-11-14 19:41                               ` Pat LaVarre
     [not found]                                 ` <20031114153607.A7207@beaverton.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                   ` <20031116121039.A13224@beaverton.ibm.com>
2003-11-17 20:14                                     ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-19 12:55                                 ` Dmitri Katchalov
2003-11-19 16:34                                   ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-19 17:02                                   ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-19 23:34                                     ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-11-20 16:32                                       ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-21  1:17                                         ` SG_IO ioctl (was: mode sense blacklist how) Douglas Gilbert
2003-11-21  3:18                                           ` Willem Riede
2003-11-21 20:51                                           ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-28 17:07                                             ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-28 17:14                                               ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-28 17:31                                               ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-28 17:09                                             ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-21 21:29                                           ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-20 14:06                                     ` [usb-storage] mode sense blacklist how Dmitri Katchalov
2003-11-20 15:57                                       ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  1:06                     ` [usb-storage] Re: [PATCH] fix Sony USB mass storage - pass larger receive buffer Matthew Dharm
2003-11-14 16:14                     ` Alan Stern
2003-11-14 17:29                       ` Matthew Dharm
2003-11-14 17:50                       ` Pat LaVarre
2003-11-14  2:02 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-11-14 21:45   ` [usb-storage] " Pat LaVarre
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-14  2:25 Andries.Brouwer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1068747355.16444.22.camel@patrh9 \
    --to=p.lavarre@ieee.org \
    --cc=dmitrik@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=idan@idanso.dyndns.org \
    --cc=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdharm-scsi@one-eyed-alien.net \
    --cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ronald@kuetemeier.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.