All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>,
	Paul Jackson <pj-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>,
	"Martin J. Bligh"
	<mbligh-/CzTsIfkJEdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup ACPI numa warnings
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 21:52:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092027151.6496.13709.camel@nighthawk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092025184.2292.26.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 975 bytes --]

On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 21:19, Alex Williamson wrote:
>    Ok, I was all set to switch to static inlines, but it doesn't work.
> Compiling w/ debug on, _dbg is undefined, which is part of the
> ACPI_DB_INFO macro, but it only gets setup by the ACPI_FUNCTION_NAME
> macro.  Guess I got lucky by choosing to do it as a macro.  IMHO, it
> doesn't really make sense to make the static inline functions more
> complicated or hide where they're getting called to make this all work.
> So, I think the choices are to stick with the ugly macros or put #ifdefs
> around the code and essentially leave it the way it is.  Sorry I didn't
> give it a more thorough look when originally questioned.  Better ideas?
> Thanks,

That code is already pretty hideous, so perhaps my original question
doesn't have that much impact.  The attached patch at least uses inline
functions.  It still has the #ifdefs, but what else do you expect for
debugging code?  Is this a feasible approach?

-- Dave

[-- Attachment #2: ACPI-warnings-1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3876 bytes --]

Only in acpi-warnings/drivers/acpi/: .Kconfig.swp
diff -ru clean/drivers/acpi/numa.c acpi-warnings/drivers/acpi/numa.c
--- clean/drivers/acpi/numa.c	2004-06-15 22:19:44.000000000 -0700
+++ acpi-warnings/drivers/acpi/numa.c	2004-08-08 21:46:58.000000000 -0700
@@ -38,6 +38,33 @@
 
 extern int __init acpi_table_parse_madt_family (enum acpi_table_id id, unsigned long madt_size, int entry_id, acpi_madt_entry_handler handler, unsigned int max_entries);
 
+#ifdef ACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT
+static inline void acpi_print_srat_processor_affinity(struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *p)
+{
+	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "SRAT Processor (id[0x%02x] "
+			"eid[0x%02x]) in proximity domain %d %s\n",
+	                 p->apic_id, p->lsapic_eid, p->proximity_domain,
+	                 p->flags.enabled?"enabled":"disabled")); }
+}
+
+static inline void acpi_print_srat_memory_affinity(struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *p)
+{
+	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "SRAT Memory (0x%08x%08x length "
+	                 "0x%08x%08x type 0x%x) in proximity domain %d %s%s\n",
+	                 p->base_addr_hi, p->base_addr_lo, p->length_hi,
+	                 p->length_lo, p->memory_type, p->proximity_domain,
+	                 p->flags.enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled",
+	                 p->flags.hot_pluggable ? " hot-pluggable" : "")); }
+}
+#else
+static inline void acpi_print_srat_memory_affinity(acpi_table_entry_header *header) {}
+static inline void acpi_print_srat_processor_affinity(acpi_table_entry_header *header) {}
+#endif
+
+#define BAD_SRAT_ENTRY(entry, end) ( \
+	(!entry) || (unsigned long)entry + sizeof(*entry) > end ||  \
+	((acpi_table_entry_header *)entry)->length != sizeof(*entry))
+
 void __init
 acpi_table_print_srat_entry (
 	acpi_table_entry_header	*header)
@@ -51,27 +78,11 @@
 	switch (header->type) {
 
 	case ACPI_SRAT_PROCESSOR_AFFINITY:
-	{
-		struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *p =
-			(struct acpi_table_processor_affinity*) header;
-		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "SRAT Processor (id[0x%02x] eid[0x%02x]) in proximity domain %d %s\n",
-		       p->apic_id, p->lsapic_eid, p->proximity_domain,
-		       p->flags.enabled?"enabled":"disabled"));
-	}
+		acpi_print_srat_processor_affinity((struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *)header);
 		break;
-
 	case ACPI_SRAT_MEMORY_AFFINITY:
-	{
-		struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *p =
-			(struct acpi_table_memory_affinity*) header;
-		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "SRAT Memory (0x%08x%08x length 0x%08x%08x type 0x%x) in proximity domain %d %s%s\n",
-		       p->base_addr_hi, p->base_addr_lo, p->length_hi, p->length_lo,
-		       p->memory_type, p->proximity_domain,
-		       p->flags.enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled",
-		       p->flags.hot_pluggable ? " hot-pluggable" : ""));
-	}
+		acpi_print_srat_memory_affinity((struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *)header);
 		break;
-
 	default:
 		printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "Found unsupported SRAT entry (type = 0x%x)\n",
 			header->type);
@@ -103,12 +114,12 @@
 
 
 static int __init
-acpi_parse_processor_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header)
+acpi_parse_processor_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header, unsigned long size)
 {
 	struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *processor_affinity;
 
 	processor_affinity = (struct acpi_table_processor_affinity*) header;
-	if (!processor_affinity)
+	if (BAD_SRAT_ENTRY(processor_affinity, size))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	acpi_table_print_srat_entry(header);
@@ -121,12 +132,12 @@
 
 
 static int __init
-acpi_parse_memory_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header)
+acpi_parse_memory_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header, unsigned long size)
 {
 	struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *memory_affinity;
 
 	memory_affinity = (struct acpi_table_memory_affinity*) header;
-	if (!memory_affinity)
+	if (BAD_SRAT_ENTRY(memory_affinity, size))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	acpi_table_print_srat_entry(header);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup ACPI numa warnings
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 21:52:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092027151.6496.13709.camel@nighthawk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092025184.2292.26.camel@localhost.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 975 bytes --]

On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 21:19, Alex Williamson wrote:
>    Ok, I was all set to switch to static inlines, but it doesn't work.
> Compiling w/ debug on, _dbg is undefined, which is part of the
> ACPI_DB_INFO macro, but it only gets setup by the ACPI_FUNCTION_NAME
> macro.  Guess I got lucky by choosing to do it as a macro.  IMHO, it
> doesn't really make sense to make the static inline functions more
> complicated or hide where they're getting called to make this all work.
> So, I think the choices are to stick with the ugly macros or put #ifdefs
> around the code and essentially leave it the way it is.  Sorry I didn't
> give it a more thorough look when originally questioned.  Better ideas?
> Thanks,

That code is already pretty hideous, so perhaps my original question
doesn't have that much impact.  The attached patch at least uses inline
functions.  It still has the #ifdefs, but what else do you expect for
debugging code?  Is this a feasible approach?

-- Dave

[-- Attachment #2: ACPI-warnings-1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3876 bytes --]

Only in acpi-warnings/drivers/acpi/: .Kconfig.swp
diff -ru clean/drivers/acpi/numa.c acpi-warnings/drivers/acpi/numa.c
--- clean/drivers/acpi/numa.c	2004-06-15 22:19:44.000000000 -0700
+++ acpi-warnings/drivers/acpi/numa.c	2004-08-08 21:46:58.000000000 -0700
@@ -38,6 +38,33 @@
 
 extern int __init acpi_table_parse_madt_family (enum acpi_table_id id, unsigned long madt_size, int entry_id, acpi_madt_entry_handler handler, unsigned int max_entries);
 
+#ifdef ACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT
+static inline void acpi_print_srat_processor_affinity(struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *p)
+{
+	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "SRAT Processor (id[0x%02x] "
+			"eid[0x%02x]) in proximity domain %d %s\n",
+	                 p->apic_id, p->lsapic_eid, p->proximity_domain,
+	                 p->flags.enabled?"enabled":"disabled")); }
+}
+
+static inline void acpi_print_srat_memory_affinity(struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *p)
+{
+	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "SRAT Memory (0x%08x%08x length "
+	                 "0x%08x%08x type 0x%x) in proximity domain %d %s%s\n",
+	                 p->base_addr_hi, p->base_addr_lo, p->length_hi,
+	                 p->length_lo, p->memory_type, p->proximity_domain,
+	                 p->flags.enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled",
+	                 p->flags.hot_pluggable ? " hot-pluggable" : "")); }
+}
+#else
+static inline void acpi_print_srat_memory_affinity(acpi_table_entry_header *header) {}
+static inline void acpi_print_srat_processor_affinity(acpi_table_entry_header *header) {}
+#endif
+
+#define BAD_SRAT_ENTRY(entry, end) ( \
+	(!entry) || (unsigned long)entry + sizeof(*entry) > end ||  \
+	((acpi_table_entry_header *)entry)->length != sizeof(*entry))
+
 void __init
 acpi_table_print_srat_entry (
 	acpi_table_entry_header	*header)
@@ -51,27 +78,11 @@
 	switch (header->type) {
 
 	case ACPI_SRAT_PROCESSOR_AFFINITY:
-	{
-		struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *p =
-			(struct acpi_table_processor_affinity*) header;
-		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "SRAT Processor (id[0x%02x] eid[0x%02x]) in proximity domain %d %s\n",
-		       p->apic_id, p->lsapic_eid, p->proximity_domain,
-		       p->flags.enabled?"enabled":"disabled"));
-	}
+		acpi_print_srat_processor_affinity((struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *)header);
 		break;
-
 	case ACPI_SRAT_MEMORY_AFFINITY:
-	{
-		struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *p =
-			(struct acpi_table_memory_affinity*) header;
-		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "SRAT Memory (0x%08x%08x length 0x%08x%08x type 0x%x) in proximity domain %d %s%s\n",
-		       p->base_addr_hi, p->base_addr_lo, p->length_hi, p->length_lo,
-		       p->memory_type, p->proximity_domain,
-		       p->flags.enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled",
-		       p->flags.hot_pluggable ? " hot-pluggable" : ""));
-	}
+		acpi_print_srat_memory_affinity((struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *)header);
 		break;
-
 	default:
 		printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "Found unsupported SRAT entry (type = 0x%x)\n",
 			header->type);
@@ -103,12 +114,12 @@
 
 
 static int __init
-acpi_parse_processor_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header)
+acpi_parse_processor_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header, unsigned long size)
 {
 	struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *processor_affinity;
 
 	processor_affinity = (struct acpi_table_processor_affinity*) header;
-	if (!processor_affinity)
+	if (BAD_SRAT_ENTRY(processor_affinity, size))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	acpi_table_print_srat_entry(header);
@@ -121,12 +132,12 @@
 
 
 static int __init
-acpi_parse_memory_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header)
+acpi_parse_memory_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header, unsigned long size)
 {
 	struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *memory_affinity;
 
 	memory_affinity = (struct acpi_table_memory_affinity*) header;
-	if (!memory_affinity)
+	if (BAD_SRAT_ENTRY(memory_affinity, size))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	acpi_table_print_srat_entry(header);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-09  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-05 20:46 [PATCH] cleanup ACPI numa warnings Alex Williamson
2004-08-05 21:01 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-05 21:01   ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-05 21:25   ` Alex Williamson
2004-08-05 21:25     ` Alex Williamson
2004-08-06  3:35     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-06  3:50       ` [ACPI] " Randy.Dunlap
     [not found]         ` <20040805205059.3fb67b71.rddunlap-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>
2004-08-07 17:57           ` Paul Jackson
2004-08-07 17:57             ` [ACPI] " Paul Jackson
2004-08-08 21:36             ` Randy.Dunlap
     [not found]               ` <20040808143631.7c18cae9.rddunlap-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>
2004-08-09  2:53                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-09  2:53                   ` [ACPI] " Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-20 18:55                   ` Alex Williamson
2004-08-20 18:55                     ` [ACPI] " Alex Williamson
2004-08-20 19:22                     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-09  4:19               ` Alex Williamson
     [not found]                 ` <1092025184.2292.26.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2004-08-09  4:52                   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2004-08-09  4:52                     ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-09  5:10                     ` Alex Williamson
     [not found]                       ` <1092028238.2211.5.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2004-08-09  5:44                         ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-09  5:44                           ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1092027151.6496.13709.camel@nighthawk \
    --to=haveblue-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mbligh-/CzTsIfkJEdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pj-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rddunlap-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.