From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>,
pj@sgi.com, SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
mdr@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, jeremy@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com,
djh@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: I/O write ordering
Date: 22 Sep 2004 10:47:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095864485.2143.1.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040922143208.GL16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 10:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I think the only disagreement is whether we have it implicit or explicit.
> I see three potential solutions:
>
> 1. iomb() [we have mb(), rmb(), wmb() already. Does mb() imply iomb()?
> Vice versa?]
> 2. io_spin_unlock() which is an io barrier as well as a memory barrier.
> 3. Make spin_unlock an io barrier. Expensive.
>
> I'd quite like to hear opinions from the PPC and Alpha people, they seem to
> be the most out-of-order architectures.
I favour 1. iomb; I think, since I/O barriers can be either heavyweight
or non-existent depending on the architecture, iomb() should imply mb()
but not vice versa.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-22 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <B179AE41C1147041AA1121F44614F0B060EF48@AVEXCH02.qlogic.org>
[not found] ` <20040916121235.5e4f9c32.pj@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <1095362263.16326.12.camel@praka>
2004-09-16 19:56 ` SCSI QLA not working on latest *-mm SN2 Paul Jackson
2004-09-16 20:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 20:56 ` Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-16 21:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 21:40 ` Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-16 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-16 22:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-17 17:21 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-18 6:10 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-18 17:57 ` Documentation/io_ordering.txt is wrong Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-20 23:39 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 0:38 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-20 22:40 ` SCSI QLA not working on latest *-mm SN2 Jesse Barnes
2004-09-20 23:27 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-21 0:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 5:46 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-21 6:45 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 13:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 13:25 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 15:13 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 15:41 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 15:58 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 16:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-21 16:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 16:11 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 16:18 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 16:24 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 17:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 17:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-21 17:24 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 17:20 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 17:46 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 17:56 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-21 18:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 19:06 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-21 19:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-21 22:44 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-21 21:03 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 21:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-21 21:43 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-21 22:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-22 0:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-22 1:16 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-22 1:44 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-22 2:58 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-22 14:32 ` I/O write ordering Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-22 14:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-22 14:50 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-22 14:47 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-09-22 14:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-22 15:11 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-22 15:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-22 15:22 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-22 15:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-22 15:43 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-23 0:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-23 1:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-23 3:01 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-23 3:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-23 4:26 ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-21 23:03 ` SCSI QLA not working on latest *-mm SN2 Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-09-16 23:14 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-16 20:11 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1095864485.2143.1.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=djh@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=jeremy@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mdr@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.