From: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru (Evgeniy Polyakov)
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: drivers/w1/: why is dscore.c not ds9490r.c ?
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:25:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1101143109.9784.9.camel@uganda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041122165145.GH19419@stusta.de>
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 17:51 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 07:25:45PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:33 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:31:12AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > Hi Evgeniy,
> > > >
> > > > Hello, Adrian.
> > >
> > > Hi Evgeniy,
> > >
> > > > > drivers/w1/Makefile in recent 2.6 kernels contains:
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_W1_DS9490) += ds9490r.o
> > > > > ds9490r-objs := dscore.o
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a reason, why dscore.c isn't simply named ds9490r.c ?
> > > >
> > > > dscore.c is a core function set to work with ds2490 chip.
> > > > ds9490* is built on top of it.
> > > > Any vendor can create it's own w1 bus master using this chip,
> > > > not ds9490.
> > >
> > > if it was built on top of it, I'd have expected ds9490r.o to contain
> > > additional object files.
> >
> > DS9490 does not have anything except this chip and simple 64bit memory
> > chip,
> > so it is not needed to have any additional code.
> >
> > > How would a different w1 bus master chip look like in
> > > drivers/w1/Makefile?
> >
> > obj-m: proprietary_module.o
> > proprietary_module-objs: dscore.o proprietary_module_init.o
> >
> > Actually it will live outside the kernel tree, but will require ds2490
> > driver.
> > It could be called ds2490.c but I think dscore is better name.
>
> Why are you talking about proprietary modules living outside the kernel
> tree?
>
> The only interesting case is the one of modules shipped with the kernel.
> And for them, this will break at link time if two such modules are
> included statically into the kernel.
If we _currently_ do not have any open hw/module that depends on ds2490
core then it does not
mean that tomorrow noone will add it.
> cu
> Adrian
>
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20041122/ff26b67b/attachment.bin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drivers/w1/: why is dscore.c not ds9490r.c ?
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:05:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1101143109.9784.9.camel@uganda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041122165145.GH19419@stusta.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1935 bytes --]
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 17:51 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 07:25:45PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:33 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:31:12AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > Hi Evgeniy,
> > > >
> > > > Hello, Adrian.
> > >
> > > Hi Evgeniy,
> > >
> > > > > drivers/w1/Makefile in recent 2.6 kernels contains:
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_W1_DS9490) += ds9490r.o
> > > > > ds9490r-objs := dscore.o
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a reason, why dscore.c isn't simply named ds9490r.c ?
> > > >
> > > > dscore.c is a core function set to work with ds2490 chip.
> > > > ds9490* is built on top of it.
> > > > Any vendor can create it's own w1 bus master using this chip,
> > > > not ds9490.
> > >
> > > if it was built on top of it, I'd have expected ds9490r.o to contain
> > > additional object files.
> >
> > DS9490 does not have anything except this chip and simple 64bit memory
> > chip,
> > so it is not needed to have any additional code.
> >
> > > How would a different w1 bus master chip look like in
> > > drivers/w1/Makefile?
> >
> > obj-m: proprietary_module.o
> > proprietary_module-objs: dscore.o proprietary_module_init.o
> >
> > Actually it will live outside the kernel tree, but will require ds2490
> > driver.
> > It could be called ds2490.c but I think dscore is better name.
>
> Why are you talking about proprietary modules living outside the kernel
> tree?
>
> The only interesting case is the one of modules shipped with the kernel.
> And for them, this will break at link time if two such modules are
> included statically into the kernel.
If we _currently_ do not have any open hw/module that depends on ds2490
core then it does not
mean that tomorrow noone will add it.
> cu
> Adrian
>
--
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-21 22:02 drivers/w1/: why is dscore.c not ds9490r.c ? Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 7:31 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-22 13:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 16:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-22 16:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 17:05 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-22 17:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 17:37 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-23 0:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-23 10:34 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-25 15:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-29 1:52 ` [2.6 patch] drivers/w1/: possible cleanups Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-29 5:12 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-17 23:31 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-19 14:26 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19 6:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1101143109.9784.9.camel@uganda \
--to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.