All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bunk@stusta.de (Adrian Bunk)
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: drivers/w1/: why is dscore.c not ds9490r.c ?
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:25:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041122133344.GA19419@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1101108672.2843.55.camel@uganda>

On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:31:12AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Hi Evgeniy,
> 
> Hello, Adrian.

Hi Evgeniy,

> > drivers/w1/Makefile in recent 2.6 kernels contains:
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_W1_DS9490)         += ds9490r.o 
> >   ds9490r-objs    := dscore.o
> > 
> > Is there a reason, why dscore.c isn't simply named ds9490r.c ?
> 
> dscore.c is a core function set to work with ds2490 chip.
> ds9490* is built on top of it.
> Any vendor can create it's own w1 bus master using this chip, 
> not ds9490.

if it was built on top of it, I'd have expected ds9490r.o to contain 
additional object files.

How would a different w1 bus master chip look like in 
drivers/w1/Makefile?

> 	Evgeniy Polyakov

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drivers/w1/: why is dscore.c not ds9490r.c ?
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:33:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041122133344.GA19419@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1101108672.2843.55.camel@uganda>

On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:31:12AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Hi Evgeniy,
> 
> Hello, Adrian.

Hi Evgeniy,

> > drivers/w1/Makefile in recent 2.6 kernels contains:
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_W1_DS9490)         += ds9490r.o 
> >   ds9490r-objs    := dscore.o
> > 
> > Is there a reason, why dscore.c isn't simply named ds9490r.c ?
> 
> dscore.c is a core function set to work with ds2490 chip.
> ds9490* is built on top of it.
> Any vendor can create it's own w1 bus master using this chip, 
> not ds9490.

if it was built on top of it, I'd have expected ds9490r.o to contain 
additional object files.

How would a different w1 bus master chip look like in 
drivers/w1/Makefile?

> 	Evgeniy Polyakov

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-19  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-21 22:02 drivers/w1/: why is dscore.c not ds9490r.c ? Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19  6:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22  7:31 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19  6:25   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-22 13:33   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-05-19  6:25     ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 16:25     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19  6:25       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-22 16:51       ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19  6:25         ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 17:05         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19  6:25           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-22 17:19           ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19  6:25             ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 17:37             ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19  6:25               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-23  0:20               ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19  6:25                 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-23 10:34                 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19  6:25                   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-25 15:56                   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19  6:25                     ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-29  1:52                     ` [2.6 patch] drivers/w1/: possible cleanups Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19  6:25                       ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-29  5:12                       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19  6:25                         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-17 23:31 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19  6:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-19 14:26 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-05-19  6:25   ` Evgeniy Polyakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041122133344.GA19419@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.