All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	miklos@szeredi.hu, neilb@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com,
	tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com, nikita@clusterfs.com,
	trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, yingchao.zhou@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm: count reclaimable pages per BDI
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:04:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177153464.2934.39.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070421025521.8d77072e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 02:55 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:52:01 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> 
> > Count per BDI reclaimable pages; nr_reclaimable = nr_dirty + nr_unstable.
> 
> hm.  Aggregating dirty and unstable at inc/dec time is a bit kludgy.  If
> later on we want to know just "dirty" then we're in trouble.
> 
> I can see the logic behind it though.
> 
> Perhaps one could have separate BDI_DIRTY and BDI_UNSTABLE and treat them
> separately at inc/dec time, but give them the same numerical value, so
> they in fact refer to the same counter.  That's kludgy too.

:-(

I struggled with it too; don't have a ready solution either. I'll do
whatever the consensus agrees upon.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	miklos@szeredi.hu, neilb@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com,
	tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com, nikita@clusterfs.com,
	trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, yingchao.zhou@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm: count reclaimable pages per BDI
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:04:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177153464.2934.39.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070421025521.8d77072e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 02:55 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:52:01 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> 
> > Count per BDI reclaimable pages; nr_reclaimable = nr_dirty + nr_unstable.
> 
> hm.  Aggregating dirty and unstable at inc/dec time is a bit kludgy.  If
> later on we want to know just "dirty" then we're in trouble.
> 
> I can see the logic behind it though.
> 
> Perhaps one could have separate BDI_DIRTY and BDI_UNSTABLE and treat them
> separately at inc/dec time, but give them the same numerical value, so
> they in fact refer to the same counter.  That's kludgy too.

:-(

I struggled with it too; don't have a ready solution either. I'll do
whatever the consensus agrees upon.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-21 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-20 15:51 [PATCH 00/10] per device dirty throttling -v5 Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51 ` [PATCH 01/10] revert per-backing_dev-dirty-and-writeback-page-accounting Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51 ` [PATCH 02/10] nfs: remove congestion_end() Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] lib: dampen the percpu_counter FBC_BATCH Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21  9:55   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21  9:55     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 10:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 10:58       ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51 ` [PATCH 04/10] lib: percpu_counter_mod64 Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21  9:55   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21  9:55     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 11:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 11:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 19:21       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 19:21         ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 19:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 19:30           ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: bdi init hooks Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:52 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: scalable bdi statistics counters Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:52 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: count reclaimable pages per BDI Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21  9:55   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21  9:55     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 11:04     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-04-21 11:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:52 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: count writeback " Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21  9:55   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21  9:55     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 11:07     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 11:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-22  7:19       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-22  7:19         ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-22  9:08         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-22  9:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:52 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: expose BDI statistics in sysfs Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21  9:55   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21  9:55     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 11:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 11:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:52 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: per device dirty threshold Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-20 15:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21  9:55   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21  9:55     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 10:38     ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-21 10:38       ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-21 10:54       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 10:54         ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 20:25         ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-21 20:25           ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-23  6:14           ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-23  6:14             ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-23  6:29             ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-23  6:29               ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-23  6:39               ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23  6:39                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 12:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 12:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 12:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 12:15         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 19:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-21 19:50           ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-23 15:48         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 15:48           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 15:58           ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-23 15:58             ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-23 16:08             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 16:08               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-22  7:26       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-22  7:26         ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24  2:58   ` Neil Brown
2007-04-24  2:58     ` Neil Brown
2007-04-24  7:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-24  7:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-24  8:19       ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24  8:19         ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24  8:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-24  8:31           ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-24  9:14           ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24  9:14             ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24  9:26             ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-24  9:26               ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-24  9:47               ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24  9:47                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24 10:00                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 10:00                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 10:12                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-24 10:12                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-24 10:19                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24 10:19                       ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24 10:24                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-24 10:24                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-04-24 10:40                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 10:40                       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 11:22                       ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24 11:22                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24 11:50                         ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 11:50                           ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 12:07                           ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-24 12:07                             ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-22  9:57 ` [PATCH 00/10] per device dirty throttling -v5 Andrew Morton
2007-04-22  9:57   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1177153464.2934.39.camel@lappy \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=nikita@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=yingchao.zhou@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.