All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] net: Add __napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:52:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192657952.6783.40.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071017083107.6a1b1bd3@freepuppy.rosehill>


On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 08:31 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Please don't use double underscore, for this function name. There is no
> reason to not make it a normal API call.
> 
> The sky2 fix I am working on will use napi_synchronize as well.

Allright. A compiler barrier in the !SMP case makes sense, but I would
still want an smp_mb() before the test_bit. I think it's a bug in
synchronize_irq not to have it.

Cheers,
Ben.
 
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-16 16:48:20.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-17 08:29:55.000000000 -0700
> @@ -407,6 +407,24 @@ static inline void napi_enable(struct na
>  	clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +/**
> + *	napi_synchronize - wait until NAPI is not running
> + *	@n: napi context
> + *
> + * Wait until NAPI is done being scheduled on this context.
> + * Any outstanding processing completes but
> + * does not disable future activations.
> + */
> +static inline void napi_synchronize(const struct napi_struct *n)
> +{
> +	while (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state))
> +		msleep(1);
> +}
> +#else
> +# define napi_synchronize(n)	barrier()
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   *	The DEVICE structure.
>   *	Actually, this whole structure is a big mistake.  It mixes I/O

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-17 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-16  5:49 [PATCH/RFC] net: Add __napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  5:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  6:06 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-16  6:06   ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-16  7:37   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  7:37     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  7:44     ` David Miller
2007-10-16  7:44       ` David Miller
2007-10-16 18:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-16 18:53   ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-16 21:14   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16 21:14     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  2:50   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  2:50     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  2:52   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  2:52     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  3:16     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-17  3:16       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-17  3:24       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  3:24         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 15:31         ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-17 15:31           ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-17 21:52           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-10-17 22:04           ` [PATCH] net: Add napi_sycnhronize() " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 22:04             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 23:36             ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-17 23:36               ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-17 23:59               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 23:59                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  1:02             ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-18  1:02               ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-18  1:26               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  1:26                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  1:19             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  1:19               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 23:14           ` [PATCH] fix EMAC driver for proper napi_synchronize API Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 23:14             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  0:21             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-18  0:21               ` Jeff Garzik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-16  5:40 [PATCH/RFC] net: Add __napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  5:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1192657952.6783.40.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.