All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:02:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192669323.13993.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1192658654.6783.43.camel@pasglop>

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 08:04 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> net: Add __napi_synchronize() to sync with napi poll
> 
> The EMAC driver which needs to handle multiple devices with one
> NAPI instance implements its own per-channel disable bit. However,
> when setting such a bit, it needs to synchronize with the poller
> (that is make sure that any pending poller instance has completed,
> or is started late enough to see that disable bit).
> 
> This implements a low level __napi_synchronize() function to acheive
> that. The underscores are to emphasis the low level aspect of it and
> to discourage driver writers who don't know what they are doing to
> use it (to please DaveM :-)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

Ok, trying again, leaving the actual patch below.  In the above patch
description, you still call it __napi_synchronize.  In the patch below,
it's napi_syncronize.

I was just trying to point out to whomever commits this patch that the
actual description should probably be fixed.

> ---
> 
> Back to msleep() since it fits my need well and that's what
> you used as well. Note that the smp_mb() will turn into barrier()
> on non-SMP.
> 
> I'll send a separate patch to fix EMAC to use the non __ version.
> 
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/netdevice.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-17 13:31:32.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-18 08:01:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -394,6 +394,23 @@ static inline void napi_disable(struct n
>  }
> 
>  /**
> + *	napi_synchronize - synchronize with a concurrent poll
> + *	@n: napi context
> + *
> + * Synchronizes with a concurrent poll. Not to be used in normal
> + * drivers, mostly useful if you end up with multiple interfaces
> + * on one NAPI instance. This must be called from task context.
> + */
> +static inline void napi_synchronize(struct napi_struct *n)
> +{
> +	smp_mb();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +	while (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state))
> +		msleep(1);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   *	napi_enable - enable NAPI scheduling
>   *	@n: napi context
>   *
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:02:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192669323.13993.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1192658654.6783.43.camel@pasglop>

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 08:04 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> net: Add __napi_synchronize() to sync with napi poll
> 
> The EMAC driver which needs to handle multiple devices with one
> NAPI instance implements its own per-channel disable bit. However,
> when setting such a bit, it needs to synchronize with the poller
> (that is make sure that any pending poller instance has completed,
> or is started late enough to see that disable bit).
> 
> This implements a low level __napi_synchronize() function to acheive
> that. The underscores are to emphasis the low level aspect of it and
> to discourage driver writers who don't know what they are doing to
> use it (to please DaveM :-)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

Ok, trying again, leaving the actual patch below.  In the above patch
description, you still call it __napi_synchronize.  In the patch below,
it's napi_syncronize.

I was just trying to point out to whomever commits this patch that the
actual description should probably be fixed.

> ---
> 
> Back to msleep() since it fits my need well and that's what
> you used as well. Note that the smp_mb() will turn into barrier()
> on non-SMP.
> 
> I'll send a separate patch to fix EMAC to use the non __ version.
> 
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/netdevice.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-17 13:31:32.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-18 08:01:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -394,6 +394,23 @@ static inline void napi_disable(struct n
>  }
> 
>  /**
> + *	napi_synchronize - synchronize with a concurrent poll
> + *	@n: napi context
> + *
> + * Synchronizes with a concurrent poll. Not to be used in normal
> + * drivers, mostly useful if you end up with multiple interfaces
> + * on one NAPI instance. This must be called from task context.
> + */
> +static inline void napi_synchronize(struct napi_struct *n)
> +{
> +	smp_mb();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +	while (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state))
> +		msleep(1);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   *	napi_enable - enable NAPI scheduling
>   *	@n: napi context
>   *
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-18  1:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-16  5:49 [PATCH/RFC] net: Add __napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  5:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  6:06 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-16  6:06   ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-16  7:37   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  7:37     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  7:44     ` David Miller
2007-10-16  7:44       ` David Miller
2007-10-16 18:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-16 18:53   ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-16 21:14   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16 21:14     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  2:50   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  2:50     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  2:52   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  2:52     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  3:16     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-17  3:16       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-17  3:24       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  3:24         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 15:31         ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-17 15:31           ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-17 21:52           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 22:04           ` [PATCH] net: Add napi_sycnhronize() " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 22:04             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 23:36             ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-17 23:36               ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-17 23:59               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 23:59                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  1:02             ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2007-10-18  1:02               ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-18  1:26               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  1:26                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  1:19             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  1:19               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 23:14           ` [PATCH] fix EMAC driver for proper napi_synchronize API Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 23:14             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  0:21             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-18  0:21               ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1192669323.13993.33.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.