* [lm-sensors] Winbond W83L786G support
@ 2007-11-28 16:04 Sagar Borikar
2007-11-29 8:51 ` Jean Delvare
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sagar Borikar @ 2007-11-28 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 376 bytes --]
All,
I am using Winbond W83L786NG chip in my box and I wanted to test it using lm-sensors. I could find the driver patch for this chipe supported in 2.6.23-rc4 onwards. But couldn't find the corresponding code in lm-sensors. Even lm-sensors-3.0.0 is not having chip specific code.Can anyone tell me how this monitor can be tested?
Thanks in advance.
Sagar
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 901 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] Winbond W83L786G support
2007-11-28 16:04 [lm-sensors] Winbond W83L786G support Sagar Borikar
@ 2007-11-29 8:51 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-30 18:02 ` Sagar Borikar
2007-12-01 9:01 ` Kevin Lo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2007-11-29 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Sagar,
On 28 Nov 2007 16:04:54 -0000, Sagar Borikar wrote:
> I am using Winbond W83L786NG chip in my box and I wanted to test
> it using lm-sensors. I could find the driver patch for this chipe
> supported in 2.6.23-rc4 onwards. But couldn't find the corresponding
> code in lm-sensors. Even lm-sensors-3.0.0 is not having chip
> specific code.Can anyone tell me how this monitor can be tested?
Please read this thread:
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-November/022032.html
lm-sensors 3.0.0 doesn't need have any chip-specific code, so it's no
surprise that you didn't find any W83L786NG-specific code there. It's
per design, now that the sysfs interface is fully standardized. So
please give a try to lm-sensors 3.0.0, it should work. If it doesn't,
please report.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] Winbond W83L786G support
2007-11-28 16:04 [lm-sensors] Winbond W83L786G support Sagar Borikar
2007-11-29 8:51 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2007-11-30 18:02 ` Sagar Borikar
2007-12-01 9:01 ` Kevin Lo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sagar Borikar @ 2007-11-30 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 982 bytes --]
Hi Jean,
We tested it with 3.0.0 and it worked fine. Thanks
- Sagar
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 Jean Delvare wrote :
>Hi Sagar,
>
>On 28 Nov 2007 16:04:54 -0000, Sagar Borikar wrote:
> > I am using Winbond W83L786NG chip in my box and I wanted to test
> > it using lm-sensors. I could find the driver patch for this chipe
> > supported in 2.6.23-rc4 onwards. But couldn't find the corresponding
> > code in lm-sensors. Even lm-sensors-3.0.0 is not having chip
> > specific code.Can anyone tell me how this monitor can be tested?
>
>Please read this thread:
>http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-November/022032.html
>
>lm-sensors 3.0.0 doesn't need have any chip-specific code, so it's no
>surprise that you didn't find any W83L786NG-specific code there. It's
>per design, now that the sysfs interface is fully standardized. So
>please give a try to lm-sensors 3.0.0, it should work. If it doesn't,
>please report.
>
>--
>Jean Delvare
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1657 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] Winbond W83L786G support
2007-11-28 16:04 [lm-sensors] Winbond W83L786G support Sagar Borikar
2007-11-29 8:51 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-30 18:02 ` Sagar Borikar
@ 2007-12-01 9:01 ` Kevin Lo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Lo @ 2007-12-01 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 18:02 +0000, Sagar Borikar wrote:
>
> Hi Jean,
>
> We tested it with 3.0.0 and it worked fine. Thanks
Hi Sagar,
I'm glade to hear that :-) Thanks for testing.
> - Sagar
Kevin
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-01 9:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-28 16:04 [lm-sensors] Winbond W83L786G support Sagar Borikar
2007-11-29 8:51 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-30 18:02 ` Sagar Borikar
2007-12-01 9:01 ` Kevin Lo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.