From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
paulus@samba.org, ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:23:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244816582.7172.175.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090612141118.GK32105@elte.hu>
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 16:11 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Maybe. But maybe it's representative... so far in this merge
> > window, 100% of the powerpc build and runtime breakage upstream
> > comes from stuff that didn't get into -next before.
>
> But that's axiomatic, isnt it? linux-next build-tests PowerPC as the
> first in the row of tests - so no change that was in linux-next can
> ever cause a build failure on PowerPC, right?
I'd have to check with Stephen but I think linux-next tests a whole
bunch of archs each round. Anyway, the idea is, just don't get things
upstream before the at least had a chance to go through that little bit
of integration testing .. Is it -that- hard ?
Oh and before you ask me, yes, I do the same mistakes, and I have been
caught too merging things at the last minute that ended up broken and
that could have been caught by -next... I'm just trying to advocate the
idea that we all try to improve in that area :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
paulus@samba.org, Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:23:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244816582.7172.175.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090612141118.GK32105@elte.hu>
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 16:11 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Maybe. But maybe it's representative... so far in this merge
> > window, 100% of the powerpc build and runtime breakage upstream
> > comes from stuff that didn't get into -next before.
>
> But that's axiomatic, isnt it? linux-next build-tests PowerPC as the
> first in the row of tests - so no change that was in linux-next can
> ever cause a build failure on PowerPC, right?
I'd have to check with Stephen but I think linux-next tests a whole
bunch of archs each round. Anyway, the idea is, just don't get things
upstream before the at least had a chance to go through that little bit
of integration testing .. Is it -that- hard ?
Oh and before you ask me, yes, I do the same mistakes, and I have been
caught too merging things at the last minute that ended up broken and
that could have been caught by -next... I'm just trying to advocate the
idea that we all try to improve in that area :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-12 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 153+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 0:24 linux-next: origin tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-12 0:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-12 0:53 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-06-12 0:53 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-06-12 1:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 1:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 9:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 9:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-12 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-12 9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 9:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 9:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 12:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 12:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 13:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 13:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 13:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 13:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 14:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 14:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 14:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 14:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 14:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-06-12 14:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-13 5:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-13 5:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-13 5:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-12 13:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 13:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 13:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 13:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 14:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 14:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 14:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 14:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-13 4:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-13 4:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-12 1:14 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-12 1:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-12 2:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-12 2:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-13 0:14 ` Phillip Lougher
2010-01-13 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11 23:58 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11 23:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11 23:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-12 0:29 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-01-12 0:29 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-01-12 12:38 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-01-12 12:38 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-12-24 0:54 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-15 5:41 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-15 5:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-15 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-15 13:01 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2009-12-15 13:01 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2009-12-15 14:53 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-15 17:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-12-15 22:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-15 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 23:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-16 9:30 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-12-09 23:57 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-30 23:10 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12 0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-09 7:50 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-09 0:28 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-25 1:13 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-25 3:24 ` Baruch Siach
2009-06-25 4:12 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-23 6:22 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-23 10:13 ` Mark Brown
2009-06-19 6:30 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-19 6:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-12 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-14 7:34 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-14 7:58 ` Jesper Nilsson
2009-04-14 4:43 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-14 8:57 ` David Miller
2009-04-14 9:20 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-04-14 9:08 ` David Miller
2009-04-14 10:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-08 3:28 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-08 0:10 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-30 0:55 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-11 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-11 23:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-12 0:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-12 0:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-12 0:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-12 0:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-12 0:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-12 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 9:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-12 9:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-12 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13 16:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-13 16:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-12 9:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-01-12 9:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-01-12 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-11 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-11 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 0:43 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 3:36 ` Roland Dreier
2008-12-29 3:44 ` Roland Dreier
2008-12-29 9:58 ` Aleksey Senin
2008-12-29 16:13 ` Roland Dreier
2008-12-29 16:52 ` Aleksey Senin
2008-12-29 20:18 ` Roland Dreier
2008-12-29 21:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-29 21:35 ` Roland Dreier
2008-12-29 8:48 ` Aleksey Senin
2008-12-30 7:38 ` Roland Dreier
2008-12-30 8:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 0:00 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 0:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-28 23:51 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-28 23:38 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-28 23:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 0:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-16 0:35 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-16 4:57 ` David Miller
2008-10-16 0:31 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-16 12:58 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-10-14 22:59 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-14 23:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-14 23:52 ` David Miller
2008-10-15 0:05 ` Mark Brown
2008-10-15 0:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-14 23:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-15 9:02 ` Alan Cox
2008-10-15 9:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-15 11:01 ` Mark Brown
2008-08-26 0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-18 0:01 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-18 12:55 ` David Howells
2008-08-18 14:03 ` James Morris
2008-07-25 0:30 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-25 0:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244816582.7172.175.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.