From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>,
Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/06] Fix compilation warning for fs/ubifs/commit.c
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:57:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247738232.11353.90.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A5E1D1A.3090705@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 20:16 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 07:49 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >> Following fix is inspired by David Howells fix few days back:
> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/9/109,
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak<subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
> >> ---
> >
> > Removed junk comma at the end of "signed-off-by" and pushed to
> > the ubifs-2.6.git tree:
> >
> > http://git.infradead.org/ubifs-2.6.git?a=commit;h=5c1507e6097c4abc13bbad69de137366c9043f22
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> The changelog of the patch is bad. "Fix compilation warning" is not
> correct. It should be "suppress compilation warning" or "annotate
> unitialized variable" or whatever --- i.e. it should say what it does.
For me this sounds the same. But probably your version is better
English. I'll change this.
> Furthermore, since the 3 lines context around the change in the diff do
> not reveal why the chosen "fix" is correct and desirable, the changelog
> should also leave a note why it's done this way.
The changelog says which kind of warning is fixed, I though it is
obvious what is the warning. At lease for me it would.
But if Subrata sends me the warning he sees, I'll change that.
Thankfully I did not push the patch to ubifs-2.6.git/linux-next
which I never re-base, but pushed it to master which I do rebase
and it is documented here:
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html#L_source
So I may just amend the commit's message.
> The patch form David Howells which is quoted here has an equally bad
> subject, but at least its changelog goes on to explain what the patch
> really does and why it does it in the proposed way.
Well, I just thought this type of warnings and way of fixing is very
standard because I saw many similar fixes all over the place.
Anyway, amended the patch like this so far:
http://git.infradead.org/ubifs-2.6.git?a=commit;h=5c1507e6097c4abc13bbad69de137366c9043f22
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>,
Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/06] Fix compilation warning for fs/ubifs/commit.c
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:57:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247738232.11353.90.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A5E1D1A.3090705@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 20:16 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 07:49 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >> Following fix is inspired by David Howells fix few days back:
> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/9/109,
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak<subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
> >> ---
> >
> > Removed junk comma at the end of "signed-off-by" and pushed to
> > the ubifs-2.6.git tree:
> >
> > http://git.infradead.org/ubifs-2.6.git?a=commit;h=5c1507e6097c4abc13bbad69de137366c9043f22
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> The changelog of the patch is bad. "Fix compilation warning" is not
> correct. It should be "suppress compilation warning" or "annotate
> unitialized variable" or whatever --- i.e. it should say what it does.
For me this sounds the same. But probably your version is better
English. I'll change this.
> Furthermore, since the 3 lines context around the change in the diff do
> not reveal why the chosen "fix" is correct and desirable, the changelog
> should also leave a note why it's done this way.
The changelog says which kind of warning is fixed, I though it is
obvious what is the warning. At lease for me it would.
But if Subrata sends me the warning he sees, I'll change that.
Thankfully I did not push the patch to ubifs-2.6.git/linux-next
which I never re-base, but pushed it to master which I do rebase
and it is documented here:
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html#L_source
So I may just amend the commit's message.
> The patch form David Howells which is quoted here has an equally bad
> subject, but at least its changelog goes on to explain what the patch
> really does and why it does it in the proposed way.
Well, I just thought this type of warnings and way of fixing is very
standard because I saw many similar fixes all over the place.
Anyway, amended the patch like this so far:
http://git.infradead.org/ubifs-2.6.git?a=commit;h=5c1507e6097c4abc13bbad69de137366c9043f22
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-16 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-15 2:19 [PATCH 02/06] Fix compilation warning for fs/ubifs/commit.c Subrata Modak
2009-07-15 2:19 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-15 6:52 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-15 6:52 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-15 18:16 ` Stefan Richter
2009-07-15 18:16 ` Stefan Richter
2009-07-16 9:57 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2009-07-16 9:57 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-16 11:04 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-16 11:04 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-16 11:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-16 11:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-16 11:21 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-16 11:21 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-16 11:46 ` Stefan Richter
2009-07-16 11:46 ` Stefan Richter
2009-07-16 11:29 ` Stefan Richter
2009-07-16 11:29 ` Stefan Richter
2009-07-16 11:57 ` Stefan Richter
2009-07-16 11:57 ` Stefan Richter
2009-07-16 12:11 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-16 12:11 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-16 12:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-16 12:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-16 12:41 Subrata Modak
2009-07-16 12:41 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-16 12:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-16 12:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-16 13:10 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-16 13:10 ` Subrata Modak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247738232.11353.90.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dedekind@infradead.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.