All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/10] fs-DLM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 16:08:37 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281357904.5439026.1494274117018.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bd895d7-9448-928d-1e4c-42326ce20607@users.sourceforge.net>

----- Original Message -----
| From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
| Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 10:15:25 +0200
| 
| Some update suggestions were taken into account
| from static source code analysis.
| 
| Markus Elfring (10):
|   Replace six seq_puts() calls by seq_putc()
|   Add spaces for better code readability
|   Improve a size determination in table_seq_start()
|   Use kcalloc() in dlm_scan_waiters()
|   Improve a size determination in dlm_recover_waiters_pre()
|   Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in
|   dlm_recover_waiters_pre()
|   Use kmalloc_array() in make_member_array()
|   Use kcalloc() in two functions
|   Improve a size determination in two functions
|   Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in dlm_ls_start()
| 
|  fs/dlm/debug_fs.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
|  fs/dlm/lock.c     |  8 +++-----
|  fs/dlm/member.c   | 15 ++++++---------
|  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
| 
| --
| 2.12.2
| 
| 
Hi Markus,

I'm not a DLM maintainer, but I've reviewed your patch set and ACK them.
They seem to fit the spirit of:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/coding-style.html#allocating-memory

I've actually got a bunch of similar cleanups myself, but I don't think
there's any overlap.

Regards,

Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>,
	David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/10] fs-DLM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 20:08:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281357904.5439026.1494274117018.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bd895d7-9448-928d-1e4c-42326ce20607@users.sourceforge.net>

----- Original Message -----
| From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
| Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 10:15:25 +0200
| 
| Some update suggestions were taken into account
| from static source code analysis.
| 
| Markus Elfring (10):
|   Replace six seq_puts() calls by seq_putc()
|   Add spaces for better code readability
|   Improve a size determination in table_seq_start()
|   Use kcalloc() in dlm_scan_waiters()
|   Improve a size determination in dlm_recover_waiters_pre()
|   Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in
|   dlm_recover_waiters_pre()
|   Use kmalloc_array() in make_member_array()
|   Use kcalloc() in two functions
|   Improve a size determination in two functions
|   Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in dlm_ls_start()
| 
|  fs/dlm/debug_fs.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
|  fs/dlm/lock.c     |  8 +++-----
|  fs/dlm/member.c   | 15 ++++++---------
|  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
| 
| --
| 2.12.2
| 
| 
Hi Markus,

I'm not a DLM maintainer, but I've reviewed your patch set and ACK them.
They seem to fit the spirit of:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/coding-style.html#allocating-memory

I've actually got a bunch of similar cleanups myself, but I don't think
there's any overlap.

Regards,

Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>,
	David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/10] fs-DLM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 16:08:37 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281357904.5439026.1494274117018.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bd895d7-9448-928d-1e4c-42326ce20607@users.sourceforge.net>

----- Original Message -----
| From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
| Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 10:15:25 +0200
| 
| Some update suggestions were taken into account
| from static source code analysis.
| 
| Markus Elfring (10):
|   Replace six seq_puts() calls by seq_putc()
|   Add spaces for better code readability
|   Improve a size determination in table_seq_start()
|   Use kcalloc() in dlm_scan_waiters()
|   Improve a size determination in dlm_recover_waiters_pre()
|   Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in
|   dlm_recover_waiters_pre()
|   Use kmalloc_array() in make_member_array()
|   Use kcalloc() in two functions
|   Improve a size determination in two functions
|   Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in dlm_ls_start()
| 
|  fs/dlm/debug_fs.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
|  fs/dlm/lock.c     |  8 +++-----
|  fs/dlm/member.c   | 15 ++++++---------
|  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
| 
| --
| 2.12.2
| 
| 
Hi Markus,

I'm not a DLM maintainer, but I've reviewed your patch set and ACK them.
They seem to fit the spirit of:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/coding-style.html#allocating-memory

I've actually got a bunch of similar cleanups myself, but I don't think
there's any overlap.

Regards,

Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-08 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-06  8:34 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/10] fs-DLM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:34 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:34 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:36 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 01/10] dlm: Replace six seq_puts() calls by seq_putc() SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:36   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:36   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:38 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 02/10] dlm: Add spaces for better code readability SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:38   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:38   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:39 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 03/10] dlm: Improve a size determination in table_seq_start() SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:39   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:39   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:40 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 04/10] dlm: Use kcalloc() in dlm_scan_waiters() SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:40   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:40   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:41 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 05/10] dlm: Improve a size determination in dlm_recover_waiters_pre() SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:41   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:41   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:43 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 06/10] dlm: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation " SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:43   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:43   ` [PATCH 06/10] dlm: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in dlm_recover_waiters_pre SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:44 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 07/10] dlm: Use kmalloc_array() in make_member_array() SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:44   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:44   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:45 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 08/10] dlm: Use kcalloc() in two functions SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:45   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:45   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:47 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 09/10] dlm: Improve a size determination " SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:47   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:47   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:48 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 10/10] dlm: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in dlm_ls_start() SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:48   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-06  8:48   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-08 20:08 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2017-05-08 20:08   ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/10] fs-DLM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Bob Peterson
2017-05-08 20:08   ` Bob Peterson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1281357904.5439026.1494274117018.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.